In the case of Dinesh B.S V. State of Karnataka, the division bench comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice Pankaj Mithal relied on Laxmi Raj Shetty & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1988) 3 SCC 319 and reiterated that a newspaper report is only hearsay evidence and it can only be treated as secondary evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Name:Rajan chaudhary, College:Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri law college University of Calcutta , Semester:4th semester,Legal intern at legal vidhiya
Spread the loveThe High Court Concerns over the matter of illegal construction of the blockage and as a result the artificial floods were created, destruction happened. The Court analyses the matter and taken consideration upon Read more
Spread the loveThe High Court stated that the children should bear their parents at their old age by providing the amount of maintenance in order to sustain their livelihood and also declared that the moral Read more
Spread the loveThe Division Bench pronounced this verdict while answering a reference after 2 single-judge benches gave contradicting judgements on the protection matter. The Court considered the question of whether live-in couples should be granted Read more
0 Comments