Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006)(right to free speech and the right to information) Introduction The landmark Indian constitutional law case of Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006) deals with the right to free speech and the right to information. Kuldip Nayar, a seasoned journalist, filed a public Read more…
Case Name : UNION OF INDIA v. ALAPAN VANDYOPADHYAY Equivalent citation: SLP © No. 18338/2021 Date of Judgement: 6th January 2022 Court: The Supreme Court of India Case no: Appeal No. 197 of 2022 Case Type: Civil Appeal Petitioner: Union of India Respondent: Alapan Vandyopadhyay Bench: Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice Read more…
COLOMBIA V. PERU (ASYLUM CASE) INTRODUCTION: Asylum, this concept can be traced a long way back, and we can say that there will be a difference between the concept of asylum then and asylum now, but the basic idea of asylum will remain the same. Asylum in simple terms can Read more…
Written By DIKSHA GUPTA ,2nd Sem OF NIMS SCHOOL OF LAW PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK V. THE REGISTER, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND OTHERS CASE NAME PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK V. REGISTRAR SOCIETIES AND OTHERS CITATION 2022 SSC Online SC 28 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 11 JANUARY 2022 CASE TYPE CIVIL APPEAL Read more…
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006) 7 SCC 1 Introduction The landmark Indian constitutional law case of Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006) deals with the right to free speech and the right to information. Kuldip Nayar, a seasoned journalist, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) with the Read more…
Introduction: Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) is a landmark case in the history of Indian constitutional law. It dealt with the issue of the power of the Indian Parliament to amend the Constitution and curtail the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. The judgment had far-reaching Read more…
Case – In Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) Case type – Suo Motu criminal contempt proceeding Bench – B.R. Gavai J., Krishna Murari J., Arun Mishra J. Parties – Respondent -: Adv. Prashant Bhusan, Twitter India Citation -SCM (CRL.)No. 000001 -/2020 Facts 27th June , 2020-: “When historians in future look back Read more…
A case regarding whether the child adopted after the death of a government employee is entitled to a pension was decided on 17 January 2023 by the two-judge bench, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, and Justice B.V. Nagarathna. The Appellant (Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar) was represented by the learned counsel, Mrs. K. Read more…
GENERAL INFORMATION NAME OF THE CASE VISHAKHA AND ORS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN CITATION AIR 1997 SC 3011 DATE OF THE JUDGEMENT 13 AUGUST 1997 PETITIONER VISHAKHA & ORS. RESPONDENT STATE OF RAJASTHAN BENCH J.S. VERMA (CHIEF JUSTICE), SUJATA V. MANOHAR, B.N. KIRPAL STATUETES/ CONSTITUTION INVOLVED INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Read more…
GENERAL INFORMATION NAME OF THE CASE I.C. GOLAKNATH AND ORS. V. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. CITATION 1967 AIR 1643, 1967 SCR (2) 762 DATE OF THE JUDGEMENT 27/02/1967 PETITIONER I.C. GOLAKNATH AND ORS. RESPONDENT STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. BENCH SUBBA RAO, K.N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH, S.M. SIKRI, Read more…