Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

says the SUPREME COURT WHILE EXPLAINING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDONATION OF DELAY.

IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TAKE THE CASE’S MERITS INTO ACCOUNT WHILE JUSTIFYING A DELAY, says the SUPREME COURT WHILE EXPLAINING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDONATION OF DELAY.
Article

IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TAKE THE CASE’S MERITS INTO ACCOUNT WHILE JUSTIFYING A DELAY, says the SUPREME COURT WHILE EXPLAINING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDONATION OF DELAY.

For the Telugu Ganges Project, some land in the Andhra Pradesh village of Gandluru, District Guntur, was purchased sometime  in 1989. The sixteen plaintiffs preferred a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act because they were dissatisfied with the compensation provided under the award. Some of the claimants Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsApril 10, 2024 ago

Visitor Count
3867541
Users Today : 8578
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle