Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
      • Bail
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

CASE IMPRTANT

LEGAL NEWS

PIL in front of the Calcutta High Court against the rule that people who go to court have to reveal their caste.

PIL in front of the Calcutta High Court against the rule that people who go to court have to reveal their caste. The petition expressed disappointment that this practise remained even 75 years after India gained its independence. An application for revision of the Calcutta High Court’s presenting form, which Read more…

By Admin, 3 yearsDecember 4, 2022 ago
Company Law Top Stories

Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd (1897) A.C.22

Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd (1897) A.C.22 The principle of separate legal entity was explained and emphasized in the famous case of Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. Fact of the case Salomon was a leather merchant, he was sole proprietor of his business. In 1892, he decided to Read more…

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 25, 2022 ago

Visitor Count
2200803
Users Today : 3985
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

  • 4 – Week Certificate Course on PoSH
  • About
  • Advisory Board
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact Us
  • Contents
  • Core Team
  • Disclaimer Policy
  • Executive Committee
  • Founders
  • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • Internship
  • Legal News Interns
  • Legal Vidhiya
  • Legal Vidhiya : A Place Where Journey Begins
  • Legal Vidhiya Upcoming Events
  • My Calendar
  • OpportunityAdda
  • Our Team
  • Prime Jurist
  • Privacy Policy
  • Research Interns
  • Section 1 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Terms of Use
  • The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Virtual Internship Opportunity at Legal Vidhiya: Apply by June 28
  • Youtube
Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle