Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

Case Laws

CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD.VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case Laws

CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD.VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

INTRODUCTION The constitution of our country guarantees the right to equality as a fundamental right to every citizen. Article 15 prohibits discrimination on the grounds of sex, race, caste, sex and place of birth. Article 16 provides equality of opportunity in the cases of public employment. Equality before law means Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Shah Faesal v. Union of India, Writ petition (civil) no. 1099 of 2019 , Case on Article 370

INTRODUCTION On January 26, 1950, the Indian Constitution came into effect, bringing with it the special clause known as Article 370 that grants Jammu and Kashmir a special status. The article, which exempts the State of Jammu and Kashmir from all provisions of the Indian Constitution save for Articles 1 Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors. versus Union of India and Ors.
Case Laws

Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors. versus Union of India and Ors.

Case Name: Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors. versus Union of India and Ors.(2022) 4 SCC 1 Equivalent Citations: 2022 SCC Online SC 75 Date of Judgment: 20/01/2022 Case No.: Writ Petition (C) No. 961 of 2021 Case Type: Writ Petition Petitioners: Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors. Respondents: Union of India Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Bandhua Mukti Morcha V. Union Of India & Ors.(1984 AIR 802), Eliminate the use of child labours under the age of 14

INTRODUCTION : Name Of The Case : Bandhua Mukti Morcha V. Union Of  India & Ors. (1984) Equivalent Citation : 1984 AIR 802, 1984 SCR (2) 67 Court : Supreme Court of India Bench : Bhagwati, P.N. Pathak, R.S. Sen, Amarendra Nath (J) Petitioner : Bandhua Mukti Morcha The entire Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Brij Bhushan Sharma v. Delhi, (1950) SCR 605, Fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and reasonable restrictions

CASE NAME Brij Bhushan Sharma v. Delhi, 1950 EQUIVALENT CITATION (1950) SCR 605 DATE OF JUDGMENT 5th December 1950 CASE NO. Criminal Appeal No. 64 of 1949 CASE TYPE criminal appeal before Supreme Court PETITIONER BRIJ BHUSHAN AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT THE STATE OF DELHI BENCH/JUDGE Chief Justice Sir Saiyid Fazl Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

CHACKO AND ORS. V. MAHADEVAN

CASE NAME: CHACKO AND ORS. V. MAHADEVAN LEGAL MAXIM: INTODUCTION: In this case the contract is declared void because one or both parties were mentally incapable of entering into a contract. The name of the case is Chakho & Ors v. Mahadevan.[1] Due to Alcoholic psychosis brought on by alcohol Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803), Doctrine of Judicial Review in United States

Introduction: Facts of the case: Issue raised: The following are the main issues raised in the case, Contentions of the Petitioners: Overall, the Petitioners argued that they had a legal right to their commissions and that the Supreme Court had the power to enforce that right by issuing a writ Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

AIR INDIA v. NARGESH MEERZA , 1981, Unconstitutionality of clause regarding retirement and pregnancy

SUBJECT :  The judgment is based on gender justice and discrimination based on the biological features of women. INTRODUCTION: In today’s world discrimination based on gender is an offense in modern society. Although India has developed a lot still there exist some flaws in the system. People are reluctant to Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Case Laws

(Nicaragua v. The United States of America,1986)

CASE CONCERNING MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (Nicaragua v. The United States of America,1986) Case Name Case Concerning Military And Paramilitary Activities In And Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. The United States of America, 1986) Equivalent Citation Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (The Republic of Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
SECR.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE VS. BABITA PUNIYA 17 FEBRUARY, 2020,CIVIL APPEAL NOS 9367-9369 OF 2011, Rights Of Female Officers In The Armed Forces
Case Laws

SECR.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE VS. BABITA PUNIYA 17 FEBRUARY, 2020,CIVIL APPEAL NOS 9367-9369 OF 2011, Rights Of Female Officers In The Armed Forces

Introduction The case of Secr., Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya on 17 February, 2020, Civil Appeal Nos 9367-9369 of 2011 is a landmark case relating to gender discrimination in the Indian armed forces. The case included a test to the strategy of the Indian Armed force which denied long-lasting Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 195 196 197 … 202 Next

Visitor Count
3865251
Users Today : 6288
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle