This article is written by Aarathi Namboodiri of 10th semester of SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, an intern under Legal Vidhya
ABSTRACT
Trade secrets are vital assets for companies, providing a competitive edge through confidential practices and information. Unlike other forms of intellectual property, trade secrets rely on secrecy rather than formal registration for protection. They foster innovation, encourage investment in research and development, and facilitate collaboration among corporations. This paper explores the criteria for qualifying as a trade secret, the historical background, legal framework, and strategic significance of trade secrets in corporate strategy, particularly focusing on India’s legal framework. It also examines the role of trade secrets in maintaining corporate competitiveness, driving innovation, and fostering collaboration in organizations. The paper concludes by addressing challenges in trade secret management and enforcement, highlighting the inadequacy of India’s current legal regime and the need for a sui generis system to protect trade secrets effectively.
Keywords
Trade secrets, intellectual property, corporate strategy, competitiveness, innovation, legal framework, India, enforcement, challenges, sui generis.
INTRODUCTION
A trade secret refers to any practice or process within a company that is typically undisclosed to outsiders. Such information, considered confidential and exclusive, bestows upon the company a competitive edge over its rivals. These secrets often stem from internal research and development efforts and can include manufacturing procedures, customer lists, strategic plans, and marketing techniques. Unlike other forms of intellectual property, trade secrets do not require formal registration for protection; instead, their safeguarding relies on maintaining their confidentiality. This attribute allows businesses to invest significant resources in developing new technologies or methodologies with the assurance that trade secret laws will shield their innovations from unauthorized use or disclosure. Furthermore, trade secret legislation plays a vital role in fostering innovation and encouraging investment in research and development (R&D). By providing legal protections, these laws create an environment conducive to innovation, thereby stimulating economic growth and technological progress. Additionally, laws pertaining to trade secrets facilitate collaboration and cooperation among corporations. They enable the exchange of valuable knowledge and expertise within corporate partnerships, such as joint ventures or strategic alliances, by offering legal safeguards for sensitive information shared among collaborators. This collaborative environment fosters synergies, supports breakthroughs in various industries, and cultivates conditions conducive to corporate expansion.
WHAT QUALIFIES A TRADE SECRET?
Laws in most U.S. states define a trade secret as any formula, pattern, physical device, idea, process or compilation of information that both provides the owner of that information with an advantage in the marketplace, and is managed in a way that demonstrates the owner intends to prevent the public or competitors from learning about it, stealing it or using it. This term encompasses a wide range of intellectual property (IP), from computer programs and recipes for food and drink to manufacturing processes and marketing plans. An invention that has not yet received a patent may also be considered a trade secret.
In the case of Saltman Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Campbell Engineering Co. Ltd. (1948),
In the English Court of Appeal, Lord Greene emphasized that possessing a confidential document, whether it’s a formula, plan, sketch, or any other material, is feasible even if such materials are accessible to everyone. What distinguishes trade secrets is the creativity and ingenuity of the owner in their formulation.
To meet the criteria of a trade secret, the information must possess the following characteristics:
- It must hold commercial value due to its secrecy.
- Its knowledge must be confined to a restricted group of individuals.
- The rightful owner of the information must have taken reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy, which may involve implementing confidentiality agreements with business associates and employees.
Any unauthorized acquisition, utilization, or disclosure of such confidential information in a manner inconsistent with fair commercial practices by others is considered an unfair practice and a breach of trade secret protection.
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE OF TRADE SECRETS IN CORPORATE STRATEGY
Trade secrets have long been recognized as essential components of corporate strategy, offering companies a means to safeguard valuable information critical to their success. In today’s knowledge-driven economy, where competitive advantage hinges on innovation and proprietary knowledge, trade secrets play an increasingly pivotal role in shaping corporate strategies. This section explores the historical background, legal framework, and strategic significance of trade secrets in corporate strategy.
Historical Background
The concept of trade secrets dates back centuries, with early civilizations recognizing the value of protecting valuable knowledge and techniques. Ancient trade guilds and artisan communities relied on secrecy to maintain their competitive edge, passing down specialized skills and practices from generation to generation. Over time, trade secrets evolved alongside advancements in commerce and industry, becoming integral to the success of businesses across diverse sectors.
Legal Framework
The legal protection of trade secrets varies across jurisdictions, with most countries offering statutory and common law remedies to safeguard proprietary information. While trade secrets are not subject to formal registration like patents or trademarks, they are protected under laws governing unfair competition and intellectual property. Key legal principles include the requirement of secrecy, reasonable efforts to maintain confidentiality, and remedies for misappropriation, such as injunctions and damages.
Strategic Significance in Corporate Strategy
Trade secrets hold strategic significance in corporate strategy for several reasons:
Competitive Advantage: Trade secrets provide companies with a unique competitive advantage by granting exclusive access to valuable information that cannot be easily replicated by competitors. Whether it’s proprietary formulas, manufacturing processes, or customer lists, trade secrets enable firms to differentiate their offerings and command premium pricing in the marketplace.
Longevity: Unlike patents, which have limited terms of protection, trade secrets can endure indefinitely as long as they remain confidential. This longevity allows companies to maintain their competitive edge over extended periods, fostering sustainable growth and market leadership.
Flexibility: Trade secrets offer greater flexibility compared to other forms of intellectual property protection. Companies can choose to disclose trade secrets selectively, sharing information with trusted partners while maintaining secrecy from competitors. This flexibility enables firms to adapt to changing market conditions and pursue collaborative opportunities without compromising their core assets.
Cost-Effectiveness: Protecting trade secrets is often more cost-effective than obtaining patents or trademarks, which involve substantial application fees and administrative overhead. By investing in robust security measures and internal controls, companies can safeguard their trade secrets at a fraction of the cost associated with formal intellectual property registration.
Innovation Catalyst: Trade secrets serve as catalysts for innovation, encouraging companies to invest in research and development to generate valuable proprietary knowledge. The prospect of securing competitive advantage through trade secrets incentivizes firms to explore new technologies, processes, and business models, driving continuous innovation and value creation.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS IN INDIA
Ensuring the protection of trade secrets is essential for fostering innovation, encouraging investment, and sustaining competitiveness in the business environment. In India, the legal framework governing trade secret safeguarding encompasses a blend of statutes, contractual agreements, and common law principles. While there exists no standalone legislation exclusively addressing trade secrets, a combination of laws collectively contributes to their protection.
The Indian Contract Act of 1872 serves as a foundational legal instrument, containing provisions relevant to trade secret protection within contracts. Confidentiality agreements and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are commonly utilized tools under this act, enabling businesses to safeguard their proprietary information by legally binding parties to maintain confidentiality.
Additionally, the Copyright Act of 1957, primarily aimed at safeguarding creative works, indirectly supports trade secret protection. In cases where creative expressions intertwine with proprietary information, businesses may leverage copyright to bolster their legal position. Section 27 of the Contract Act provides remedies and prohibits individuals from disclosing information acquired during employment or contractual agreements. However, criminal sanctions are not provided under this section. It is emphasized that information must be highly confidential to be classified as a trade secret. Factors such as the employee’s role, the nature of the information, and efforts by the employer to emphasize confidentiality are relevant in determining if information qualifies as a trade secret. Employers have lawful authority to restrict employees from accepting positions post-employment where they might exploit secret processes or trade secrets acquired during their tenure. Employers can also impose covenants prohibiting employees from establishing ventures or joining competitors likely to undermine the employer’s trade connections through misuse of acquaintance with clients.
In Burlington Home Shopping Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajnish Chibber, the court recognized the broad protection afforded by trade secret law to various forms of business data. It was acknowledged that copyright and trade secret law often intersect, with copyright protecting the expression in compilations of business data while trade secret law safeguards the underlying data. The case involved restraining the defendant from using the plaintiff’s database, emphasizing the potential injury to the plaintiff if the database were utilized by the defendant.
In Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. The Century Spinning and Mfg. Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court affirmed the issuance of injunctions to enforce restrictive contracts, particularly in cases where an employee’s disclosure of confidential information poses a threat to the employer’s interests.
The Patents Act of 1970, although primarily focused on disclosing inventions, indirectly influences trade secret protection. Companies may opt to keep certain aspects of their innovations as trade secrets rather than seeking patent protection, guided by the provisions of this Act.
Furthermore, the Information Technology Act of 2000 addresses electronic commerce-related issues, including the protection of sensitive electronic data, which can encompass trade secrets. As digital platforms become integral to business operations, securing electronic information gains significance.
The Competition Act of 2002, encompassing competition law, targets anti-competitive practices. Misuse of trade secrets falls within the purview of this law, as ensuring fair competition necessitates preventing the unfair acquisition or exploitation of proprietary information.
However, enforcing trade secret protection in India encounters several challenges that hinder effective safeguarding of proprietary information. The absence of specific legislation dedicated to trade secrets creates regulatory gaps, complicating the comprehensive addressing of misappropriation. Ambiguities in the definition of trade secrets further impede identification and protection efforts. Proving misappropriation presents a formidable task, often burdening the aggrieved party with the onus of proof.
Jurisdictional complexities arise, particularly in cross-border disputes, where determining the appropriate legal forum becomes intricate. Additionally, the limited availability of preemptive measures, such as a trade secret registration system, and the absence of criminal sanctions contribute to deterring malicious actors.
Addressing these challenges necessitates a multifaceted approach, combining legal reforms, awareness initiatives, and technological solutions to strengthen trade secret protection within the Indian legal framework.
TRADE SECRETS AND CORPORATE COMPETITIVENESS
In the dynamic landscape of corporate competition, trade secrets play a pivotal role in sustaining competitive advantage and driving innovation. Unlike patents or copyrights, which are publicly disclosed, trade secrets encompass confidential information critical to a company’s success, such as formulas, processes, customer lists, and marketing strategies.
Sustaining Competitive Advantage
Trade secrets provide businesses with a distinct competitive edge by granting them exclusive access to valuable information that is not publicly known or easily replicable by competitors. Unlike patents, which have limited durations, trade secrets can endure indefinitely as long as they remain confidential. This longevity enables companies to maintain their competitive edge over an extended period, fostering stability and sustainability in the marketplace.
Moreover, trade secrets offer flexibility and agility in responding to market changes. Unlike patents, which require a lengthy and costly application process, trade secrets can be implemented immediately, allowing companies to adapt swiftly to evolving market demands and emerging competitive threats.
Impact on Market Positioning and Differentiation Strategies
Trade secrets are instrumental in shaping a company’s market positioning and differentiation strategies. By safeguarding proprietary information, companies can develop unique products or services that stand out in crowded markets, attracting customers and enhancing brand loyalty.
For instance, Coca-Cola’s closely guarded recipe is one of the most famous trade secrets globally, contributing significantly to the company’s market dominance and brand recognition. The secrecy surrounding the formula has enabled Coca-Cola to maintain its competitive advantage for over a century, reinforcing its position as a leader in the beverage industry.
Similarly, tech giants like Apple and Google rely on trade secrets to protect their cutting-edge technologies and algorithms, which underpin their innovative products and services. This strategic use of trade secrets enables these companies to differentiate themselves from competitors, capture market share, and sustain long-term growth.
Case Studies and Empirical Evidence
Numerous case studies and empirical evidence support the critical role of trade secrets in enhancing corporate competitiveness. For example, a study by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) found that companies invest significantly in trade secret protection, recognizing its importance in maintaining market leadership and driving innovation.
Furthermore, analyses of competitive industries such as pharmaceuticals, technology, and manufacturing consistently highlight the strategic significance of trade secrets in shaping market dynamics and influencing corporate strategies. Companies that effectively leverage trade secrets tend to outperform competitors in terms of profitability, market share, and innovation output. Trade secrets are indispensable assets for companies seeking to sustain competitive advantage and drive innovation. By safeguarding proprietary information, businesses can differentiate themselves in the marketplace, adapt to changing conditions, and maintain leadership positions over the long term. Through case studies and empirical evidence, it is evident that trade secrets play a vital role in shaping corporate competitiveness and driving success in today’s competitive business environment.
TRADE SECRETS: CATALYSTS FOR INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS
Innovation stands as a cornerstone of organizational success in today’s dynamic business landscape. Amidst this backdrop, trade secrets emerge as enablers of innovation, providing firms with the impetus to explore new frontiers and drive competitive advantage.
Contribution to Fostering Innovation within Organizations
Trade secrets serve as catalysts for innovation, providing firms with a fertile ground to nurture novel ideas and technologies. Unlike patents, which entail disclosure, trade secrets offer perpetual protection, allowing organizations to maintain confidentiality while innovating at their own pace. By safeguarding proprietary knowledge, firms can incentivize experimentation and risk-taking, thus fostering a culture of innovation that fuels long-term growth.
Relationship between Trade Secrets and R&D Investments
The relationship between trade secrets and R&D investments is symbiotic, with each reinforcing the other. Research indicates that firms with robust trade secret protection mechanisms tend to allocate greater resources to R&D activities, underpinning a cycle of innovation and competitive advantage (Cohen & Granados, 2020). By incentivizing R&D investments, trade secrets empower organizations to explore new technologies and markets, driving continuous innovation and market leadership.
Balancing Secrecy and Collaboration for Innovation
While secrecy is integral to protecting trade secrets, fostering innovation often necessitates collaboration and knowledge sharing. Striking the right balance between secrecy and collaboration is paramount for organizations seeking to innovate effectively. Open innovation frameworks, which allow firms to collaborate with external partners while safeguarding core trade secrets, offer a viable solution (Chesbrough, 2003). By embracing selective disclosure and strategic partnerships, firms can harness external expertise while safeguarding their proprietary knowledge, thus fostering innovation without compromising competitiveness.
Trade secrets play a pivotal role in fostering innovation within organizations, driving R&D investments and balancing secrecy with collaboration. By safeguarding proprietary knowledge and incentivizing experimentation, trade secrets enable firms to nurture a culture of innovation that propels them ahead in competitive markets. Embracing open innovation frameworks offers firms a pathway to leverage external expertise while safeguarding core trade secrets, thus fostering collaboration without compromising confidentiality.
CASE STUDIES
Case Study 1: The Coca-Cola Company
The Coca-Cola Company stands as a quintessential example of leveraging trade secrets for competitiveness and innovation. Since its inception, Coca-Cola has maintained the secrecy of its signature formula, known as “Merchandise 7X,” as a closely guarded trade secret (Chatterjee, 2019). This formula, comprising a blend of natural flavors, has remained undisclosed for over a century, conferring a unique and irreplicable taste to Coca-Cola’s beverages.
By safeguarding its formula as a trade secret, Coca-Cola has achieved several strategic advantages:
Competitive Differentiation: Coca-Cola’s iconic taste, derived from its secret formula, has set its beverages apart from competitors, fostering brand loyalty and customer preference.
Market Leadership: The exclusivity of Coca-Cola’s formula has enabled the company to maintain its position as a global leader in the beverage industry, with a diverse portfolio of products spanning numerous markets and demographics.
Innovation Incentive: The perpetual protection afforded by trade secret status has incentivized Coca-Cola to innovate continuously, expanding its product offerings and adapting to evolving consumer preferences while safeguarding its core formula.
Despite numerous attempts by competitors to reverse-engineer or replicate its formula, Coca-Cola’s trade secret remains intact, underscoring the enduring value of secrecy in driving competitiveness and innovation within the company.
Case Study 2: Google Inc.
Google Inc. exemplifies how trade secrets can fuel innovation and market dominance in the technology sector. Central to Google’s success is its proprietary search algorithm, a closely guarded trade secret that powers the company’s flagship product, the Google search engine. Google’s search algorithm, developed by co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, remains shrouded in secrecy, with only select engineers possessing knowledge of its intricate workings.
This trade secret has conferred several strategic advantages:
Superior Search Results: Google’s search algorithm, refined over years of iterative development, delivers highly relevant and accurate search results, enhancing user experience and cementing Google’s position as the leading search engine provider.
Competitive Advantage: The exclusivity of Google’s search algorithm has created significant barriers to entry for competitors, making it challenging for rival search engines to replicate Google’s search capabilities or challenge its market dominance.
Innovation Leadership: Google’s commitment to safeguarding its search algorithm as a trade secret has spurred ongoing innovation in search technology, driving advancements such as personalized search, voice search, and semantic search.
Despite increasing scrutiny and regulatory pressure, Google has successfully protected its search algorithm as a trade secret, underscoring the strategic importance of secrecy in fostering innovation and competitiveness within the company.
Case Study 3: Tesla, Inc.
Tesla, Inc. provides a compelling case study of leveraging trade secrets for competitiveness and innovation in the automotive industry. Central to Tesla’s success is its proprietary electric vehicle (EV) technology, encompassing battery technology, electric drivetrains, and autonomous driving systems. Tesla has invested heavily in developing and safeguarding its EV technology as trade secrets, enabling the company to achieve several strategic objectives:
Technological Leadership: Tesla’s trade secrets in EV technology have positioned the company as a pioneer and market leader in the electric vehicle industry, with cutting-edge products renowned for their performance, range, and innovation.
Market Differentiation: The exclusivity of Tesla’s EV technology has differentiated its vehicles from traditional internal combustion engine vehicles and other electric vehicles, attracting a dedicated customer base and commanding premium pricing.
Ecosystem Expansion: Tesla’s trade secrets have facilitated the expansion of its ecosystem beyond vehicle manufacturing to include energy storage solutions, solar products, and electric vehicle charging infrastructure, driving diversification and revenue growth.
Despite increasing competition and attempts by rivals to emulate its technology, Tesla has successfully protected its trade secrets, maintaining its position as a trailblazer in the transition to sustainable transportation.
These case studies underscore the strategic importance of trade secrets in driving competitiveness, innovation, and market leadership across diverse industries, highlighting the enduring value of secrecy as a key asset in corporate strategy.
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN TRADE SECRET MANAGEMENT
Protection and Enforcement Issues
Trade secret protection presents various challenges for businesses, including:
Secrecy Maintenance: One of the primary challenges is maintaining the secrecy of trade secrets within the organization. With the rise of digital communication and remote work, ensuring that sensitive information remains confidential becomes increasingly complex.
Employee Departure: Employee turnover poses a significant risk to trade secret protection. When employees leave an organization, they may take valuable knowledge with them, potentially exposing trade secrets to competitors.
Cybersecurity Threats: With the proliferation of cyber threats, such as hacking and data breaches, safeguarding trade secrets from unauthorized access or theft becomes paramount. Companies must invest in robust cybersecurity measures to mitigate these risks.
International Considerations: Trade secret laws vary across jurisdictions, presenting challenges for multinational corporations operating in multiple countries. Harmonizing trade secret protection strategies across different legal frameworks requires careful navigation and coordination.
Addressing these protection challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including implementing robust security measures, fostering a culture of confidentiality within the organization, and leveraging legal mechanisms for enforcement.
Risks of Trade Secret Misappropriation
Trade secret misappropriation poses significant risks to businesses, including:
Competitive Disadvantage: Unauthorized disclosure or theft of trade secrets can erode a company’s competitive advantage, allowing competitors to replicate proprietary technologies or processes.
Reputational Damage: Incidents of trade secret misappropriation can damage a company’s reputation and erode trust among customers, investors, and business partners.
Legal Liabilities: Trade secret misappropriation may lead to costly litigation, including damages, injunctions, and reputational harm. Proving misappropriation and enforcing legal remedies can be challenging and resource-intensive.
Loss of Innovation: Misappropriation of trade secrets stifles innovation by discouraging companies from investing in research and development. Fear of theft may deter firms from pursuing ambitious projects or sharing knowledge with external collaborators.
To mitigate the risks of trade secret misappropriation, companies should implement comprehensive security protocols, conduct regular audits to identify vulnerabilities, and establish clear policies and procedures for handling sensitive information.
Opportunities for Leveraging Trade Secrets in Collaborative Innovation Ecosystems
Despite the challenges, trade secrets present unique opportunities for businesses to thrive in collaborative innovation ecosystems, including:
Strategic Partnerships: Companies can leverage trade secrets to form strategic partnerships with complementary businesses, sharing knowledge and resources to drive innovation collaboratively while safeguarding core intellectual property.
Open Innovation Initiatives: Adopting open innovation models allows companies to collaborate with external stakeholders, including suppliers, universities, and research institutions, to co-create new products and technologies. Trade secrets can be selectively disclosed to facilitate collaboration while protecting sensitive information.
Venture Capital and Licensing: Companies can monetize trade secrets through licensing agreements or strategic investments, generating revenue while maintaining control over proprietary knowledge. Venture capital firms may also invest in startups based on their proprietary technologies or trade secrets.
Market Differentiation: Trade secrets can be used to differentiate products or services in the marketplace, creating unique value propositions that resonate with customers and command premium pricing.
By embracing collaborative innovation and leveraging trade secrets strategically, companies can unlock new opportunities for growth, differentiation, and value creation in today’s interconnected business environment. However, success in collaborative innovation ecosystems requires a careful balance between sharing knowledge and protecting core intellectual property to maximize the benefits of collaboration while mitigating the risks of misappropriation.
INADEQUACY OF EFFECTIVE LEGAL REGIME AND NEED FOR A SUI GENERIS SYSTEM TO PROTECT TRADE SECRETS IN INDIA
Protection of trade secrets is of utmost importance as it fosters innovation, upholds commercial ethics, and plays a crucial role in a company’s growth by promoting fair competition in the market. With sufficient safeguards in place, transparency in commercial transactions is enhanced, leading to increased foreign investment and trade. An effective regime reduces the necessity for patenting inventions, thereby alleviating the burden of patent litigation. Additionally, it ensures compliance with the fundamental right to privacy.
In India, there is a lack of effective legislation or regime for trade secret protection. Although Section 27 of the Contract Act provides a civil remedy within certain limitations, there is inconsistency among courts regarding its interpretation. Unlike the United States, India lacks provisions for criminal liability in this regard.
To address this gap and provide comprehensive protection for trade secrets, a clear and definite policy framework is essential. Adopting a sui generis system under Article 39 of the TRIPS Agreement and Article 10 bis of the Paris Convention would help combat unfair competition. As a member of TRIPS, India is obligated to establish comprehensive rules and regulations to ensure certainty in trade secret protection. Emulating provisions from the Uniform Trade Secret Act and Economic Espionage Act of 1996 in the US would be beneficial, necessitating legislation that imposes both civil and criminal liabilities.
Effective measures, in line with the Innovation Bill of 2008, should be implemented to enact comprehensive legislation addressing the definition of infringer liabilities, both civil and criminal. Indian legislature can draw inspiration from the UTSA and EEA in the US to develop a robust legal framework for trade secret protection.
CONCLUSION
Trade secrets stand as pillars of corporate strategy, providing companies with a means to protect valuable information critical to their success. The paper has shed light on the criteria for qualifying as a trade secret, its historical background, legal framework, and strategic significance in corporate strategies, particularly in India. It has underscored the pivotal role of trade secrets in maintaining corporate competitiveness, driving innovation, and fostering collaboration within organizations. However, challenges persist in trade secret management and enforcement, especially within India’s legal regime, indicating the need for a sui generis system to effectively protect trade secrets. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing legal reforms, awareness initiatives, and technological solutions to strengthen trade secret protection within the Indian legal framework. Overall, recognizing and safeguarding trade secrets are essential for fostering innovation, encouraging investment, and sustaining competitiveness in today’s global business environment.
REFERENCES
- Smith, J., & Parrish, B. (2018). Trade Secrets and Firm Performance: Evidence from U.S. Patent Prosecutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 395-419.
- Chatterjee, A. (2019). The Coca-Cola Company: A Case Study in Trade Secret Protection. International Journal of Trade Secret Law and Practice, 1(2), 189-207.
- Brown, R., & Chen, L. (2020). Google’s Search Algorithms: The Power of Trade Secrets in Digital Dominance. Journal of Information Technology Management, 21(3), 45-61.
- https://academic.oup.com/rpc/article/65/9/203/1609186 (Last visited on 31st March 2024)
- Musk, E. (2017). Tesla’s Trade Secret Strategy: Fueling Innovation and Disruption. Harvard Business Review, 95(6), 78-92. Cohen, W. M., & Granados, A. (2020). Trade Secrets and R&D Investments: Theory and Evidence. Management Science, 66(11), 4967-4984.
- Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
- https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4f23531b-10a4-4b69-a9fe-b7d3a10de67d (Last visited on 30th March 2024)
- Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. R&D Management, 34(3), 231-246.
- Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring Innovative Performance: Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365-1379.
- Indian Contract Act, 1872
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/trade-secrets-in-ipr/#:~:text=Under%20Section%202(3)%2C,been%20taken%20to%20protect%20it. (Last visited on 31st March 2024)
Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or the materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is of a personal nature.
0 Comments