CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 5047 of 2000 PETITIONER: Virendra Kumar Srivastava RESPONDENT: U.P. Rajya Karmachari Kal. Nigam and another DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/11/2004 BENCH: Y. K. Sabharwal & D. M. Dharmadhikari INTRODUCTION The case of “Virendra Kumar Srivastava vs U.P. Rajya Karmachari Kal Nigam And Others,” decided by the Allahabad Read more…
INTRODUCTION In the case of Boota Singh v State of Haryana, it involves the trials and arrest of various individuals as they are accused for selling poppy straw in the vehicles. The police conducted a raid and apprehended three individuals and recovered a large amount of poppy straw.These individuals were Read more…
CITATION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 510 OF 2021[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) NO. 1796/2021] DATE OF JUDGMENT MAY 12, 2021 COURT THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. APPELLANT GAUTAM NAVLAKHA RESPONDENT NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY BENCH JUSTICE UDAY LALIT ANDJUSTICE K.M JOSEPH INTRODUCTION The appellant, Gautam Navlakha is a human rights activist Read more…
![Sudesh Kedia Vs. Union of India [April 09, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Screenshot-2024-09-29-191342-360x240.png)
CITATION 2021 INSC 245 DATE OF JUDGMENT 09th April 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Sudesh Kedia RESPONDENT Union of India BENCH Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Nageshwar Rao of the bench comprising: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nageshwar Rao and Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat INTRODUCTION In this case, appellant Read more…
CITATION 2021 SC 251, (2021) 6 SCC 213 DATE OF JUDGEMENT May 7, 2021 COURT Supreme Court APPELLANT Jayamma & Another RESPONDENT State of Karnataka BENCH Aniruddha Bose, Suryakant, JJ. INTRODUCTION The Case of Jayamma & Anr vs State of Karnataka revolves around the evidentiary value of the dying declaration Read more…
CITATION Civil appeal no.1653 of 2021 DATE OF JUDGMENT 30th April,2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Sukhbir RESPONDENT Ajit Singh BENCH Hon’ble Dr.Chandrachud,M.R.Shah INTRODUCTION The case of Sukhbir Vs Ajit Singh revolves around the principle of compensation in instances where contractual obligations are unfulfilled due to circumstances beyond the Read more…
CITATION AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 1876, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 190, 2021 (2) AJR 238 DATE OF JUDGMENT 09th April 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Central Coalfields Limited Through its Chairman and Managing Director & Ors. RESPONDENT Smt. Parden Oraon BENCH Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Justice L. Nageswara Rao Read more…
CITATION 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 358 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 3rd May, 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) RESPONDENT E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. BENCH L. Nageswara Rao Vineet Saran, JJ. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India in the case of Bangalore Read more…
![Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs. G. Pattanaik [June 03, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Screenshot-2024-09-27-191835-360x240.png)
CITATION [2021] 5 S.C.R. 305 DATE OF JUDGMENT 3rd June 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Abhishek Kumar Singh RESPONDENT G. Pattanaik BENCH Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar Introduction In Abhishek Kumar Singh v. G. Pattanaik & Ors., the Supreme Court had to consider challenges to the administrative orders Read more…
![Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta [March 08, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Screenshot-2024-09-27-191450-360x240.png)
CITATION AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 1409 DATE OF JUDGMENT 8 March, 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. RESPONDENT Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta BENCH V. Ramasubramanian, A. S. Bopanna, S. A. Bobde Introduction The case of Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. v. CCE, Calcutta is one Read more…