![](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/image-213-1024x768.png)
In a recent development, the State government faced strong criticism from the Karnataka High Court on Monday over its inability to effectively cater to the basic needs of girls in government schools across the State. During the hearing of a public interest litigation (PIL) petition, Chief Justice PB Varale, and Justice MGS Kamal, serving on a division bench, expressed their disappointment and reprimanded the government, describing the situation as highly regrettable. The court emphasized that the provision of drinking water and washroom facilities for girls in government schools should be considered an essential prerequisite, underscoring the urgent need for improvement in this regard.
Upon reviewing a submitted report, the Court made an important observation regarding the lack of essential facilities in schools in Kalaburgi. Shockingly, out of the 2,000 schools assessed, 22 were found to be devoid of drinking water facilities, while 126 lacked proper washrooms.
Expressing concern, the Division Bench raised questions about the performance of school inspectors employed by the government. The Court inquired about their responsibilities, questioning whether these inspectors were fulfilling their duties diligently. The Bench further demanded clarification on whether the inspectors were submitting periodic reports as required. Even if such reports were submitted, the Court questioned their effectiveness, highlighting the need for accountability at the superior officer level.
It was observed by the Court that these duties existed merely on paper and the necessary actions were not being taken by the appointed authorities of the State. A demand was made by the Court, questioning whether the inspectors were merely confined to their offices without making periodic visits to schools, while also stressing the importance of superior officers issuing clear directives.
The issue addressed in the PIL pertained to the failure in implementing the provisions outlined in the Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2009 and the Karnataka Right to Free and Compulsory Education Rules. As a result, a significant number of children found themselves deprived of educational opportunities.
During the hearing, a crucial observation was made, highlighting the fact that despite the PIL being acknowledged in 2013, the situation has deteriorated over the course of the past ten years.
As a result, the Court decided to adjourn the hearing and set a new date for June 15. Furthermore, the State government was instructed to provide its response concerning the measures taken in response to the recommendations put forth by the amicus curiae.
Written by – Sohini Chakraborty intern under Legal Vidhiya
![Legal Vidhiya](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/image-191.png)
0 Comments