This article is written by Vandanaof 2nd year of LL. B at Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT From being looted and unethically ruled over by the East India Company and the British crown for almost 200 years to Becoming the largest democracy in the Read more
DATE OF JUDGMENT 06 NOVEMBER, 1996 COURT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONER S.P. ANAND RESPONDENT H.D. DEVE GOWDA & OTHERS BENCH CJT, SUJATA V. MANOHAR REFERRED ARTICLE 32 CITATION AIR 1997 SC 272 Facts of the Case: The petitioner, S.P. Anand of Indore, filed a petition under Article 32 of Read more
Citation AIR 1997 SC 272 Date of Judgement 6th November 1996 Court Supreme Court Subject Constitution and Elections Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff S.P. Anand Respondents/Defendant H.D. Gowda, Union of India, Dr. Shankar Dayal Sharma, Speaker of Lok Sabha, Leader of the Muslim League in Lok Sabha Bench Hon’ble Justice Sujata V. Manohar (CJT), Read more
Citation AIR 1997 SC 272 Date of Judgement 6th Nov, 1996 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Writ Petition case no – 850 of 1996 Appellant S. P. Anand Respondent H.D. Deve Gowda and Ors. Bench A.M. Ahmadi, C. J. and S.V. Manohar Sections Referred Constitution of India – Read more
Citation AIR 1997 SC 272 Date of Judgement 6th November, 1996 Case no. Civil Writ Petition no. 850 of 1996 Case type Writ petition Appellant S.P. Anand Respondent H.D. Gowde & Others Bench CJT, Sujata V. Manohar Court Supreme Court Of India A petition was submitted under Article 32 of Read more
Citation (2011) 4 SCC 36 Date of Judgment 1st March 2011 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Appeal (civil) 7796 of 1997 Petitioner GVK Industries Limited & Anr. Respondent Income Tax Officer & Anr. Petitioner’s Advocate GAGRAT AND CO Respondent’s Advocate SUSHMA SURI Bench S.H. KAPADIA,B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,K.S. PANICKER Read more
CASE NAME Chinnaya v. Ramayya CITATION ILR(1876-82)4 MAD 137 BENCH Innes J, Kindersley J COURT Madras High Court PLAINTIFF Chinnaya RESPONDENT Ramayya INTRODUCTION This case deals with the essential of a valid contract which is mentioned in section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says All agreements are Read more
Citation ILR (1876-82) 4 Mad 137 Judgment 21 October 1987 Court High Court of Madras Bench Innes J, Kindersley J Appellant Venkata Chinnaya Respondent Venkata RamayyaGaru Statute Section 2 & Section 10, Indian Contract Act 1872 Background: This case revolves around the concept of “Privity of Consideration”. This is a Read more
CITATION ILR (1876-82) 4 Mad 137 DATE OF JUDGMENT 21st October 1987 COURT Madras High Court APPELLANT Venkata Chinnaya RESPONDENT Venkata RammayaGaru BENCH Innes J, Kindersley J INTRODUCTION The case of Chinnaya vs. Ramayya is a seminal judgment rendered by the Madras High Court. It revolves around the intricate concept Read more
Citation Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 Date of Judgement 23 February 1854 Case Type English contract law case. Claimants Mr. Hadley and Another Respondent Baxendale and Others Court England and Wales High Court (Exchequer Court) Bench Parke B, Alderson B, Platt B and Martin B Read more
