Citation CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1643 OF 2013 Date of Judgement 8 October, 2013 Court Supreme Court Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff Kunwar Pal Respondents/Defendant The State of Uttarakhand Bench B.S. Chauhan, S.A. Bobde FACTS- ISSUE- CONTENTIONS- JUDGEMENT- REFERENCES- This case analysis is written by Anshula Grover, intern at Legal Vidhiya and a student Read more…
Citation (2013) 13 SCC 1 Date of Judgement 21 March 2013 Court Supreme Court Case Type Criminal Appeal No. 1178 of 2017 Appellant Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Respondent State of Maharashtra Bench SS Shinde, Manish Pitale Facts of the Case The bomb blasts that happened on 12 March 1993 at Read more…
CITATION (2014) 4 SCC 375 DATE OF JUDGMENT October 8, 2013 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Sunil Dutt Sharma RESPONDENT State (Government Of NCT of Delhi) BENCH S.J. Mukhopadhaya And Ranjan Gogoi, JJ. INTRODUCTION Introduction: In the present case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has deliberated upon the appropriate quantum Read more…
CITATION 1 SCC 188 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 18 October, 2013 COURT Supreme Court of India PETITIONER Badshah RESPONDENT Sou.Urmila Badshah Godse & Anr. BENCH Ranjana Prakash Desai, A.K. Sikri INTRODUCTION In the highly intriguing case of Badshah v. Urmila Badshah[1] from 2013, the petitioner, Mr. Badshah, withheld support to his Read more…
Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal No 1643 of 2013 Date of Judgment 08 October, 2013 Court Supreme Court of India Appellant Kunwar pal Respondent State of Uttarakhand Bench B.S. Chauhan, S.A. Bobde Citation S.L.P (Crl.) No. 2792 Facts of the Case: On May 22, 1998, during a marriage ceremony in Uttarakhand, a Read more…
CITATION (2013) 10 SCC 324 DATE OF JUDGMENT 12th August, 2013 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Deepali Gundu Surwase. RESPONDENT Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidtalaya (D. Ed.) And Others BENCH G.S. Singhvi and V. Gopala Gowda, JJ. INTRODUCTION This Appeal is filed by the Appellant being aggrieved by the Judgment Read more…
Cases referred Introduction Facts of the case Issue of the case Arguments: The Petitioner contended that The Respondent maintained the following objections that Judgment: Conclusion Drafted by: Jhalak Varshney, Lloyd Law college, Greater Noida Admin legalvidhiya.com
Citation (2013)7 SCC 653 Date of Judgement 10/7/2013 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Writ Petition (Civil) Petitioner Lily Thomas and General Secretary S.N.Shukla Respondent Union of India Bench Justice A.K.Patnaik and Justice S.J Mukhopadhaya INTRODUCTION – Indian attorney Lily Thomas petitioned the Supreme Court and her lower courts to Read more…