Some of the Scientific researches show that the children’s raised by same gender parents don’t have any ill effects on raised children so the same gender marriage should be provided legitimacy:- Stated in a research reports presented before Hon’ble Supreme Court  by Dr. Menaka Guruswamy.

In the case of marriage equality as it was end day for the debates on this case the Appellant side sumbitted their answers on the questions raised by Respondent side on the privileges of same sex married couple’s adoption and child birth’s sop’s and powers described by the Appellant side, and on rules clarity between things.

The sitting judges C.J.I D.Y CHANDRACHUD, Justice S.k. kaul, Justice S.R Bhat, Justice H.kohli and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha listened all the arguments of both the parties and booked the next day for final decision

Researches have proved that there is no harmful effect on children who are given birth and raised by same gender married couple’s :- Sr Adv Dr Menaka Guruswamy

The Advocate who represented the Commission for Protection of Child Rights in her researched reports which focused on the answers on the effects of those children   who are children of same sex couples.  The report contain diversified researches also the judgements passed by different legal bodies in the South African and Brazilian countries explaining the effects on those childrens who receives same gender parental guidance.

Also highlighted a  Indian psychiatric society which stated the presence of 7000 psychiatric experts throughout India then Sr Adv Menaka Guruswamy stated that there is no existence of any proof which provides description of humans LGBTQIA+ domain cannot participate in parenting a child. And also stated that The same society stated it is very much beneficial as it helps in merger of these people in mainstream.After which she pointout the characteristics which existed as a common characteristic throughout in these studies.:-

(i)The Act of Adopting or parenting doesn’t have any wrong effect on children.

ii)Less presence of security for children given birth by same gender married couple’s can have wrong effects on children.

iii)  people Gender are developed in early time so if they are not seen as other common people would result in less positive support in opposition of discrimination.

Non functionality shouldn’t be a way of protection in opposition of legal system checking:- Sr Adv S.kirpal.

The legislature could have the option of ignorance, but judiciary does not have option of ignorance.:- Adv A.katju

The Menaka Guruswamy in her complete report sumbitted in accordance to answers to other parties raised questions. In respect of rules description the judiciary shouldn’t consider the matter.

To which the Adv A Katju stated that Appleants are not avoiding the imperatives on rules but they just stated that judiciary will have have to normalize the issue the issue could have raised if these types of matters could have brought in forefront.

Advocate K. Nundy also added in her presented reports  and described that Chapter 3 of SMA (part 15-18) made it necessary for consideration of marriages and these regulations were gender common and may come to the Appellant’s support being read into SMA. Stated an  example of the Parsi marriage laws, which were regulated by English law in respect to their structure and also were away from an y ethnicity derivations.

Name :- Shivraj Kadlimatti, Class :- 2^nd year B.B.A.L.L.B, College :- Army Law college, Pune intern under legal vidhiya

Admin