On Tuesday, a number of Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to be heading towards dismissing UBS Group’s attempt of making the case more challenging for financial whistleblowers to establish claims of retaliation. Trevor Murray, a former UBS bond strategist, has appealed for his wrongful termination over refusing to produce false research findings Read more
INTRODUCTION The case Noor Saba Khatoon vs. Mohd. Quasim, 1997 answers the question arising before the court that whether the children of Muslim parents are entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for a period till they attain majority or till the time they can maintain themselves and Read more
CITATION 1970 AIR 1986 1970 SCR (3) 127 1969 SCC (3) 522 DATE OF JUDGMENT 28th October,1969 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Jagannath Agarwalla RESPONDENT Tata Air-Craft Ltd BENCH Hon’ble Justice VaidyialingamHon’ble Justice ShelatHon’ble Justice Dua INTRODUCTION Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills v. Tata Aircraft Ltd. Is a case, which Read more
CITATION AIR 1999 2 SCC 228 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 17.2.1999 COURT High Court of Delhi APPELLANT Githa Hariharan RESPONDENT Reserve bank of India BENCH Umesh C. Banerjee INTRODUCTION- The position of the mother as a natural guardian was upheld in Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India. In this case, Read more
CITATION (2001) 7 SCC 487 DATE OF JUDGMENT 31 August 2001 COURT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA APPELLANT S. NAGALINGAM RESPONDENT SIVAGAMI BENCH D.P. MOHAPATRA & K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. LAWS/ LEGISLATIONS APPLICABLE Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Indian Penal Code, 18602 INTRODUCTION In S Nagalingam v Sivagami, the respondent filed a criminal Read more
CITATION 1965 AIR 1082, 1965 SCR (1) 112. DATE OF JUDGEMENT 10/11/1964 COURT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA APPELLANT K. L. JOHAR AND COMPANY RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENCH WANCHOO, K.N. BENCH:WANCHOO, K.N.GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ)HIDAYATULLAH, M.DAYAL, RAGHUBARMUDHOLKAR, J.R. INTRODUCTION K.L Johar and Company. v/s Deputy Commercial Tax Officer 1964 is a remarkable Read more
CITATION (1906) AC 494 (PC) DATE OF JUDGEMENT 16 July 1906 COURT Supreme court of Transvaal APPELLANT TRIMBLE AND BENNETT RESPONDENT GOLDBERG BENCH The Earl of Halsbury, Lord Macnaghten, Sir Arthur Wilson, Sir Alfred Wills INTRODUCTION A noteworthy case heard by the US Supreme Court is Trimble v. Goldberg 1906. Read more
Citation 1957 SC 628 Date of Judgment 9.4.1957 Court The Supreme Court of India Case Type Civil Appeal No. 134 of 1956. Application R.M.D Chamarbaugwalla Respondent The Union Of India Bench T.L.V Aiyyar, Sudhi Ranjan Das, Bhuvneshwar P Sinha, S.K Das, P.B Ganjendragadkar Referred Prize Competition Act, Doctrine of severability. Read more
Case Name: MORO VISHVANATH V. GANESH VITHAL[i] Citation: (1873) 57 BOM. H.C. REPORTS 444 Cases referred: Sakho Narayan v. Narayan Bhikaji, [ii] [6 Bom. H.C. Rep A.C. J.238] Case History: This was a regular appeal from the decision of Chintaman S. Chitnis, First Class Subordinate Judge of Ratnagirh in Suit No. Read more
The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea that sought the recognition of Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Mosque site as Krishna Janam Bhoomi. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker and Justice Ashutosh Srivastava, passed this order after reserving its verdict on the matter last month. A Read more
