State of Punjab vs. Naib Din AIR 2001 SC 3955 DATE OF THE CASE: 28/09/2001 APPELLANT: STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT: NAIB DIN BENCH/JUDGES: K.T. Thomas & S.N. Variava LEGAL PROVISIONS: Section 9 of the Opium Act, Section 313 Cr. P. C, Section 296 Cr. P. C, Section 313 Cr. P. Read more
Rama Rao & Anr. Vs. Narayan & Anr. Case Name : Rama Rao & Anr. Vs. Narayan and Anr. Equivalent Citation : (1969)1 SCC 167; AIR 1969 SC 724 Date of Judgement : 20 December 1968 Court : Supreme Court of India Case No. : Criminal Appeal no. 51 of Read more
CASE NAME: HARIHAR CHAITANYA VS STATE OF U. P. EQUIVALENT CITATION: 1990 CriLJ 2082 COURT: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD JUDGE: MR. JUSTICE R.K. SAKSENA DATE OF JUDGMENT 2 November, 1989 PETITIONER HARIHAR CHAITANYA RESPONDENT STATE OF U. P. ISSUE: WHETHER THE MAGISTRATE HAD THE JURISDICTION TO PASS AN Read more
Facts of the Case A common question of law has been urged before us in all these three habeas corpus petitions and hence it would be better to dispose of all these petitions through a common order. HCP No. 1676 of 1994 is capable of being disposed of on factual Read more
Case Name : S Rama Krishna Vs. S. Rami Reddy Equivalent Citation: AIR 2008 SC 2066 Date Of Judgement : 29/04/2008 Court : Supreme Court Of India Case No. : Appeal {crl.} 755 of 2008 Case Type : Appeal {criminal} Petitioner : S Rama Krishna Respondent : S. Rami Reddy {D} Read more
Case name : Jakia Nasim Ahesan & Anr. Vs State Of Gujarat Equivalent citations : 2012 SC 243 Date of judgement : 12th September 2011 Case no. : Criminal appeal no.1765 Read more
KISHORE KUMAR GYANCHANDANI V. G.D. MEHROTRA Appellant Kishore Kumar Gyanchandani Respondent G.D. Mehrotra Date of Judgement 28th February 2001 Court Supreme Court of India Citation AIR 2002 SC 483 Bench G. Pattanaik, S.Phukar, B. Agarwal FACTS OF THE CASE:- ISSUE OF THE CASE:- Can a complaint file any complain after Read more
BACKGROUND FACTS: This very arises out of a complaint against the accused, where a case under section 406 and 420 was registered against petitioners. Petitioner 1 is the managing director of premier footwear Pvt Ltd. the petitioner is the son in law of the first petitioner, 3rd petitioner is the Read more
Anil Kumar vs. The State of Maharashtra 1990 Cri LJ 2058 FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioner, Anil Kumar, an advocate working in Akot, Akola District, was apprehended by the Akot Police on 11-9-1989. He was accused of possessing 15 packets of 750 mg each consisting of Heroin (diacetylmorphine) mis-representing Read more
This article is written by Soumya Shekhar, Som Law College Prayagraj, UP, 4th Semester (LL. B), intern under Legal Vidhiya Introduction The Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India. It is a bicameral legislature composed of the president of India and two houses: the Read more