THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN INTERPRETING AND PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Advertisements

Spread the love

Post Views: 1,080

This article is written by Aditi Kaushik of Unity PG and Law College, Lucknow of 4^th Semester, Intern under Legal Vidhiya.

ABSTRACT

The Supreme Court of India plays a crucial role in protecting and interpreting the Constitution of India. The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land, and the Supreme Court’s responsibility is to ensure that the Constitution is upheld and enforced. One of the primary roles of the Supreme Court is to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens. The Court’s interpretation of these rights has played a significant role in ensuring their protection.

The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has also had a significant impact on the democratic principles of India. The Court has played a crucial role in protecting free and fair elections, as seen in the case of People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, where the Court declared the right to vote a fundamental right. Similarly, the Court’s decision in the case of S.R. Bommai v. Union of India set guidelines for the imposition of President’s rule in a state, protecting the democratic processes in the state from being undermined by the central government. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution is based on several principles, including the text of the Constitution, the intent of the framers of the Constitution, the context in which the Constitution written, and judicial precedent. The Court’s interpretation provides guidance to the government on the implementation of the Constitution and ensures that the Constitution’s principles are upheld.

The Supreme Court of India’s role in protecting and interpreting the Constitution is critical to ensuring that the Constitution remains relevant in changing times. The Court’s interpretation provides guidance to the government on its implementation and ensures that the Constitution’s principles are upheld. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has a significant impact on governance in India, particularly in the areas of fundamental rights, democracy, and federalism.

INTRODUCTION

The Constitution of India is a supreme law of the land, and the role of the Supreme Court of India is protecting and interpreting the Constitution is crucial to ensuring the principles of justice, democracy, and equality enshrined in the Constitution are upheld. The Supreme Court of India is the final court of appeal and has the power of judicial review, which allows it to examine the constitutionality of laws and executive actions.

One of the primary roles of the Supreme Court is to protect the fundamental rights of Indian citizens. The Constitution of India guarantees several fundamental rights, including the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, and the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court has played a vital role in interpreting and protecting these fundamental rights, ensuring that they are not violated by the government or any other entity. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has also been essential in protecting the democratic principles of India.

The federal structure of India is another critical principle enshrined in the Constitution of India. The Constitution provides for a division of powers between the central government and the state governments, ensuring that each level of government has the autonomy to govern as per their respective mandates. The Supreme Court has played a vital role in protecting the autonomy of the state governments from encroachment by the central government and ensuring that the federal structure of the Constitution is not undermined.

INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION

The Constitution of India is a living document, and its interpretation is essential to ensure its continued relevance in changing times. The Supreme Court of India has the power to interpret the Constitution and provide guidance to the government on its implementation. The Constitution of India is the cornerstone of the country’s legal framework. It lays down the fundamental principles and values on which the country’s governance is based.

The Constitution provides the framework for the functioning of the government, the judiciary, and other institutions in the country. The interpretation of the Constitution is, therefore, a critical aspect of ensuring that the principles enshrined in it are upheld. The interpretation of the Constitution of India is primary responsibility of the judiciary, with the Supreme Court being the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which means that it can declare any law or action of the government unconstitutional if it violates the provisions of the Constitution.

The role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution of India is crucial. The Court’s interpretation of the Constitution provides guidance to the government on its implementation and ensures that the Constitution remains relevant in changing times. The Court’s interpretation of the Constitution also resolves disputes between different branches of government and between the government and citizens. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution is based on several principles, including the text of the Constitution, the intent of the framers of the Constitution, the context in which the Constitution was written, and judicial precedent. The following sections discuss these principles in detail.

The Text of the Constitution:

The text of the Constitution of India is the primary source of its interpretation. The Constitution contains several provisions that are specific and unambiguous. These provisions are interpreted according to their plain and ordinary meaning. For example, Article 21 of the Constitution states that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law.’’ This provision is interpreted to mean that no person can be deprived of their life or personal liberty except in accordance with the law.

However, some provisions of the Constitution are not clear and require interpretation. In such cases, the Supreme Court uses other principles of interpretation, as discussed below:

The Intent of the Framers of the Constitution:

The Intent of the Framers of the Constitution is another important principle of interpretation. The framers of the Constitution had a particular vision and purpose in mind when drafting the Constitution. The Supreme Court looks at the debates in the Constituent Assembly and other historical documents to understand the intent of the framers.

For example, in the case of Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court examined the debates in the Constituent Assembly to understand the framer’s intent in providing for a basic structure of the Constitution. The Court held that the basic structure of the Constitution could not be amended by the Parliament.

The Context in which the Constitution was Written:

The context in which the Constitution was written is also an important principle of interpretation. The Constitution was drafted in the aftermath of India’s independence from British rule. The Constitution was intended to create a democratic and secular republic that protected the rights of all citizens.

The Supreme Court looks at the social, economic, and political context in which the Constitution was written to understand its meaning. For example, in the case of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, the Supreme Court examined the social and economic context in which the Constitution was written to interpret the provisions relating to reservations for socially and economically backward classes.

Judicial Precedent:

Judicial Precedent is another important principle of interpretation. Judicial precedent refers to the principle that the decisions of the Supreme Court and other courts should be followed in similar cases in the future. Judicial Precedent ensures consistency and predictability in the law.

The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution is influenced by its previous decisions. The Court uses the principle of stare decisis, which means that it follows its previous decisions unless there is a compelling reason to depart from them.

For example, in the case of ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla, the Supreme Court held that the right to life and personal liberty could be suspended during a state of emergency. However, in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court overruled this decision and held that the right to life and personal liberty could not be suspended even during a state of emergency.

The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has a significant impact on the governance of the country. The Court’s interpretation of the Constitution helps to define the scope of government power and the rights of citizens. The following are some of the ways in which the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has influenced governance in India:

Protection of Fundamental Rights:
The Constitution of India guarantees several fundamental rights to its citizens, such as the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, and the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of these rights has played a critical role in protecting them.
For example, in the case of Golaknath v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court held that the parliament could not amend fundamental rights. This decision protected fundamental rights from being abrogated by the Parliament. Similarly, in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. This decision provided protection to women’s rights in the workplace.
Protection of Democracy:
The Constitution of India is based on the principles of democracy and free and fair elections. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has played a crucial role in protecting these principles.
For example, in the case of S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, the Supreme Court laid down guidelines for the imposition of President’s rule in a state. These guidelines prevented the central government from using President’s rule to undermine democratic processes in the states. Similarly, in the case of People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the right to vote was a fundamental right. This decision reinforced the importance of free and fair elections in a democracy.
Protection of Federalism :
The Constitution of India divides power between the central government and the state government. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has played a crucial role in protecting this federal structure.
For example, in the case of Kesavananda Bharti v. State o Kerala, the Supreme Court held that the basic structure of the Constitution could not be amended by the Parliament this decision protected the federal structure of the Constitution from being undermined by the central government. Similarly, in the case of West Bengal v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the central government could not encroach upon the powers of the state government. This decision protected the autonomy of the state governments.

PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION

Another critical function of the Supreme Court is to protect the Constitution from any infringement by the government or any other entity. The Constitution of India provides for the separation of powers, and the judiciary is vested with the power of judicial review to ensure that the government and other entities do not overstep their bounds.

The Supreme Court has the power to strike down any law or action of the government that is inconsistent with the Constitution. The Supreme Court has been instrumental in protecting the Constitution and upholding the rule of law in India.

The Supreme Court has struck down several laws and executive actions that were found to be unconstitutional. For example, in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court struck down a provision of the Passport Act, which gave the government the power to impound a citizen’s passport without providing a reason. The Court held that the provision violated the right to personal liberty guaranteed by the Constitution.

Similarly, in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, the Supreme Court struck down a provision of the Aadhaar Act that made it mandatory for citizens to link their biometric data with their bank accounts and mobile numbers. The Court held that the provision violated the right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has also been proactive in protecting the fundamental rights of citizens. The Court has taken Suo Moto cognizance of several cases involving human rights violations and has ordered compensation and rehabilitation for the victims.

Role of the Supreme Court in Protecting the Constitution of India:

Power of Judicial Review:
One of the most important functions of the Supreme Court of India is the power of judicial review. The power enables the Supreme Court to examine the constitutionality of laws and actions taken by the government. If the Supreme Court finds that a law or action taken by the government is unconstitutional, it has the power to strike down the law or action.
The power of judicial review is essential because it provides a system of checks and balances in the government’s functioning. It ensures that the government does not exceed its powers and the citizens’ rights are protected. The power of judicial review is an integral part of India’s constitutional framework and has been instrumental in protecting the Constitution.
Protection of Fundamental Rights:
The Constitution of India guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens of the country. These fundamental rights include the right to equality, the right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to life and personal liberty, and the right to education. The Supreme Court of India has been proactive in protecting these fundamental rights.
In several cases, the Supreme Court has taken Suo Moto cognizance of human rights violations and has ordered compensation and rehabilitation for the victims. The Supreme Court has also been proactive in protecting the rights of marginalized communities. In the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, the Supreme Court recognized the rights of transgender persons and directed the government to take steps to protect their rights.
Protection of Federal Structure:
India is a federal country, and the Constitution provides for a system of federalism. The Constitution divides the powers between the central government and the state governments. The Supreme Court has played a vital role in protecting the federal structure of India.
The Supreme Court has also played a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and clarifying the powers of the central government and state governments. In the case of the State of Karnataka v. Union of India, the Supreme Court clarified the powers of the central government and the state governments in the field of environmental protection.
Judicial Activism:
The Supreme Court of India has been criticized for being too activist and for overstepping its bounds. However, judicial activism can be a positive force for protecting the Constitution of India. Judicial activism refers to the Supreme Court’s proactive role in protecting the Constitution of India and ensuring that the government functions within the limits set by the Constitution.
Judicial activism is essential because it ensures that the Constitution remains relevant in changing times. It also ensures that the government does not exceed its powers and that the citizens’ rights are protected. The Supreme Court’s proactive role in protecting the Constitution of India has been instrumental in strengthening India’s democracy and upholding the rule of law.

The Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in protecting the rights of individuals and ensuring justice in cases where the government or other authorities have violated them. In some instances, the Supreme Court has taken suo moto cognizance of matters and initiated proceedings on its own accord. In other instances, it has acted upon petitions filed by individuals or groups seeking justice. Here are some notable cases where the Supreme Court has played a vital role in protecting rights:

Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997): In this case, the Supreme Court took suo moto cognizance of the issue of sexual harassment at the workplace and formulated guidelines to prevent it. The court directed all organizations to set up an internal complaints committee to receive complaints of sexual harassment and take appropriate action.
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984): The Supreme Court acted upon a writ petition filed by the Bandhua Mukti Morcha, a non-governmental organization working for the liberation of bonded laborers across the country. The court also directed the government to rehabilitate and provide compensation to these laborers.
State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar (1991): In this case, the Supreme Court took suo moto cognizance of the issue of custodial deaths and issued guidelines to prevent them. The court directed the government to take appropriate action against police officers who were found to be responsible for custodial deaths.
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): In this case, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which criminalized online speech deemed offensive or harmful. The court held that the provision was unconstitutional as it violated the right to freedom of speech and expression.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court upheld the right to privacy as a fundamental right under the Constitution of India. The court held that privacy was an integral part of personal liberty and dignity and that it was necessary for the protection of other fundamental rights.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the Supreme Court of India plays a critical role in protecting and interpreting the Constitution of India. The Court’s power of judicial review allows it to examine the constitutionality of laws and executive actions, ensuring that they are consistent with the principles enshrined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has been instrumental in protecting the fundamental rights of Indian citizens, the democratic principles of India, and the federal structure of the country. The Court’s interpretation provides guidance to the government on the implementation of the Constitution, ensuring that the Constitution’s principles are upheld.

The Supreme Court’s role in protecting the fundamental rights of Indian citizens cannot be overstated. The Court’s interpretation of the Constitution has ensured that the government and other entities do not violate the fundamental rights of Indian citizens. The Court has played a crucial role in protecting the right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, and the right to life and personal liberty, among other fundamental rights.

The role of the Supreme Court in protecting and interpreting the Constitution of India is crucial to maintaining the principles of justice, democracy, and equality enshrined in the Constitution. The Court’s interpretation has had a significant impact on governance in India, particularly in the areas of fundamental rights, democracy, and federalism. The Supreme Court’s role in interpreting the Constitution provides guidance to the government on its implementation and ensures that the Constitution’s principles are upheld, making it a critical institution in the governance of India.

REFERENCES