This Article is written by Simran Goel of Asian Law College, Noida, an intern under Legal Vidhiya.
ABSTRACT
This article looks at the complex challenge of ensuring dignity for sex workers, a group that is often marginalized and stigmatized worldwide. It argues that a human rights approach which moves beyond criminalization, is crucial for protecting their basic rights, including the right to live with dignity, health, and freedom from discrimination. The article examines the systemic issues that contribute to the denial of dignity, such as social stigma, violence, lack of legal protection, and obstacles to essential services. Concentrating on India, it examines the existing legal structure, including the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act (ITPA), and assesses significant Supreme Court rulings that have acknowledged sex work as a legitimate profession and defended the fundamental rights of sex workers. Finally, it suggests a detailed set of policy and social measures, pushing for decriminalization, better access to healthcare and social services, and community-led initiatives. These steps aim to create an environment where sex workers can live and work with dignity and respect.
KEYWORDS
Sex workers, dignity, human rights, decriminalization, stigma, violence, Immoral Traffic Prevention Act (ITPA), India, Supreme Court, fundamental rights, healthcare access, social welfare, prostitution, Budhadev Karmaskar, rehabilitation.
RECLAIMING DIGNITY: A HUMAN RIGHTS IMPERATIVE FOR SEX WORKERS
Globally, millions of people involved in sex work face a widespread denial of dignity. They often live in precarious situations where their basic human rights are violated. In India, for example, despite a large and often visible sex worker population, they remain marginalized. They endure societal scorn, police harassment, and exploitative conditions. For sex workers, “dignity” means more than just physical survival. It includes the right to respect, personal choice, safety from violence, freedom from discrimination, and equal access to the civic and social rights enjoyed by other citizens. It is about recognizing their humanity and providing them with the protections and acknowledgment that every person deserves.
Around the world, different legal models, from complete criminalization and prohibition to legalization, decriminalization, and the Nordic model, shape the lives of sex workers. These models can have significant effects on their dignity. This article argues that many of these approaches, especially those based on punishment, undermine the concept of dignity. Ensuring real dignity for sex workers requires a shift from criminalization and moral judgments to a framework based on human rights. This framework should decriminalize sex work, guarantee access to legal protection and social services, and work against deeply rooted societal stigma. This discussion will examine the shortcomings of current legal systems, highlight key aspects of a human rights-based approach, and explore ways to build a society that respects the dignity of all its members.
THE SYSTEMIC DENIAL OF DIGNITY: CHALLENGES FACED BY SEX WORKERS
Sex workers often face harsh moral judgment, which leads to their isolation from mainstream society. This bias affects their social acceptance, often breaking family ties and making it extremely hard to integrate into community life. The widespread disdain can also cause internalized stigma, where sex workers struggle with feelings of shame and worthlessness, diminishing their self-worth and making it tougher to seek support or stand up for their rights.
This marginalization renders sex workers particularly susceptible to violence and exploitation. They are at a higher risk of physical, sexual, and psychological abuse from various people, including clients, exploitative third parties often misidentified as “pimps,” and even law enforcement officials. The fear of legal consequences, combined with deep social shame, creates a significant barrier to pursuing justice, leading to a serious lack of effective ways to seek help. It is crucial to make a clear distinction between consensual adult sex work, which should be safeguarded by human rights legislation, and human trafficking or forced prostitution, which are severe offenses that necessitate strict prosecution of traffickers and assistance for victims.
Legal confusion and harassment worsen these vulnerabilities. Even in places where selling sex is not explicitly criminalized, related activities, like soliciting, running a brothel, or living off the earnings of sex work, are often illegal. Law enforcement frequently uses these laws to harass, extort, and make arbitrary arrests. Police raids are common, not to protect sex workers, but often to extort money or exert control, creating fear and distrust towards the very institutions meant to provide safety.
The systemic denial of dignity also shows up as barriers to essential services. Sex workers face major obstacles in accessing healthcare due to stigma from medical staff, lack of identification documents, and fear of discrimination, despite the high rates of STIs, HIV, and mental health issues within the community. Access to housing is similarly challenging, leading many into unsafe living situations. Their children often face social exclusion and significant difficulties in getting a quality education. Additionally, financial inclusion is hard to achieve; sex workers often find it difficult to open bank accounts, get credit, or obtain formal jobs because of their stigmatized identity and lack of recognized income.
Ultimately, sex workers are mainly excluded from standard labor laws. This exclusion denies them basic protections, benefits, and the ability to join in collective bargaining like workers in other sectors. Without official recognition of their work as legitimate labor, they cannot form unions, fight for safer working conditions, or demand fair pay without the constant fear of legal repercussions, leaving them in a vulnerable and unprotected situation.
THE INDIAN CONTEXT: LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND REALITIES
In India, the primary legislation governing sex work is the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITPA). Although its goal is to stop and reduce immoral traffic in people, mainly women and girls, for prostitution, its current enforcement often strays far from this aim. It usually focuses on sex workers themselves instead of the exploitative third parties or traffickers. Under the ITPA, adults selling sex consensually in private are not specifically breaking the law. However, the law does criminalize several related activities, such as soliciting in public, running brothels, living off the earnings of prostitution (even if those earnings come from a consensual adult sex worker), and organized prostitution. This creates a confusing and dangerous legal situation. It leaves sex workers without clear legal protection, making them vulnerable to harassment, exploitation, and abuse by law enforcement and others.
These legal uncertainties greatly affect India’s sex-worker communities. Living and working conditions in many red-light districts are often terrible. The conditions are cramped, sanitation facilities are lacking, and there is an ongoing threat of violence. The relationship between sex workers and law enforcement is particularly tense. Despite the ITPA’s intent, police misconduct and harassment are common. Sex workers often report random arrests, detentions, demands for bribes, and even physical and sexual abuse from police officers who take advantage of legal loopholes and the marginalized status of sex workers. This ongoing fear of legal consequences and abuse forces sex workers further underground, making them even more susceptible to exploitation and less likely to report crimes against them.
Amid these challenges, community-based organizations are vital. Groups like the Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee in Sonagachi, Kolkata, are outstanding examples. Founded and run by sex workers, Durbar has played a key role in advocating for their rights, providing health services (especially for HIV/AIDS prevention), promoting safe practices, and offering support against violence and discrimination. Their efforts show the strength of collective organizing in fighting for dignity and better conditions in a hostile legal and social setting.
Despite the widespread denial of rights, constitutional guarantees are supposed to cover all citizens of India, including sex workers. Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the right to live with dignity, which should apply to sex workers regardless of their job. Article 14 (Right to Equality before the law and equal protection of laws) ensures that no one can be denied equality. Additionally, Article 15 (Prohibition of discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth) should stop discrimination against sex workers due to their occupation or perceived moral standing. However, in reality, these basic constitutional rights are often systematically denied to sex workers, revealing a significant gap between legal provisions and actual experiences.
INDIAN LANDMARK JUDGMENTS: A SHIFTING LEGAL LANDSCAPE
The Indian judiciary has, through a series of progressive rulings, often filled the gaps left by slow-moving legislation, advocating for the human rights of marginalized communities. This judicial activism has been especially important for sex workers, whose dignity and rights have often been ignored by society and the law. These landmark decisions represent a vital, if gradual, change in the legal environment, pushing towards a more rights-focused approach.
One of the most important recent cases is BUDHADEV KARMASKAR V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL[1]. This case began with a 2011 Supreme Court order that created an expert committee to look into issues involving sex workers. The final judgment in May 2022 marked a significant turning point. The Supreme Court explicitly recognized sex work as a “profession,” asserting that sex workers are entitled to “dignity and equal protection under the law,” in reference to Article 21 of the Constitution, which safeguards the right to live with dignity. Importantly, the Court instructed the police not to disrupt or charge consenting adult sex workers, clarifying that voluntary sex work is not illegal, unlike operating brothels or soliciting in public. Further instructions called for no harassment during police raids, respecting the privacy of sex workers, and protecting their identities. A key point in the judgment was the directive that a child of a sex worker should not be taken away from her mother simply because she is in that profession. The Court also issued broader orders to protect sex workers from violence, ensure they have access to medical care, and help those who want to leave the profession. This judgment provides a strong legal foundation for fighting for sex workers’ rights and against discriminatory practices.
Another important case is SMT. AFJAL V. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH[2]. Although the impact of this ruling on the dignity of sex workers often gets lost in larger discussions about the ITPA’s enforcement, it represents one of many situations where courts have been forced to interpret the ITPA. These cases often emphasize the difference between trafficking and consensual sex work, warning against applying the law indiscriminately in ways that target individuals instead of traffickers. While these rulings may not always be as sweeping as Budhadev Karmaskar’s, they contribute to a growing body of legal interpretation aimed at humanizing views of sex work. Courts have also intervened in various situations to ensure access to specific services and protections, including upholding the rights of sex workers’ children, such as their right to education without discrimination.
Despite these important judicial rulings, real-life impacts remain difficult. Deeply rooted societal attitudes, enduring moral judgments, and a lack of awareness among law enforcement and the public often hinder the effective application of these judgments. The ongoing existence of the ITPA’s restrictive clauses, especially those that criminalize related activities, creates a persistent gray area that is exploited. This shows a significant gap between progressive legal rulings and the actual experiences of sex workers, highlighting the continuing need for legislative reform and ongoing advocacy to truly achieve dignity and human rights.
PATHWAYS TO ENSURING DIGNITY: A MULTI-PRONGED APPROACH
Ensuring true dignity for sex workers requires a broad approach that goes beyond punishment and promotes human rights. Key to this change are important legal reforms. The discussion often centers on decriminalization versus legalization. Decriminalization means removing all legal penalties for consensual adult sex work, including related activities like soliciting and running brothels, and treating it like any other job. Legalization, on the other hand, involves government regulation of sex work through specific licenses, zoning, and health checks. Sex-worker rights organizations largely support decriminalization as the best option. It diminishes stigma, enables sex workers to report violence without the fear of being arrested, and changes the emphasis from punishment to safety. The advantages are significant: better health outcomes because of less fear in seeking care, reduced exploitation by removing the illegal leverage of third parties, and the potential for improved working conditions through collective organizing.
Beyond legal reforms, increasing access to healthcare and social services is crucial. This means setting up dedicated, stigma-free health clinics for sex workers to receive private and respectful care. These services should be part of mainstream health programs, like India’s Ayushman Bharat, ensuring complete and affordable access to healthcare without discrimination. Access to social security benefits, pensions, and housing assistance is also important for providing a safety net and long-term stability. Special provisions must be made for the children of sex workers to guarantee their access to quality education, proper nutrition, and protection from social stigma.
Fighting stigma and raising awareness are essential for changing societal attitudes. Public education campaigns are critical to challenging harmful stereotypes, fostering empathy, and shifting the discussion around sex work from moral judgment to a focus on human rights. Training the media is vital for ensuring responsible and respectful reporting. The ongoing work of civil society organizations and sex worker groups, such as the Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee, in leading self-advocacy efforts and confronting societal norms is very important.
Moreover, supporting economic self-sufficiency and genuinely voluntary rehabilitation is essential. This involves providing real vocational training and alternative job opportunities for sex workers who want to leave the profession, ensuring that these transitions are completely voluntary, respectful, and sustainable. Support for microfinance and entrepreneurship can help provide paths to economic self-sufficiency, along with safe housing and strong support networks for those in transition.
Improving law enforcement sensitivity and accountability is essential. Thorough training for police officers is critical to cultivate respect for the rights of sex workers, assist them in telling the difference between consensual adult sex work and human trafficking, and ensure proper investigations of crimes targeting sex workers. Clear systems for reporting police misconduct, along with prompt and transparent disciplinary actions, are vital to rebuilding trust and ending cycles of harassment and impunity.
In the end, these suggested reforms align with international human rights frameworks, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). These agreements uphold the rights to dignity, equality, non-discrimination, health, and work for everyone, without exception. Implementing these strategies is not just a policy decision; it is a necessary commitment to human rights.
CONCLUSION
The journey to ensure dignity for sex workers is not just a social welfare issue; it is a basic human rights concern. Sex workers, both globally and in India, face systemic denials of dignity. They deal with severe social stigma, widespread violence, unclear laws that lead to harassment, and significant obstacles to essential services and labor rights.
Moving forward requires a multi-faceted approach. This includes important legal reforms, especially the decriminalization of consensual adult sex work, alongside improved access to healthcare and social welfare programs. We need to tackle deep-rooted societal stigma through public awareness and media engagement. Additionally, we must provide real economic empowerment initiatives that create dignified, voluntary options for those who want to transition. Crucially, we need a law enforcement culture that prioritizes sensitivity and accountability. This should align with strong international human rights principles.
Achieving this vision is a shared responsibility. The state should shift from punitive measures to protective frameworks. The judiciary must keep interpreting rights in a progressive way. Civil society and sex worker groups must continue their important advocacy work. The public needs to let go of bias and embrace empathy. Only by coming together can we create a future where the dignity of sex workers is not just a legal statement, but a lived experience that ensures respect, safety, and equality for everyone.
REFERENCES
- Zipdo, https://zipdo.co/prostitution-in-india-statistics/ (last visited July 12, 2025)
- Indu Yadav & Sr. Prof. (Dr.) Quaisar Alam, Stigma and Marginalization: Analyzing the Social Perceptions and Legal Frameworks Affecting Minor Female Sex Workers in Urban India, 5 Int’l J. Res. Pub. & Rev. 1412, (2024)
- Girl Rising, https://www.girlrising.org/post/breaking-the-silence-spotlighting-the-lives-and-rights-of-sex-workers-in-india (last visited July 12, 2025)
- Savara Advocates, https://savaraadvocates.com/2025/05/03/prostitution-in-india-legal-or-illegal/ (last visited July 12, 2025)
- Zahra Boroumandfar, Reza Esmaeili & Negar Mohaghegh, The Story of Female Sex Workers in the Shadow of Sex Work Coercion: A Qualitative Study, 27(3) Iran J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 243, (2022)
- Women Prostitution in India – Centre for Public Policy Research (CPPR), https://share.google/t8FG5COxwDt0HyID1, (last visited July 12, 2025)
[1] Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal, AIR 2022 SC 2163
[2] Smt. Afjal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2019 All 175
Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or the materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is personal.
0 Comments