constitutional validity of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953

I.C GOLAKNATH & Ors. V. State of Punjab (1967) (constitutional validity of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953)

Introduction: Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) is a landmark case in the history of Indian constitutional law. It dealt with the issue of the power of the Indian Parliament to amend the Constitution and curtail the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. The judgment had far-reaching Read more…

Supreme Court held: If a proposal made by the defense attorney to a witness during cross-examination is found to be incriminating, the accused would be bound by it and would be unable to flee: in light of BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Supreme Court held: If a proposal made by the defense attorney to a witness during cross-examination is found to be incriminating, the accused would be bound by it and would be unable to flee: in light of BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

In a recent Reportable Judgement (BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[1]), the Supreme Court observed that suggestions made by the defence attorney to a witness during cross-examination, if found to be incriminating in nature, would unquestionably bind the accused and that the accused cannot escape on the Read more…