PERJURY IS A SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE, WHICH CANNOT BE REMEDIED, MAKING A FALSE STATEMENT TO THE COURT HAS TO INVITE ADVERSE ACTION:DELHI HIGH COURT.

PERJURY IS A SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE, WHICH CANNOT BE REMEDIED, MAKING A FALSE STATEMENT TO THE COURT HAS TO INVITE ADVERSE ACTION:DELHI HIGH COURT.

The Delhi High Court while observing that perjury is a very serious criminal offence, and it cannot be remedied, said that making false statements to the court must necessarily invite adverse actions. Justice Sanjeev Narula, in his statement, said that false affidavits filed in the court are a serious offence, Read more

Delhi High Court Restrains 40 Rogue Websites From Illegally Streaming Content Of Netflix, Universal City Studios & Other Entertainment Companies

Delhi High Court Restrains 40 Rogue Websites From Illegally Streaming Content Of Netflix, Universal City Studios & Other Entertainment Companies.

The Delhi High Court recently issued a significant ruling that will impact the entertainment industry in India. The court granted an injunction against several rogue websites that had been streaming and hosting pirated versions of movies and TV shows produced by Netflix and Universal City Studios Entertainment. The court found Read more

At the discharge stage or when exercising its powers under S. 482 CrPC, the High Courts have very little jurisdiction: In light of Central Bureau of Investigation v. Aryan Singh, the Supreme Court

At the discharge stage or when exercising its powers under S. 482 CrPC, the High Courts have very little jurisdiction: In light of Central Bureau of Investigation v. Aryan Singh, the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court clarifies High Courts’ Jurisdiction at Discharge Stage or When Exercising S. 482 CrPC Powers in Central Bureau of Investigation v. Aryan Singh. In the matter of Central Bureau of Investigation v. Aryan Singh, the Supreme Court of India recently rendered a historic decision that clarified the High Courts’ Read more

Protection Order Under the DV Act: Section 468 CrPC Only Applies At the Cognizance Stage Under Section 32 Of The DV Act, Not Before It: High Court of Patna

Protection Order Under the DV Act: Section 468 CrPC Only Applies At the Cognizance Stage Under Section 32 Of The DV Act, Not Before It: High Court of Patna.

The Patna High Court recently ruled that Section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prohibits taking cognizance after the statute of limitations has expired, only applies to domestic violence cases at the stage of the Domestic Violence Act’s Section 32 (cognizance and proof of a breach of a protection Read more