CITATION 1993CRILJ248, (1992)2GLR882 DATE 14 February, 1992 COURT NAME(COUNTRY) Gujarat High Court DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Keshavlal Maganbhai Jogani PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER The State Of Gujarat JUDGES M.S. Parikh, J INTRODUCTION The case involves the incident that took place on 13th October 1982, wherein Mr Naginbhai Nathubhai Patel, an inspector under the Bombay Money Lenders Read more…
CITATION 1971 AIR 885, (1971) 1 SCJ 43, 1971 MADLJ(CRI) 33, 1971 MAH LJ 792, 1971 SCD 81 YEAR OF JUDGEMENT 1970 PETITIONER Noor Mohammad Mohd. Yusuf Momin RESPONDENT State of Maharashtra STATUTES REFFERD IN THIS CASE INDIAN PENEL CODE BENCH Hon’ble Justice I.D. Dua, Justice M. Hidayatullah, Justice A.N. Ray INTRODUCTIONS The Read more…
This article is written by Nilabh Gupta, of United University, an intern Under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT Modern medicine underwent a shift with genetic testing since it provides a complete understanding of genetic composition, thus allowing better disease detection alongside customized treatments and advanced preventive methods. Genetic testing provides medical benefits Read more…
CITATION [2015] 14 S.C.R. 613 YEAR OF JUDGEMENT 2015 PETITIONER UNION OF INDIA RESPONDENT V. SRIHARAN @ MURUGAN & ORS. STATUTES REFFERD IN THIS CASE CrPC( 1973), IPC (1860) ,C.O.I BENCH HON’BLE JUSTICE . FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA INTRODUCTIONS The Supreme Court of India witnessing a notable shift in the Read more…
CITATION 160 Delhi Law Times 277 Legal services DATE OF JUDGMENT 02-July-2009 PLAINTIFF Naz Foundation RESPONDENT Government of Delhi & Ors STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE Code of Criminal Procedure BENCH Chief Justice Ajit , Prakash Shah(j) , S.Murlidhar INTRODUCTION Naz Foundation vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi is a Read more…
CITATION 1970 CriLj 286 YEAR OF JUDGEMENT 23 FEBRUARY , 1967 APPELLANT RAMDHARA RESPONDENT PHULWATIBAI STATUTES REFFERD IN THIS CASE INDIAN PENEL CODE BENCH HON’BLE JUSTICE . SHIV DAYAL SRIVASTAVA INTRODUCTIONS The case of Ramdhara v. Phulwatibai (AIR 1997 MP 15) is an important decision regarding an issue of Read more…
This article is written by Srijal Pathak of United University an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT This article will be critically analyzing The Rule Against Perpetuity under Section 14 of the Transfer of Property Act, by examining its application and evolution through various judicial pronouncements through landmark cases and also Read more…
CITATION AIR 1957 SC 620 DATE April 5th, 1957 COURT NAME The Supreme Court Of India PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER Ramji Lal Modi DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. State of Uttar Pradesh JUDGES Chief Justice Sudhi Ranjan Das, Justice Syed Jafer Imam, Justice Sudhanshu Kumar Das, and Justice P. Govinda Menon and Justice A.K. Sarkar. INTRODUCTION The Read more…
CITATION Arjun Ganpat Sandbhor vs. State of Maharashtra Criminal Appeal No. 49 of 2001 DATE Decided on May 3, 2012 COURT NAME Bombay High Court PETITIONER Arjun Ganpat Sandbhor RESPONDENT State of Maharashtra JUDGES Hon’ble Mr Justice B.R. Gavai Introduction The case of Arjun Ganpat Sandbhor vs. State of Maharashtra Read more…
CITATION AIRONLINE 1993 SC 535 DATE 14TH JANUARY 1993 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF / PETITIONER CHANDRAKALA DEFENDANT / RESPONDENT VIPIN MENON JUDGES KULDIP SINGH B.P. JEEVAN REDDY INTRODUCTION The legal matter of Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon is significant in terms of matrimonial law and family disputes in Read more…