Legal Vidhiya

The petitioner who asked the Supreme Court to direct the Bombay High Court to resolve a case within a specific time frame has been charged a penalty of ₹1.5 lakh by the Supreme Court.

The petitioner who asked the Supreme Court to direct the Bombay High Court to resolve a case within a specific time frame has been charged a penalty of ₹1.5 lakh by the Supreme Court.

Keywords: article 32, Bombay high court, penalty A builder was fined ₹1, 50,000 by the Supreme Court for submitting a petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, asking for a writ of mandamus to the Bombay High Court to resolve a 2019 appeal within a designated timeframe. The builder’s Read more

By Admin, ago

Narinderjit Singh Sahni and anr. vs. Union of India and ors

  Narinderjit Singh Sahni and anr. vs. Union of India and ors AIR 2001 SC 3810                                                          Dealt with the constitutional validity of provisions in the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. ABSTRACT Narinderjit Singh Sahni and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. is a case decided by the Read more

By Admin, ago

Epiq, Hyderabad, is inviting applications for the post of Legal Associates

About Epiq Epiq, a global technology-enabled services leader for the legal industry and corporations takes on large-scale, increasingly complex tasks for corporate counsel, law firms, and business professionals with efficiency, clarity, and confidence. Responsibilities Review documents for relevancy, privilege, and other issues as directed by clients.Assist with research on technical Read more

By Admin, ago
Play sound