CASE NUMBER WP Crl. No. 9/1994 EQUIVALENT CITATION 1994 AIR 1349, 1994 SCC (4) 260 BENCH M.N.VENKATACHALLIAH (CJ), S. MOHAN (J), A.S. ANAND (J) DECIDED ON 25 April 1994 GUIDELINES FOR ARREST FACTS The petitioner, a 28-year-old guy who was registered as an advocate. In order to inquire about a Read more
Introduction : Lt. Col. Nitisha and Ors vs Union of India is a landmark case in India that dealt with the issue of gender discrimination in the Indian Army. The case was filed by three serving women officers in the Army who challenged the Army’s policy of denying them permanent Read more
Introduction: Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb[1] is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India on March 10, 2021. The case deals with the question of whether the term ‘terrorism’ can be applied to a person who has not committed any terrorist act, but who has Read more
IN THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA GANESHA V. SHARANAPPA AND ANOTHER CITATION: 2014 ALLMR 392 (Cri), I (2014) CCR 121 (SC), 2013 (4) MLJ 757 (Cri), 2013 (14) SCALE 59, (2014) 1 SCC 87 BENCH: CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT: NOVEMBER 19, 2013 APPELLANT: GANESHA Read more
Case Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Vs. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas Bench The case was heard by a bench of judges in the Gujarat High Court, which included Justice Anant S. Dave and Justice S.G. Shah. Parties Plaintiff -: Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Defendant -: Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas Citation (2010) 1 GLR 385 Introduction Read more
Case Name: Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras Equivalent Citation: AIR 1950 SC 124: 1950 SCR 594. Date of Judgement: 26 May 1950 Court: Supreme Court of India Case no.: Petition no. XVI of 1950 Case type: Writ of Prohibition and Certiorari Petitioner: Romesh Thappar Respondent: The State of Madras Read more
GENERAL INFORMATION NAME OF THE CASE VISHAKHA AND ORS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN CITATION AIR 1997 SC 3011 DATE OF THE JUDGEMENT 13 AUGUST 1997 PETITIONER VISHAKHA & ORS. RESPONDENT STATE OF RAJASTHAN BENCH J.S. VERMA (CHIEF JUSTICE), SUJATA V. MANOHAR, B.N. KIRPAL STATUETES/ CONSTITUTION INVOLVED INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Read more
FACT OF THE CASE ISSUE RASIED 2 . What is the extent to which the Parliament can exercise its power to amend the Constitution? Contentions of the Petitioners Contentions of the Respondents RATIO DECIDENDI ( 7:6 ) JUDGEMENT The thirteen-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Keshwanand Bharti Case 1973 by a majority of 7:6 held Read more
PIL in front of the Calcutta High Court against the rule that people who go to court have to reveal their caste. The petition expressed disappointment that this practise remained even 75 years after India gained its independence. An application for revision of the Calcutta High Court’s presenting form, which Read more
