PETITION NO. Arbitration Petition no. 4 DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED April 13, 2013 COURT In the High court of judicature at Bombay PETITIONER Sunit C. Khatau RESPONDENT Dilip Dharamsey Khatau CORAM R D Dhanuka,j. INTRODUCTION Arbitration Petition No. 4 of 1986 v/s Dilip Dharamsey Khatau, 2013 is a noteworthy legal Read more
Citation 1913 40 ALJ 489 Date of Judgement April 17, 1913 Case Type Based on the validity of the contract under the Indian Contract Act Case No Civ.Rev.NO 10 of 1913 Plaintiff Lalman Shukla Defendant Gauri Dutt Court Allahabad High Court Bench Justice Banerjee INTRODUCTION Contracts are an essential part Read more
Date of judgment 01 December 2011 Case no CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1502 OF 2005 Case type CRIMINALAPPELLATE JURISDICTION Petition/appellant State of Rajasthan Defendant/respondent Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta Bench THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Court THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Statue referred: Cases Read more
Citation- AIR 1961 SC 998 Date of Judgement- 25TH January, 1961 Court- Supreme Court of India Case type- Criminal Appeal No. 120 of Read more
DATE OF JUDGMENT 06 NOVEMBER, 1996 COURT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONER S.P. ANAND RESPONDENT H.D. DEVE GOWDA & OTHERS BENCH CJT, SUJATA V. MANOHAR REFERRED ARTICLE 32 CITATION AIR 1997 SC 272 Facts of the Case: The petitioner, S.P. Anand of Indore, filed a petition under Article 32 of Read more
Citation AIR 1997 SC 272 Date of Judgement 6th November, 1996 Case no. Civil Writ Petition no. 850 of 1996 Case type Writ petition Appellant S.P. Anand Respondent H.D. Gowde & Others Bench CJT, Sujata V. Manohar Court Supreme Court Of India A petition was submitted under Article 32 of Read more
Citation (2011) 4 SCC 36 Date of Judgment 1st March 2011 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Appeal (civil) 7796 of 1997 Petitioner GVK Industries Limited & Anr. Respondent Income Tax Officer & Anr. Petitioner’s Advocate GAGRAT AND CO Respondent’s Advocate SUSHMA SURI Bench S.H. KAPADIA,B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,K.S. PANICKER Read more
CASE NAME Chinnaya v. Ramayya CITATION ILR(1876-82)4 MAD 137 BENCH Innes J, Kindersley J COURT Madras High Court PLAINTIFF Chinnaya RESPONDENT Ramayya INTRODUCTION This case deals with the essential of a valid contract which is mentioned in section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says All agreements are Read more
Citation ILR (1876-82) 4 Mad 137 Judgment 21 October 1987 Court High Court of Madras Bench Innes J, Kindersley J Appellant Venkata Chinnaya Respondent Venkata RamayyaGaru Statute Section 2 & Section 10, Indian Contract Act 1872 Background: This case revolves around the concept of “Privity of Consideration”. This is a Read more
CITATION ILR (1876-82) 4 Mad 137 DATE OF JUDGMENT 21st October 1987 COURT Madras High Court APPELLANT Venkata Chinnaya RESPONDENT Venkata RammayaGaru BENCH Innes J, Kindersley J INTRODUCTION The case of Chinnaya vs. Ramayya is a seminal judgment rendered by the Madras High Court. It revolves around the intricate concept Read more
