CITATION 1964 AIR 986; 1964 SCR (5) 916 DATE 11th DECEMBER, 1963 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER Smt. MATHRI & Ors. (APPELLANT) DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. STATE OF PUNJAB (RESPONDENT) JUDGES JUSTICE K. C. DAS GUPTAJUSTICE P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR INTRODUCTION In the case of Mathri and Others v. State of Punjab, Read more…
This Article is written by Himanshi Singh, of United University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT The development of space habitats depends on space law through its creation of sustainable structures with security protocols while fostering international joint operations to establish human settlements outside Earth. The Outer Space Treaty, alongside Read more…
CITATION 1961 AIR 751, 1961 SCR (2) 679, AIR 1961 SUPREME COURT 751, 1961 2 SCR 679 ILR 1961 1 ALL 509, ILR 1961 1 ALL 509 DATE 25 November, 1960 COURT NAME(COUNTRY) Supreme Court of India DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT BABU RAM UPADHYA PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS JUDGES Read more…
CITATION 1985 AIR 945, 1985 SCR (3) 844 DATE 23rd April 1985 COURT NAME The Supreme Court of India PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER Mohd. Ahmed Khan DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. Shah Bano Begum and Ors. JUDGES YV Chandrachud (CJ) Justice Misra Rangnath Justice D.A Desai Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy Justice E.S Venkataramiah INTRODUCTION The case Mohd. Ahmed Read more…
This Article is written by Nilabh Gupta, of United University, an intern Under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT Nursing home patients receive strong protection through healthcare law, which sets rules to improve their care quality and preserve their dignity. The NHRA and HIPAA regulations define essential rules for safe patient care, including Read more…
Citation 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 968 Date June 12, 2019 Court Name High Court of Bombay plaintiff/appellant/petitioner State of Maharashtra defendant/respondent. Ankur Narayanlal Panwar Judges Justice Prakash D. Naik Facts Of the Case Issues of The Case Judgement: Following an analysis of the case’s facts and circumstances, the court issued Read more…
CITATION 1986 AIR 180, 1985 SCR SUPL. (2) 51, AIR 1986 SUPREME COURT 180, 1986 CRILR(SC&MP) 23, 1985 (3) SCC 545, (1985) 2 BOM CR 434 DATE 10 July, 1985 Y.V. Chandrachud (CJ), Syed Murtaza Fazalali, V.D. Tulzapurkar, O. Chinnappa Reddy (J), A. Varadarajan (J) Supreme Court of India DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Read more…
ABOUT THE CANONSPHERE Canonsphere is an innovative platform focused on the growth and development of legal professionals. Through dynamic events, we provide law students and professionals with opportunities to engage in activities such as debates, moot courts, blog writing, and quizzes. We collaborate with other organizations in the same niche Read more…
ABOUT CANONSPHERE Canonsphere is an innovative platform that focuses on the growth and development of individuals in the legal field. Through engaging events, we provide law students with opportunities to participate in debates, moot courts, blog or article writing, drafting competitions, quizzes, and much more in collaboration with organizations having Read more…
This article is written by Shubhi Mishra of United University, Prayagraj, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT The article being abstracted emphasises the relevance of space law because of the promotion of co-operation for space science when mankind goes into outer space. The paper discusses the way international space law Read more…