GROUNDS FOR EVICTION OF TENANTS

Advertisements

Spread the love

Post Views: 1,131

This article is written by Aadrika Malhotra of 4th Semester of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya

Abstract

Renting out a house or flat can be a complex process. It involves finding a suitable tenant and establishing a rental agreement with someone trustworthy enough to entrust with your property. There’s a significant element of risk involved in entrusting your property to a stranger. On numerous occasions, landlords find themselves in situations where they require their property for personal use or need to remove a tenant for various reasons. Some of these reasons might be attributed to the tenant’s actions. However, there are instances when tenants may be uncooperative and decline to vacate the property despite repeated requests from the owner. In such cases, it becomes necessary for landlords to pursue legal means to regain possession of their property. This article aims to provide guidance to property owners on the legal steps involved in evicting tenants and reclaiming their property.

Introduction

Landlords possess a range of legal options as stipulated in the Uniform Residential Landlord Tenant Act (URLTA) of 1872. These options encompass actions such as forfeiture, seeking monetary compensation, applying certain self-help remedies, or initiating eviction procedures. Within the framework of the URLTA, a landlord retains the authority to request that their tenant vacate the premises and can initiate the formal process of eviction if necessary.

Eviction represents the formal procedure by which landlords can lawfully remove tenants from their property. This process commences with the landlord issuing a notice to the tenant, either to address grievances or to vacate the premises. If these matters are not resolved, legal proceedings for eviction can be initiated, during which both parties present their respective arguments. At the conclusion of these proceedings, if the court rules in favor of the landlord, the tenant is obligated to vacate the property, restoring possession to the owner.

The legal precedent set by the case of Achintya Kumar Saha v. Nanee Printers holds significant weight. It underscores the importance of adhering to rent control laws and the concept of statutory tenancy in the context of urban buildings. This precedent establishes that it has become a common practice to initiate the process of determining tenancy through a notice to quit before pursuing eviction based on grounds permitted by such laws.

In situations where a tenant is uncooperative and unwilling to engage in peaceful resolution, landlords retain the option to serve an eviction notice. This notice holds relevance not only for tenancies with temporary durations but also for those with fixed terms. The issuance of an eviction notice provides a legal avenue to challenge and subsequently ascertain the nature of the tenancy, irrespective of its duration. This legal mechanism offers landlords a way to address disputes and regain possession of their property when faced with uncooperative tenants.

Eviction Laws in India

A rental tenancy represents a form of lease arrangement where a property is temporarily transferred from the owner, referred to as the lessor, to the tenant, known as the lessee. This is in accordance with Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Meanwhile, the Rent Control Act of 1948 was established by the Indian Government to regulate property rentals and oversee tenant evictions within the country. The Rent Control Act comprehensively covers the legal provisions pertaining to both tenants and landlords. An essential prerequisite in this context is the presence of a well-defined rental agreement with the tenant. This agreement outlines crucial details including the rent amount, agreement duration, security deposit terms, and the purpose of occupancy.

Under the protective umbrella of the Rent Control Act, tenants are safeguarded from arbitrary eviction from their rented homes, except under specific circumstances and conditions. Meanwhile, landlords maintain the prerogative to evict tenants if certain stipulated actions are committed by the tenant or if the landlord requires the property for personal use.

A Suit for Eviction

The most pivotal document is the rental agreement, encompassing the contractual terms and conditions, thereby establishing the legal relationship between a landlord and a tenant. This agreement ought to incorporate an eviction provision, which can be invoked in case of disputes. The process of tenant eviction is viable exclusively upon the lease’s conclusion or if the landlord terminates the lease through an official notice, as specified in Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Should the tenant persist in non-compliance, the landlord must resort to legal action, seeking a court order to facilitate the eviction process.

The Whole Eviction Process

If the tenant fails to comply with the eviction notice, the eviction process can then be initiated against them. This principle was established in the case of Munisami Naidu v. C. Ranganathan, where it was determined that the Board had the right to initiate legal proceedings against the tenant once the notice period had lapsed. A similar situation arose in the case of Vasant Kumar Radhakishan Vora v. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, in which the plaintiff took legal action against the defendant for disregarding the eviction notice.

Subsequent to the filing of the lawsuit in court, the legal proceedings commence, which may extend longer than anticipated before reaching a resolution. Following the proceedings, the court makes a decision based on the presented facts and arguments from both parties regarding the eviction. Should the plaintiff (the property owner) emerge victorious, the court mandates the tenant to vacate the premises within a reasonable specified timeframe. If the tenant remains non-compliant, resorting to the assistance of law enforcement can be considered to ensure the tenant’s removal.

Grounds for Eviction Tenants

Grounds for the eviction of a tenant from your property may include:

Personal Requirement or Family Member’s Need: If you require the property for personal use or for a family member’s necessity.
Unauthorized Subleasing: If the tenant subleases the property to another individual without obtaining your permission or acknowledgment.
Property Value Decrease: If the actions of the tenant have resulted in a noticeable decrease in the value or condition of the property.
Construction Necessity: If you intend to construct a new structure that requires the demolition of the existing property.
Structural Development: If your plan involves constructing a new building that necessitates the removal of the current one.
Non-Payment of Rent: If the tenant fails to pay the rent as specified in the rental agreement for more than 15 days after the due date.
Nuisance or Disturbance: If the tenant’s behavior or activities become a nuisance to neighbours, leading to complaints against the tenant.
Illegal Use: If the tenant uses the rented property for unlawful purposes or activities not outlined in the rental agreement.
False Ownership Claim: If the tenant intentionally misrepresents themselves as the owner of the rented property.

Process of Eviction of Tenants

To properly proceed with tenant eviction, while adhering to lawful practices and avoiding improper methods, the following steps should be followed:

Issue an Eviction Notice

Initiate the eviction process by sending a formal notice to the tenant requesting them to vacate the premises. This notice should be filed with a competent court, outlining the reasons for eviction and specifying the deadline by which the tenant must leave. It’s crucial to provide the tenant with a reasonable amount of time to vacate. Often, upon receiving the court-sanctioned notice, tenants choose to vacate voluntarily.

Initiate Eviction Lawsuit

Should the tenant decide not to comply with the eviction notice and contest the decision, landlords can seek legal recourse by engaging a rental property attorney. The attorney can then file an eviction lawsuit on behalf of the landlord. This legal action is presented in the civil court with jurisdiction over the rented property.

Court Hearing and Final Notice

During the court proceedings, both the landlord and the tenant present their arguments and evidence. Subsequently, the court deliberates and issues a conclusive legal eviction notice based on the facts presented. This final eviction order is binding, and the tenant must adhere to it. Ignoring or disregarding this notice is not an option for the tenant.

Adhering to these steps in accordance with the law ensures a proper and legally valid eviction process while respecting the rights of both parties involved.

Right of the Tenants

Instances have arisen where eviction notices have been unjustly served to tenants without valid grounds. In some cases, landlords have resorted to falsely accusing tenants of rent non-payment, employing such tactics to forcibly remove them from the rented property. In situations of such fraudulent claims, tenants maintain the right to defend themselves and counter the eviction attempts. They can assert their rights and seek assistance from the Rent Controllers in their respective region, operating under the framework of the Rent Control Act, 1948.

During the legal proceedings, tenants have the ability to substantiate their position by presenting evidence such as payment receipts or records of deposited funds. While proving cash transactions might pose a challenge, it’s advisable to specify the mode of rent payment in advance within the rental agreement to facilitate clear documentation. Additionally, tenants possess the option to file a petition against a landlord resorting to illicit methods for eviction, even if the tenant is found to be in the wrong. This underscores the principle that landlords are prohibited from adopting unilateral actions to expel tenants, irrespective of the circumstances.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Eviction

For Landlords

Advantages

Evictions provide landlords with the means to address issues posed by unruly, non-compliant, or rent-delinquent tenants, ensuring the upkeep of property standards and maintaining peaceful occupancy.
By evicting undesirable tenants, landlords can open up opportunities to lease their property to more responsible and reliable tenants, thereby safeguarding their property and investment.
Evictions serve as a protective measure for landlords to uphold their property’s condition and value by removing tenants who might be causing damage or neglecting maintenance.

Disadvantages

Eviction proceedings can be financially burdensome due to legal fees, court costs, and potential property damage during the process.
Eviction processes can be time-consuming, leading to loss of rental income and requiring significant time and effort from landlords.
Evictions can strain landlord-tenant relationships, leading to negative interactions, potential legal disputes, and reputational damage.

For Tenants

Advantages

An eviction might provide tenants with an opportunity to seek better living conditions elsewhere if their current residence is unsatisfactory.
Tenants are protected by certain legal rights during the eviction process, ensuring that the procedure is carried out fairly and in accordance with the law.
An eviction could prompt tenants to reassess their financial situation and take measures to improve their credit and financial stability.

Disadvantages

The repercussions of an eviction can linger, potentially affecting a tenant’s rental history and their ability to secure housing in the future.
Having an eviction on record might limit a tenant’s choices when seeking new rental opportunities, as landlords often consider eviction history during the application process.
Evictions can be emotionally distressing for tenants, causing upheaval and instability in their lives.
In certain situations, landlords might be understanding of the circumstances leading to an eviction, such as the conversion of rental properties into condominiums. In these cases, an eviction resulting from such actions might not necessarily have a negative impact on a potential tenant’s application.

Conclusion

Numerous landlords have voiced concerns regarding tenants who consistently fail to pay rent on schedule, neglect property maintenance, and overstay their rental agreements beyond their designated term. To address these challenges, the Rent Control Act of 1948 was introduced, focusing on the critical matters of rent and rent control. Initially established as a Union law, subsequent to its implementation, various states began modifying and supplementing the legislation to align with their distinct requirements and conditions. While these state-specific statutes and amendments share commonalities with the federal legislation, they also exhibit some variations.

The fundamental objective of the Rent Control Act of 1948 is to regulate property rental practices, ensuring a balanced and equitable relationship between landlords and tenants. It strives to prevent exploitation on either side. While its primary focus is on safeguarding tenant rights, the statute also incorporates provisions to uphold the rights of landlords.

References