Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

Article 370 case: There is a difference between existence of power and its abuse

ARTICLE 370 CASE: THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXISTENCE OF POWER AND ITS ABUSE, SAYS SUPREME COURT
LEGAL NEWS

ARTICLE 370 CASE: THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXISTENCE OF POWER AND ITS ABUSE, SAYS SUPREME COURT

On Wednesday, in the case of, In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said there should be no confusion with the Central government’s legal powers to repeal Article 370 and the alleged abuse of process. The Constitution Bench of D.Y. Chandrachud (C.J.I.) and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai, Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsAugust 16, 2023 ago
Article 370 case: There is a difference between existence of power and its abuse, says Supreme Court.
LEGAL NEWS

Article 370 case: There is a difference between existence of power and its abuse, says Supreme Court.

There should be no confusion with the Central goverment’s legal powers to abrogate Article  370 and any alleged abuse of process in doing so, the Supreme Court remarked on  Wednesday. [In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution].  A Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsAugust 16, 2023 ago

Visitor Count
3932876
Users Today : 11435
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle