“SUPREME COURT ALLOWS APPEAL: VOTER’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CANDIDATE’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN MATTERS NOT RELEVANT TO HIS CANDIDATURE FOR PUBLIC OFFICE”

“SUPREME COURT ALLOWS APPEAL: VOTER’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CANDIDATE’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN MATTERS NOT RELEVANT TO HIS CANDIDATURE FOR PUBLIC OFFICE”

The Supreme Court in its judgment dated 09.04.2024 setting aside the Judgment and Order passed by the Itanagar Bench of the High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh allowed the Civil Appeal No. 4615 of 2023 filed by Karikho Kri.  In 2019, Karikho Kri, an independent candidate, Dr. Read more…

There cannot be a break in the sequence of events in a case where the conviction is based solely on circumstantial evidence, reiterates the Apex Court.

There cannot be a break in the sequence of events in a case where the conviction is based solely on circumstantial evidence, reiterates the Apex Court.

Darshan Singh v State of Punjab is a 2024 Supreme Court case about a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence. The defendant was accused of throwing his wife into a canal, where she drowned. It was alleged by the accused that his wife committed suicide. The Supreme Court declared that Read more…

TO RELEASE A SEIZED VEHICLE, FOLLOW LEGAL PROCEDURES UNDER SEC 451 CRPC INSTEAD OF INVOKING ARTICLES 226 OR 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION DIRECTLY.

TO RELEASE A SEIZED VEHICLE, FOLLOW LEGAL PROCEDURES UNDER SEC 451 CRPC INSTEAD OF INVOKING ARTICLES 226 OR 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION DIRECTLY.

Justice Bela M.Trivedi and Justice Pankaj Mithal ruled that that the appellant can not invoke Writ Jurisdiction or Supervisory Jurisdiction under Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 unless a petition is filed before the concerned court to release the seized vehicle by the authority under Read more…

Extending the Jurisdictional Win: Bharti Airtel's Win in Consumer Case

Extending the Jurisdictional Win: Bharti Airtel’s Win in Consumer Case

India’s largest telecom company, Bharti Airtel Ltd., triumphed over consumer accusations in a well-publicized legal battle that enthralled legal circles and industry participants. Leading the legal action was A.S. Raghavendra, a longtime customer of Bharti Airtel, whose complaint brought attention to controversial concerns related to billing methods and service quality Read more…