Legal Vidhiya

DELHI HIGH COURT: When a foreign national’s movement has been restricted, such a foreign national cannot claim that they have a right to reside and settle in India granted by the Indian Constitution as they are subject to restrictions

DELHI HIGH COURT: When a foreign national’s movement has been restricted, such a foreign national cannot claim that they have a right to reside and settle in India granted by the Indian Constitution as they are subject to restrictions

In this case, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court rejected the habeas corpus petition filed by the petitioner and held that the detention of a Bangladeshi national, Mr. Azal Chakma, is not illegal, as his movement was restricted so that he remained available for deportation, and that such a foreign citizen Read more

By Admin, ago
SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY OF POSH & UNDERSTANDING THE WORKPLACES COVERED UNDER THE ACT WITH CASES

SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY OF POSH & UNDERSTANDING THE WORKPLACES COVERED UNDER THE ACT WITH CASES

This article is written by Annu Kumari of 8th Semester of Lovely Professional University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT This article deals with the comprehensive scope and applicability of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) Act, enacted in 2013, to create secure working environments for employees. Examining a wide Read more

By Admin, ago
AGREEMENTS IN THE RESTRAINT OF TRADE; AGREEMENTS IN THE RESTRAINT OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS; AMBIGUOUS AND UNCERTAIN AGREEMENTS; THE WAGERING AGREEMENTS

AGREEMENTS IN THE RESTRAINT OF TRADE; AGREEMENTS IN THE RESTRAINT OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS; AMBIGUOUS AND UNCERTAIN AGREEMENTS; THE WAGERING AGREEMENTS

This article is written by Ritika Srivastava of Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT Among the most crucial elements of what we do every day are agreements. Every day, we sign many agreements. Either knowingly or unconsciously, these agreements are made. Agreements grant the parties a Read more

By Admin, ago
HOCHSTER V DE LA TOUR

HOCHSTER V DE LA TOUR

CITATION [1853] EWHC J72 (QB), (1853) 2 E&B 678, [1843-1860] All ER Rep 12 DATE OF JUDGMENT 25th JUNE 1853 COURT COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH APPELLANT ALBERT HOCHSTER RESPONDENT EDGAR DE LA TOUR JUDGE LORD CAMPBELL CJ INTRODUCTION In this landmark English contract law case, Mr. Hochster sued Mr. De Read more

By Admin, ago
Play sound