Case Laws
Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India (2005)
Citations: NOT AVAILABLE Date of Judgement: 2 February, 2005 Court: Supreme Court of India Case Type: Read more
Case Laws
Balfour vs. Balfour (1918-19) AIIER860 (CA)
Citation 2.K.B. 571 (Court of Appeal 1919) Date of Judgement 25th June 1919 Court Court of Appeal of England and Wales Case Type Maintenance Plaintiff Mrs. Balfour (Wife) Defendant Mr. Balfour (Husband) Bench Warrington LJ , Duke LJ , Atkin LJ BRIEF FACT SUMMARY A husband promised to pay his Read more
Case Laws
Singleton Abbey vs. Paludina
Citation [1926] UKHL J0708 – 1 Date of Judgement 8 July,1926 Court House of Lords Bench Viscount Dunedin, Lord Sumner, Lord Phillimore, Lord Carson, Lord Blanesburgh Plaintiff Singleton Abbey Defendant Sara BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE – In this case there occurred a collision on November 22, 1922, in the Read more
Case Laws
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain vs Boot Cash Chemist (Southern) LTD. (1952) 2AIIERRep.
Citation (1953) 1 QB 401, (1953) 1 ALL ER 492, (1953) 2 WLR 427 Date of Judgement 5 February 1953 Court Court of Appeal of England and Wales Petitioner Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain Respondent Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd. Bench Somervell LJ, Birket LJ and Romer LJ Referred Offer Read more
Case Laws
BHARATIYA KAMGAR KARMACHARI MAHASANGH VS. M/S. JET AIRWAYS LTD.
Citation (2023) 07 SC CK 0043 Date of Judgement 25th July, 2023 Court The Supreme Court Of India Case No Civil Appeal No. 4404 Of 2023 Case Type Civil Appeal Appellant Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh Respondent M/S. Jet Airways Ltd. Bench Abhay S. Oka, J ; Sanjay Karol, J Referred Industrial Disputes Read more
Case Laws
TOP 10 LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS ON THE DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE.
DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE: The basic explanation of doctrine of basic structure is to amend the new aspects or evolve the constitution of India to make necessary changes in that particular part of constitution. There is no such concept of “Doctrine of basic structure”, in the constitution of India, but Read more
Case Laws
Narendra Kumar and Others V The Union of India and Others 1960 AIR 430, 1960 SCR (2) 375
CITATION 1960 AIR 430, 1960 SCR (2) 375 DATE 03rd December, 1959. COURT Supreme Court of India. CASE TYPE Original Jurisdiction. CASE NO. Original Jurisdiction : Petition No. 85 of 1958 PETITIONER Narendra Kumar and Others. RESPONDENT The Union of India and Others. BENCH Sinha, Bhuvneshwar P.(Cj), Imam, Syed Jaffer, Kapur, Read more
Case Laws
Jagannath Patnaik v/s Sri Pitambar Bhupati Harichandan
Citation AIR 1954 Ori 241 Date of Judgement 26th February,1954 Court Orissa High Court Bench Justice Narsimhan,Justice Mohanty Plaintiff Jagannath Patnaik Defendant Sri Pitambar Bhupati Harichandan Mohapatra Relevant Section Section 40 of The Indian Contract Act,1872 BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Read more
Case Laws
Dr. Laxman Balakrishna Joshi Vs Trimbak Bapu Godbole and Anr. , AIR 1969 SCR (1) 206
Citation AIR 1969 SCR (1) 206 Date of Judgement 2 May 1968 Court Supreme Court Appellant Laxman Balakrishna Joshi Respondent Trimbak Bapu Godbole Bench Justice : J.M. Shelat, R.S. Bachawat and A.N. Grover Referred Tort- Negligence of Surgeon Facts of the Case On 6 May 1953, Ananda who is the Read more
![Child From Void/Voidable Marriage Cannot Be Treated as Coparcener by Birth in Hindu Joint Family: Supreme Court [Revanasiddappa and Anr. v. Mallikarjun and Ors.]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/image-removebg-preview-29-360x240.png)
LEGAL NEWS
Child From Void/Voidable Marriage Cannot Be Treated as Coparcener by Birth in Hindu Joint Family: Supreme Court [Revanasiddappa and Anr. v. Mallikarjun and Ors.]
The apex court ruled that children born out from void or voidable marriages (which is neither legitimate nor sanctioned by society) can claim the right in their parent’s ancestral property in joint Hindu family. The bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Read more
