No further latitude need be shown to the respondent who was part of a disciplined force and has been found guilty of assaulting his colleague. Consequently, we find no good reason to interfere with the punishment awarded to the respondent: Supreme Court

 No further latitude need be shown to the respondent who was part of a disciplined force and has been found guilty of assaulting his colleague. Consequently, we find no good reason to interfere with the punishment awarded to the respondent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on 8th May,2024 ,Wednesday had given its judgment on the 2020 compulsory retirement case of a head constable who was working in the CRPF.  In this case a head constable who was working in the Central Reserve Police Force ( CRPF) was charged with an allegation of Read more

Supreme Court said in the judgment of judicial service: ‘The impugned selection process in the state of Bihar and Gujarat are found to be legally valid and are upheld.’

Supreme Court said in the judgment of judicial service: ‘The impugned selection process in the state of Bihar and Gujarat are found to be legally valid and are upheld.’

The Supreme court on Monday dated May 6, 2024 in its judgment for the 2015  judicial service case upheld the validity of the selection process in the Gujarat and state judicial services .While saying more about the judgment. The bench led by justice Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant kumar Mishra had Read more

The provision of Section 14(3) of the Act, providing for the period of three months for completion of a preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Act, is not mandatory : Supreme Court on the Karnataka juvenile Case

The provision of Section 14(3) of the Act, providing for the period of three months for completion of a preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Act, is not mandatory : Supreme Court on the Karnataka juvenile Case

The Supreme court on Tuesday gave its verdict on the case of Child for conflict to his mother vs State of Karnataka and others.  In the case the Supreme court had mainly focused on the provision of section 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and had also mentioned several Read more

Play sound