"Higher Religious Observance": Madras High Court Allows Devotee Rolling Ceremony Regarding Questionable Leaves On Which Food Was Ingested By Others

“Higher Religious Observance”: Madras High Court Allows Devotee Rolling Ceremony Regarding Questionable Leaves On Which Food Was Ingested By Others

A person’s right to privacy extends beyond their gender and sexual orientation to include their spiritual orientation, as noted by the Madras High Court in a recent ruling. This suggests that everyone has the right to practice their religion in any way they see fit. “If the right to privacy Read more

In a contempt case involving the removal of trees in Delhi Ridge, the vice chairman of the DDA tells the Supreme Court, "Juniors, Contractor Did It."

In a contempt case involving the removal of trees in Delhi Ridge, the vice chairman of the DDA tells the Supreme Court, “Juniors, Contractor Did It.”

 The Supreme Court hinted on Tuesday, May 14, in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors, that it might bring criminal contempt charges against the Vice Chairman of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for the extensive tree-cutting that is occurring in Delhi’s Ridge Forest area, which Read more

It cannot be doubted that a dispute which is purely civil in nature has been given a color of criminal prosecution alleging fraud and criminal breach of trust by misusing the tool of criminal law: Supreme Court

It cannot be doubted that a dispute which is purely civil in nature has been given a color of criminal prosecution alleging fraud and criminal breach of trust by misusing the tool of criminal law: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on 15th May,2024, Wednesday had given its judgment on the  case of  C. SUBBIAH @ KADAMBUR JAYARAJ AND OTHERS versus THE SUPREINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS. In the case the Supreme Court had explained in its judgment that how this civil dispute has been given a color Read more

Any mere omission which are there used for framing points in determination will not spoil the First Appellant court's judgment : Supreme Court

Any mere omission which are there used for framing points in determination will not spoil the First Appellant court’s judgment : Supreme Court

The two judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprised of justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar gave it’s judgment on Friday, 10th May, 2024 for the case of  Mrugendra Indravadan Mehta and others vs Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. The Supreme Court had mentioned many important points in the judgment but Read more