Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

SC ALLOWS APPEAL IN 45-YEAR LONG  CASE: EXECUTING COURT’S ORDER RESTORED DUE TO HC  DISCREPANCIES

SC ALLOWS APPEAL IN 45-YEAR LONG  CASE: EXECUTING COURT'S ORDER RESTORED DUE TO HC  DISCREPANCIES
Article

SC ALLOWS APPEAL IN 45-YEAR LONG  CASE: EXECUTING COURT’S ORDER RESTORED DUE TO HC  DISCREPANCIES

Justice Vikram Nath granted leave to the appellant, the decree holder, to challenge the High Court of Rajasthan’s judgment. The revision filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order of the Executing Court dated 03.05.2007 rejecting objections under Section 47 CPC, has been allowed. Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsApril 26, 2024 ago

Visitor Count
3649787
Users Today : 12253
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle