INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE GAMING INDUSTRY

This article is written by Smriti Sen of 5^th Year of Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow, an intern under Legal Vidhiya

ABSTRACT

The video gaming industry has been growing at a phenomenal rate, with powerful innovation working in the background, such as Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence, and so forth. This growth underlines the necessity of bringing legal protection to these creative elements of the game as in code, character, storyline, artwork, music, and trademarks by using Intellectual Property Rights. IPR not only protects the creations of developers but also stimulates innovation and investment. This article discusses the IPR in gaming, showing various types of intellectual property including trademarks, copyright, patents, designs, and trade secrets. It highlights the significance of IPR in protection of creative works and giving creators economic incentives to create unique content. It also emphasizes upon some common IPR issues associated with the gaming industry, including copyright infringement, trademark disputes, patent trolls, piracy, and challenges associated with user-generated content. This article further measures the global view on the IPR on gaming, wherein the system is reforming in light of promotion of digital rights management, licensing agreements, and cross-border cooperation. Trends pertaining to the future in the context of IPR and gaming have been discussed respecting aspects like NFT, blockchain, e-sports, streaming, AI-generated content, AR/VR, and related legal developments. This provides an incremental view with a view to educating stakeholders for the critical role of IPR structuring, in times to come, the future of gaming.

Keywords

Gaming industry, Intellectual Property Rights, trademarks, copyright, patents, designs, trade secrets.

INTRODUCTION

The game industry has been expanding and developing quickly over the past few years. With rapid technological advancements, such as Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence (AI), etc., the gaming industry has experienced a remarkable transformation. The video game industry is expected to generate 282.30 billion US dollars in sales by the end of the fiscal year 2024. Between 2024 and 2027, it is anticipated to expand at an annual pace of 8.76%, with a predicted market volume of 363.20 billion US dollars.[1] Now, with this exponential growth in the gaming sector, it has also become indispensable that this industry is legally protected, especially by the laws relating to Intellectual Property Rights, as these rights play a very pivotal role in safeguarding the intellectual creations of the game. IPR in gaming would then literally mean the rights legally granted to video game creators to protect: code, characters, storyline, artwork, music, and trademarks of the game.

IPR in gaming allows developers and publishers to protect the code, characters, storyline, artwork, music, and trademarks of the game and enables them to monetize these products, as well as prevent unauthorized use or handmade copying of their work. IPR encourages creativity and investment by recognizing and rewarding the intellectual effort and resources that go into game development.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to evaluate the relationship between the law on intellectual property and the rapidly evolving gaming industry. The purpose of this article is to discuss how the IPR safeguards developers’ intellectual properties, such as code, graphics, soundtracks, and storylines and therefore encourages innovation and creativity. The article will also touch on problems associated with IPR in game industry including copyright infringement, piracy or striking a balance between creators’ rights and fair use by consumers. By giving a comprehensive view, this article wants to educate stakeholders about why IPR is essential for shaping future games. Hence, this research focuses on-

i.          The significance of IPR in Gaming.

ii.         IPR challenges in the Gaming Industry.

iii.        Addressing complexities related to IPRs in Global Market.

iv.        Future trends in IPR & Gaming.

TYPES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES IN GAMING

Trademark

According to Section. 2(zb) of The Trade Marks Act, 1999, “trade mark” means a mark capable of being represented graphically and which is capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others and may include shape of goods, their packaging and combination of colours.[2] Trademarks are protected by intellectual property rights.

The gaming industry relies heavily on trademarks when it comes to protecting intellectual property rights of game titles, characters, logos, and other unique elements. Trademarks help consumers recognize the originality of a particular game and distinguish it from others in the market, which prevents confusion and secures investments made by developers and publishers. For instance, famous gaming franchises such as “Pokémon” or “Mario Bros.” are largely dependent on trademark protection for sustaining their brand value and market reach. This legal system is beneficial in promoting inventiveness as well as encouraging innovation in the sector while protecting creators from unauthorized use or infringement by rivals.

Copyright

Copyright refers to the legal term that protects authors’ and artists’ ownership rights over their own creative works. It protects a wide variety of creative works, including computer programs, databases, ads, maps, technical drawings, paintings, sculptures, music, films, and books.

In the gaming industry, copyright is a measure under which the law secures original works, including, video games. It further protects various elements of a game, such as the code, graphics, characters, musical pieces involved, or even the storyline. The principal purpose of copyright law is in safeguarding the intellectual property of game developers and publishers as well as enhance creativity and innovation by having a legal procedure against infringement.

Patents

A patent is a type of intellectual property which gives an inventor the exclusive rights to their invention. It guarantees the inventor to exclude others to use, make and sell his invention for commercial purposes for a specific period of time.

A patent in reference to the gaming sector, largely mean the legal protection given to the inventors over new and resourceful technologies, systems, methods, or designs used in the creation and operation of video games. These include unique game mechanics, algorithms, hardware, software, and even user interface. A patent in reference to the gaming sector, largely mean the legal protection given to the inventors over new and resourceful technologies, systems, methods, or designs used in the creation and operation of video games. These include unique game mechanics, algorithms, hardware, software, and even user interface.  Patent holders enjoy exclusive rights to use, make, and market their inventions. This stops others from copying or creating the same thing without the approval of the patent holder. Such safeguards spark creativity and let creators or firms reap full money rewards. This fuels a vibrant competitive mood in the game world.

Design

As per Section. 2(d) of The Designs Act, 2000, “Design” means features of shape, pattern, configuration, ornament or composition of colours or lines which is applied in three dimensional or two dimensional or in both the forms using any of the process whether manual, chemical, mechanical, separate or combined which in the finished article appeal to or judged wholly by the eye.[3]

In the gaming sector, design as intellectual property refers to the legal protection of the creative elements that comprise a video game. Design covers visual components like character models, environmental pieces of art, and the interface layout, as well as it includes the abstract elements of any game like the mechanics of the gameplay, storyline, and general feel of the game. These elements are protected under intellectual property laws from unauthorized use, copying, or reproduction, and thereby the creators and the developers are assured of exclusive rights to their innovative designs. This will foster creativity and investment in new ideas by allowing creators the possibility of gaining financially from their original works, excluding others who may want to exploit the designs without authority.

Trade Secret

Trade secrets are confidential business information which may be sold or licensed. It gives an upper hand over others in the gaming industry. Its application includes uncommon game mechanics, proprietary algorithms, source code, design documents, and marketing strategies. Unlike other forms of intellectual property, a trade secret is not registered; their existence depends on secrecy itself. The information within such companies is protected by NDAs and tight internal security measures. In case the disclosure or misappropriation of a trade secret occurs, the owner can take legal action to prevent further unauthorized use and pursue damages. The preservation of a trade secret prevents the loss associated with disclosure but sustains innovation and competitive advantage in the industry for a gaming company.

IMPORTANCE OF IPR IN THE GAMING INDUSTRY

• Protection of Creative Works: IPR ensures that elements such as characters, storylines, music, and graphics in a game are defended against unauthorized use. This protection promotes creativity and new ideas in the industry. It lets creators know that their unique work will not be used by others.
• Economic Incentive: By securing exclusive rights to their creations, game developers and publishers can generate revenue through sales, licensing, and merchandising. This financial reward incentivizes further investment in game development, leading to a thriving industry.
• Market Differentiation: Strong IPR has an influence on companies to establish and keep their brand identity. Trademarks help games and companies to be seen in a busy market and assist buyers in trusting known brands. This distinction is critical to attract a stable group of customers.
• Piracy Prevention: IPR laws prevent piracy and unauthorized sharing of video games. These rights grant the companies the right to sue the violators of these rules, therefore reducing money lost from illegal copies and restoring gain to the real creators of such work.
• Facilitation of Collaboration and Licensing: IPR helps to collaborate and license the work among game developers, publishers, and anyone else. A company can license the intellectual property to reach new audiences, enhance their products, or expand to new markets; this will help the industry to grow and get innovative.

COMMON IPR ISSUES IN GAMING

Copyright Infringements

Copyright infringement is the act of using parts of game graphics, sound effects, or code without proper permission from the real owners. Infringement regards using game assets, visual elements, tracks, or code pieces without getting permission from the makers. The protection of game assets under the copyright law is what makes it an infringement if they are reproduced or shared without permission. This would also fall within the act of distributing copies of video games or even parts of those games infringing the exclusive rights of the copyright owner.

The case Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc. (1992)[4] is a landmark legal battle in the video game industry that covers copyright and patent infringement. Nintendo alleged that Atari had infringed its copyright by reverse-engineering the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) to create games, and further that it had also infringed its patents covering the lockout chip technology. The United States District Court granted an injunction that prevented Atari from continuing to sell games developed using the reverse-engineered technology and ordered Atari to pay Nintendo damages for infringement of copyrights and patents. In another case, Nazara Technologies Ltd. vs. HalaPlay Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2018), Nazara Technologies, a well-known mobile game developer and publisher across India, charged HalaPlay Technologies with intellectual property infringement by including elements in its game, such as gameplay mechanics, user interface, and overall presentation, that allegedly have been copied from “Nazara Cricket”. This matter was ultimately settled out of court. Under terms of the settlement, HalaPlay Technologies agreed to modify its game “HalaPlay” so that it would not be similar in nature to “Nazara Cricket.”

Trademark Disputes

Trademarks safeguard brand identifiers added to it, for example, game titles, logos, and explicit character names. Utilizing the same without permission can mislead consumers into believing an association with the trademark holder is considered as trademark infringement. When a game or a game-related product takes on a similar name, logo, or other branding elements that share a very great resemblance to those of an existing game, it becomes difficult for consumers to tell them apart. Not only does this threaten the brand reputation of the original game, but also opens up a series of legal threats by way of trademark violation.

The case of Moonshine Technology Private Limited vs. Tictok Skill Games Private Limited and Others (2022)[5] deals with trademark infringement and the balance of convenience in trademark law. Nazara Technologies Limited filed a suit against Tictok Skill Games Private Limited, contending that some of the trademarks used by Tictok were infringing on its registered trademarks. The Delhi Hight Court had granted an injunction in favour of the plaintiff, which restrained Tictok Skill Games from using the disputed trademarks based upon an analysis of the prima facie case of infringement and the balance of convenience and prospect of irreparable harm from an injunction.

Patent Trolls

When game developers or companies patent unique technologies, systems, and processes utilized in the development of the game such as new ways of rendering graphics, unique game mechanics, or even innovative display interface designs and any violator uses such patented technologies without permission, it is said to be an infringement of patent or patent trolls. Being a highly competitive industry, the gaming industry does not miss cases of patent disputes between game developers where the licensing and rights to some innovative features are in dispute.

The case of Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. Connectix Corporation (2000)[6], involved Sony filing a lawsuit against the Connectix Corporation over Connectix’s development of the PlayStation emulator, called Virtual Game Station, or VGS, for Macintosh computers. Sony charged that Connectix had infringed both on its patented PlayStation console and copyrighted software. According to Sony, Connectix reverse-engineered the PlayStation’s BIOS; this, it charged, was done illegally to create the VGS. The United States District Court had granted, on the preliminary injunction, an order sought by Sony that would have prevented VGS from selling its products. On appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the injunction was reversed. It held that Connectix had a fair use defence in reversing the PlayStation BIOS in engineering to make it compatible with PlayStation games.

Piracy Concerns

Piracy is illegal copying and distribution, most often assisted by a wide range of websites or platforms that host torrents, file-sharing networks, or even a lot of piracy through hard copies. Piracy encrypts not only the financial return accrued by game developers but also corrodes the integrity of the gaming experience. Pirates often prepare and circulate “cracked” forms of games that bypass computerized rights management DRM systems, letting clients play without buying genuine duplicates. This has brought about critical monetary misfortune to engineers and distributers.

In the case of Nintendo v. LoveROMs & LoveRETRO (2018)[7], Nintendo sued LoveROMs and LoveRETRO, who were offering its pirated copies for download, even of the games that make the iconic series of Mario, Zelda, and Pokémon series. Upon filing the said lawsuit, the owners of LoveROMs and LoveRETRO immediately closed their respective websites and deleted all the contents which belong to Nintendo on those websites. The court awarded Nintendo an amount of $12.23 million for damages, signifying how badly the distributors of copyrighted games shall be affected.

User-Generated Content (UGC)

UGC means that users of various games create and share mods, levels, or skins. Especially in the cases when such content becomes very famous or even monetized, the ownership may be an issue. Regarding that, it is not easy to establish the problem of ownership and control over UGC. For example, the problem can appear in a situation where a user creates such content that leads to an infringement of the IP rights of other persons, or if the game developer uses this kind of UGC without properly indicating the owner/author of the work or without compensating for its use.

McLeod v. Valve Corp. (2016)[8] is one of the more famous legal battles concerning the issue of gambling with virtual items within video games, particularly with “Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.” McLeod and other plaintiffs filed a class-action lawsuit against Valve Corp. alleging that Valve was facilitating and profiting from illegal gambling by allowing third-party websites to enable gambling with CS skins. Valve Corporation agreed to the following steps to deter gambling: sending cease and desist letters to various gambling websites, along with the discontinuation of gambling activities happening on its platforms.

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON IPR IN GAMING

The global landscape of Intellectual Property Rights in gaming is a complex and developing field. With increasing growth of the gaming industry, the level of IPR protections grew accordingly. Then came the most significant development with digital rights management—DRM technologies, which began to come into the scene in the late 1990s and early 2000s. DRM systems were developed to prevent the unauthorized copying and distribution of games, hence reducing piracy by great lengths. At the same time, there was a growing recognition pertaining to trademark protection, more so as gaming franchises became key brands. Developers began to take trademarks on the titles of the game, characters, and logos so that the creators of unique products were assured that their products would have a legal guard against imitation, and consumers could recognize original products.

The rise of online gaming and digital distribution channels like Steam, PlayStation Network, and Xbox Live introduced new challenges and opportunities for IPR in gaming. The said platforms provided a greater degree of control over game distribution and much more effective enforcement of IPR. On the downside, they also created problems in terms of unauthorized use of in-game assets and virtual goods. For these, the industry had to strengthen copyright protection on not only the games per se but also on their elements, such as graphics and music—even down to code. Licensing agreements proliferated as a means for developers to grant specific usage rights to third-party entities while generally retaining ownership of their intellectual property.

The last couple of years have seen breakthrough technologies intervene in Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, blockchain, and the state of affairs with regard to IPR in gaming. VR and AR expanded what is protectable content, while blockchain technology introduced new ways for managing and enforcing IP rights through smart contracts and decentralized ledgers. The international aspect has also enhanced cooperation between countries in the gaming industry on IPR matters by way of harmonizing their respective laws to better protect the rights of developers across borders.

This global view on the subject of IPR in gaming resonates with the idea: intellectual property should be protected to foster innovation, provide for fair competition, and ensure the sustainable growth of this sector. While there have been quite important developments with regard to the establishment of international frameworks relating to the protection of intellectual property rights, the majority of work needs to be done in terms of harmonization of laws, mechanism development for enforcement, and adaptation to new technological developments. In case the games industry continues growing further than it is at the moment, more deliberations between stakeholders of the likes of developers, publishers, and policymakers, as well as international institutions, will be very necessary in overcoming these challenges and further developing the scope of action on IPR globally for gaming.

FUTURE TRENDS IN IPR AND GAMING

i.  Improved Security of Game Elements:

• Protection of Character and Storyline: As narratives and characters in games are getting more complex and integral to the game, renewed and enhanced efforts will probably be taken toward the safety of Character and Storyline of games through copyright and trademark laws.
• Safeguarding Gameplay Mechanics: There may be new legal frameworks or more creative use of existing legal frameworks that will help safeguard unique gameplay mechanics, otherwise difficult to protect.

ii.  Rise of NFTs and Blockchain:

• Ownership and Earning: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) are changing the way digital items are owned and exchanged. In gaming, this might mean special in-game pieces that players can own and trade.
• Smart Contracts: Blockchain can enable smart contracts that enforce IP rights making sure creators get royalties from their work.

iii.  Esports and Streaming:

• Broadcasting Rights: With its exponential growth, an increasing amount of attention goes to related IP rights related to broadcasting tournaments or events.
• Content Creation: Streamers and makers of content need to become very conscious of the IP laws, most especially in regards to the use of in-game content and music in streams.

iv.  AI and Procedural Generation:

• AI Generated Content: The greater the use that is made by one game or another of AI as a method for generating content, the more the question will have to be asked of who holds the IP rights to such artificially intelligence-generated assets.
• Generative Procedures: Games generating algorithmic content will have to address how these auto-created elements of theirs are protected under IP law.

v.   Augmented and Virtual Reality—AR/VR:

• Content Protection: As AR and VR technologies are increasingly used in gaming, there will also be an increased measure of the need to protect the contents.
• User-Generated Content: This will present new learning curves in relation to the management and protection of IP rights as players create their own AR/VR game content.

vi.   Legal and Regulatory Developments:

• Global Harmonization: Attempts may be made toward global IP law harmonization, which would be sensitive to the cross-border nature of digital games.
• New Legislation: Governments can enact new legislation that gets at the distinctive areas of gaming IP, such as digital piracy and unauthorized use of game elements.

CONCLUSION

The phenomenal growth of the gaming industry and technological enhancement raise IPR to a significant factor in encouraging innovation and protecting creative works. IPR helps game developers and publishers to get economic rewards or gain competitive advantages by safeguarding game code, characters, storylines, music, and other components. This legal framework provides incentives for creativity and investment, ensures that unauthorized use is inhibited by piracy and infringement, and thus offers excellent preconditions for a healthy and sustainable games ecosystem.

Looking ahead, IPR in gaming will be plagued with new challenges and opportunities in terms of patenting emerging technologies. With the core focus on NFTs, blockchain, AI, and AR/VR, to this end, enhanced security measures for game elements and more global harmonization of IP laws are required. Innovative legal frameworks have to be built to sail through these complexities. Coupled with this, a strong and adaptive approach to IPR, as the gaming industry continues to grow, shall lie at the core of bringing into existence a world wherein creativity and innovation can be safe yet all the same time be open to motivation and encouragement, hence localizing a vivid future for the global gaming market.

REFERENCES

1. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=996bfdec-3735-42d8-8cc9-d7734fb55f37#:~:text=What%20is%20IP%20in%20the,copyrights%2C%20trademarks%2C%20and%20patents
2. https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/intellectual-property-rights-gaming-industry-copyright-trademark-patent-design-non-fungible-tokens-221253
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_protection_of_video_games
4. https://treelife.in/legal/types-of-intellectual-property-in-gaming/
5. https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2402289.pdf
6. https://www.foxmandal.in/online-gaming-challenges-in-protection-of-intellectual-property/
7. https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/digital-media/video-games/worldwide#:~:text=In%202024%2C%20the%20Video%20Games,US%24363.20bn%20by%202027.

---

[1] STATISTA, https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/digital-media/video-games/worldwide#:~:text=In%202024%2C%20the%20Video%20Games,US%24363.20bn%20by%202027 (last visited July 5, 2024).

[2] The Trade Marks Act, 1999, § 2(zb), No. 47, Acts of Parliament, 1999 (India).

[3] The Designs Act, 2000, § 2(d), No. 16, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[4] 975 F.2d 832 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

[5] CS (COMM) 331/2021

[6] 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000)

[7] No. 2:18-cv-00734 (D. Ariz. 2018)

[8] 149 F. Supp. 3d 1034 (W.D. Wash. 2016)

Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or the materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is of a personal nature.