Introduction: Facts of the case: Issue raised: The following are the main issues raised in the case, Contentions of the Petitioners: Overall, the Petitioners argued that they had a legal right to their commissions and that the Supreme Court had the power to enforce that right by issuing a writ Read more
SUBJECT : The judgment is based on gender justice and discrimination based on the biological features of women. INTRODUCTION: In today’s world discrimination based on gender is an offense in modern society. Although India has developed a lot still there exist some flaws in the system. People are reluctant to Read more
CASE CONCERNING MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (Nicaragua v. The United States of America,1986) Case Name Case Concerning Military And Paramilitary Activities In And Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. The United States of America, 1986) Equivalent Citation Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (The Republic of Read more
Introduction The case of Secr., Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya on 17 February, 2020, Civil Appeal Nos 9367-9369 of 2011 is a landmark case relating to gender discrimination in the Indian armed forces. The case included a test to the strategy of the Indian Armed force which denied long-lasting Read more
![FOSS V. HARBOTTLE [1843] 67 ER 189, (1843) 2 HARE 461](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Screenshot-2023-04-08-134520-360x240.png)
FOSS V. HARBOTTLE [1843] 67 ER 189, (1843) 2 HARE 461 Introduction: Foss v. Harbottle is a landmark case in the field of corporate law. The case was heard in 1843 in the Court of Chancery in England. The case was based on the principles of minority shareholder rights and Read more
Donoghue, a Scottish dispute, is a famous case in English law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular Court House of lords Full case name M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) v Stevenson Decided 26 May 1932 Citation(s) [1932] UKHL 100 [1932] SC (HL) Read more
CASE NAME Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, 1992 EQUIVALENT CITATION 1992 AIR 1858, 1992 SCR (3) 658 DATE OF JUDGMENT 30 JULY 1992 Case no. (1992) 3 SCC Case type : Writ petition (civil) case Petitioner MISS MOHINI JAIN RESPONDENT STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. BENCH/JUDGE KULDIP SINGH(J), SAHAI, R.M. Read more
Section 79 if IPC 1860 is a provision which states that if an act is done under mistake of fact then no punishment will be given. It will be considered under good faith. Case Analysis: State of Orissa Vs Ram Bahadur Thapa AIR 1960, Ori 161, 1960 Cri LJ Read more
Vikas Kirshanrao Gawali v. State of Maharashtra on 4 March 2021 In supreme court of India CASE NAME Vikas krishanrao Gawali vs state of Maharashtra 2021 EQUILIANT CITATION Miscellaneous Application No 902/2021 in W.P.(C) No. 980/2019 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 21 October 2021 COURT Supreme court of India CASE NO Writ petition (civil) Read more
(Landmark Judgement for awarding Interim Compensation to Rape Victims) Citation: AIR (1996) SCC (1) 490 Petitioner: Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam Respondent: Miss Subhra Chakraborty Bench: J. Kuldip Singh, J. Saghir Ahmad Introduction: The instant case is an important remark for establishing the offence of rape as against the Right of Life Read more
