The central government has informed the Supreme Court that the execution of projects relating to feminine cleanliness or menstrual hygiene falls inside the domain of states, putting accentuation on the way that general wellbeing is a state concern.

The central government has informed the Supreme Court that the execution of projects relating to feminine cleanliness or menstrual hygiene falls inside the domain of states, putting accentuation on the way that general wellbeing is a state concern.

“Public health is a state subject, and the responsibility of furnishing healthcare services is that ofseparate state governments.”The Central government and its agencies aren’t the enforcing bodies for schemes relating tomenstrual health, and it’s in fact the countries and their agencies that are at the forefront ofenforcement of those programmes, Read more

Supreme Court held: If a proposal made by the defense attorney to a witness during cross-examination is found to be incriminating, the accused would be bound by it and would be unable to flee: in light of BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Supreme Court held: If a proposal made by the defense attorney to a witness during cross-examination is found to be incriminating, the accused would be bound by it and would be unable to flee: in light of BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

In a recent Reportable Judgement (BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[1]), the Supreme Court observed that suggestions made by the defence attorney to a witness during cross-examination, if found to be incriminating in nature, would unquestionably bind the accused and that the accused cannot escape on the Read more

Play sound