The petitioner who asked the Supreme Court to direct the Bombay High Court to resolve a case within a specific time frame has been charged a penalty of ₹1.5 lakh by the Supreme Court.

The petitioner who asked the Supreme Court to direct the Bombay High Court to resolve a case within a specific time frame has been charged a penalty of ₹1.5 lakh by the Supreme Court.

Keywords: article 32, Bombay high court, penalty A builder was fined ₹1, 50,000 by the Supreme Court for submitting a petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, asking for a writ of mandamus to the Bombay High Court to resolve a 2019 appeal within a designated timeframe. The builder’s Read more

Narinderjit Singh Sahni and anr. vs. Union of India and ors

  Narinderjit Singh Sahni and anr. vs. Union of India and ors AIR 2001 SC 3810                                                          Dealt with the constitutional validity of provisions in the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. ABSTRACT Narinderjit Singh Sahni and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. is a case decided by the Read more

The Supreme Court Asked the Assam State Government to provide reasons for its pleas against the decisions given by Guwahati High Court.

The Supreme Court Asked the Assam State Government to provide reasons for its pleas against the decisions given by Guwahati High Court.

On Tuesday the Hon’ble Supreme Court expressed its disagreements to the State Government of Assam decision to challenge the decision of Guwahati high court which ensured efficient follow of rules and regulations of Constitutional ASSAM REPALING ACT. The Topic was of giving a legal letter on the case which was Read more