This article is written by Anjali Tyagi of 3rd Year of Bcom. Llb of Banasthali Vidyapith University, Rajasthan
Abstract
Biological weapons are manufactured to cause harm to living organisms, including humans and animals. These weapons can be prepared in laboratories and can be used for various purposes, such as warfare, bioterrorism, environmental and for agricultural purposes also. The use of biological weapons is a threat to public health and safety as it has various consequences in the terms of morbidity and mortality rates. The Biological weapons can be used for political as well as economical gains. Various policies have been made by International environmental law which prohibits the development, production and use of biological weapons. This article includes the history of biological weapons and measures to control biological weapons.
Keywords: Biological weapons, International environmental law, Bioterrorism, Political and economical gains.
Introduction
Biological weapons are those that use biological agents to inflict harm on humans, animals, and plants. These agents can include viruses, bacteria, fungi, and toxins, which can cause fatal illnesses and even lead to mass death. Due to the potential danger posed by biological weapons, their development, production, stockpiling, transfer, and use have been prohibited by several international environmental laws. One such law and toxins that can be used to cause significant damage to the social, economic, and environmental fabric of societies. Due to the potential catastrophic consequences of their use, biological weapons have been prohibited by international environmental law under various agreements and treaties, including the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) of 1972. The BWC aims to prevent the development, production, and stockpiling of biological weapons, and it obligates member states to destroy existing weapons, as well as related facilities and equipment. In addition to this convention, other international environmental laws, such as the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, seek to break the nexus between terrorism and non-state actors and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), including bioweapons. However, despite these legal frameworks, there have been concerns raised about compliance, enforcement, and loopholes in these treaties. Additionally, recent developments in technology and the growth of biotechnology have created new challenges for the non-proliferation regime. The emergence of synthetic biology and gene-editing techniques, for example, could make it easier for state or non-state actors to develop novel biological agents with enhanced capabilities.
while international environmental law has made significant strides in regulating biological weapons and prohibiting their use, there remains a need for ongoing vigilance, compliance, and review of these policies as technology and geopolitical dynamics continue to evolve.
History of Biological warfare
During the Middle Ages, various forms of biological warfare were used, such as catapulting corpses and animal carcasses over the walls of enemy fortifications. In the 20th century, the development and use of biological weapons became more advanced and sophisticated. The first modern use of biological weapons took place during World War I when Germany and its allies used anthrax and glanders against allied forces. During World However, the use of modern biological weapons dates back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries when scientists discovered the existence of bacteria and viruses that could cause lethal diseases like anthrax, smallpox, and bubonic plague.
During World War I, Germany was the first country to use chemical weapons, but they also experimented with biological weapons, developing anthrax and glanders as potential agents of attack. In the interwar period, several countries, including Japan, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom, also researched and developed biological weapons.
During World War II, the Japanese army conducted extensive experiments on prisoners of war and civilians, using a variety of biological agents, including bubonic plague, anthrax, and cholera. The United States and the Allies also investigated biological warfare, but focused more on defensive measures.
After World War II, most countries agreed not to develop or use biological weapons, with the signing of the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972. However, some countries, including the Soviet Union and Iraq, continued to develop and stockpile biological weapons in secret.
Today, there is growing concern over the possibility of terrorist groups acquiring biological weapons or using bio agents as a weapon of choice, making the threat of biological warfare a serious global security issue.
What is Biological weapons Convention?
The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) is an international treaty that prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition, and use of biological weapons. The treaty was opened for signature in 1972 and entered into force in 1975. It currently has 183 states parties, making it one of the most widely adhered to disarmament agreements in the world. The main objective of the BWC was opened for signature in 1972 and has since been ratified or acceded by 183 countries. Its primary goal is to prevent the use of biological agents and toxins as weapons of war and other hostile purposes. The treaty also promotes international cooperation in the peaceful use of biological research and technology. The BWC is monitored by the States Parties, through a series of regular meetings and review conferences. It is also supported by a verification and monitoring mechanism, consisting of confidence-building measures and consultations. The BWC has been successful in preventing the use of biological weapons since its inception, although there have been some reported violations of the treaty by certain countries. The BWC has been supplemented by other international legal instruments, such as UN Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires all states to take measures to prevent non-state actors from acquiring weapons of mass destruction, including biological weapons. In recent years, there have been concerns about the potential use of biological agents in terrorist attacks, which has led to increased attention to the BWC’s provisions on prevention and preparedness.
Key provisions of the Biological Weapons Convention
Some key provisions of the Biological Weapons Convention include:
1. Prohibition on the development, production, stockpiling, and acquisition of biological weapons by states parties to the treaty.
2. The obligation for states parties to destroy all existing stockpiles of biological weapons and related materials.
3. The prohibition on the transfer of biological agents or toxins to non-state actors or other states that are not party any state party to the convention.
4. Destruction of all existing stockpiles of biological weapons and the facilities used to manufacture such weapons.
5. Compliance with the international norms and laws related to biological weapons, including the Geneva Protocol of 1925, that prohibits the use of biological and chemical weapons in war.
6. Restrictions on the transfer of biological agents or equipment that can be used to produce biological weapons to non-state actors or unauthorized parties.
7. Regularly sharing information on biological research and development through the exchange of scientific and technical information and visits by experts.
8. Assistance in the case of violations or suspected violations of the Convention, including investigation and enforcement measures.
9. Encouraging states that have not yet ratified the Convention to do so.
Overall, the Biological Weapons Convention aims to prevent the development, production, and use of biological weapons, and promote international peace and security through cooperation, transparency, and accountability.
Issues with Biological Weapons Convention
The Biological Weapons Convention faces several issues, including:
1. Lack of comprehensive verification: The Convention does not have any verification mechanism to ensure that the parties are complying with their obligations. There are no provisions for on-site inspections or investigations into suspected breaches of the treaty. This makes it difficult to detect and deter non-compliance, which undermines the credibility of the treaty.
2. Ambiguity in definitions are complying with their obligations. The Convention relies on self-reporting by member states.
3. Dual-use technology challenge: Advances in science and technology have made it easier to manipulate microorganisms for peaceful purposes, but they can also be used to produce biological weapons. This dual-use challenge makes it difficult to monitor and regulate technologies that can be used both for civilian and military purposes.
4. Non-state actor threat: The Convention was designed to prevent state parties from developing and using biological weapons. However, non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations, do not have any legal obligations under the Convention and could obtain and use biological weapons.
5. Lack of universality: The Convention has 183 parties; however, several states have not joined, including North Korea and Syria, which are suspected of having biological weapons programs.
6. Lack of clarity on offensive and defensive programs: The Convention prohibits the development, production, and stockpiling of biological weapons, but it allows member states to develop defensive measures. The distinction between defensive and offensive programs is not always clear, which raises concerns about the potential for misuse of such programs.
Policies by International environmental law
International environmental law prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, and use of biological weapons. The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) is a multilateral treaty that was ratified in 1972 and has since been signed by over 180 countries. The BWC seeks to prevent the development, production, and use of biological agents as weapons of war. The treaty prohibits the development, production, acquisition lateral treaty that entered into force in 1975 and has been ratified by over 180 countries. It aims to ban the use of biological agents and toxins as weapons, and to promote peaceful cooperation in the field of biotechnology. Under the BWC, signatory states are required to destroy all existing stocks of biological weapons and to take measures to prevent the proliferation of biological weapons. They are also required to consult with each other and exchange information on the prevention of bioterrorism. In addition to the BWC, other international environmental agreements that address biological weapons include the Geneva Protocol of 1925, which prohibits the use of chemical and biological weapons in war, and the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, which calls on all states to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including biological weapons.
Overall, international environmental law places a strong emphasis on the prohibition of biological weapons, and seeks to promote measures for their prevention and control in order to protect human health and the environment.
Measures to control Biological weapons
International treaties and agreements have been established to control and prohibit the production, stockpiling, and use of biological weapons. The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC) of 1972 is one such treaty, which aims to prohibit the development, production, stockpiling, and acquisition of biological agents and toxins for hostile purposes. In addition to these treaties, countries have also implemented domestic Convention (BTWC), signed in 1972, prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, and acquisition of biological agents and toxin weapons. The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, also known as the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), commits state parties to the complete elimination of biological weapons.
Measures to control biological weapons include:
Some of the measures are:
1. Strengthening International Agreements: Increasing adherence to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and other international agreements that prohibit the development, production, and use of biological weapons.
2. Development of a Verification and Inspection System: Developing a system to verify compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention and other agreements that would require inspections and monitoring of potential biological weapons facilities.
3. Enhancing Laboratory Safety: Enhancing laboratory safety regulations and practices will help prevent accidental or intentional release of biological agents.
4. Countering Biotechnology Advances: Developing measures to counter the advancement of biotechnology, including the misuse of this technology.
5. Encouraging National Legislation: Encouraging countries to adopt comprehensive national legislation to regulate biological materials, agents, and equipment that may be used in the development of biological weapons.
therefore, controlling biological weapons require close cooperation among governments, monitoring, verification, and inspection of potential biological weapons facilities, promoting laboratory safety, and legal measures to regulate the development, acquisition, and use of pathogens and biowarfare agents.
Conclusion
In conclusion, biological weapons remain a potent threat to human health and the environment. The international community has recognized this and made efforts to prevent their use by establishing policies and regulations under international environmental law. The Biological Weapons Convention was created to prohibit the development, production, and stockpiling of biological weapons. Furthermore, international environmental law also regulates the transport, handling, and disposal of biological agents to minimize enacting policies under international environmental law. The Biological Weapons Convention and subsequent protocols and agreements provide a strong legal framework for preventing the development, production, and use of biological weapons.
However, the challenges of implementing and enforcing these policies remain significant. The lack of transparency in certain countries’ biological programs and the potential for bioterrorism make it difficult to fully eliminate the threat of biological weapons. Additionally, advancements in biotechnology may create new bioweapon possibilities that must be addressed by international law.
Therefore, continued international cooperation and vigilance are critical to preventing the use of biological weapons and protecting human health and the environment. Robust monitoring and compliance mechanisms, as well as increased education and awareness about the dangers of biological weapons, can help ensure that these policies are effective in achieving their goals.
References
0 Comments