The Supreme Court has questioned whether the MTP Act permits abortions beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy in cases of fetal abnormality, but not in cases of minor rape or incest.

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the MTP Act permits abortions beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy in cases of fetal abnormality, but not in cases of minor rape or incest.

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court expressed concerns about the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act’s ban on ending a pregnancy for minors who have experienced rape or incest before 24 weeks, but allowed for the termination of such pregnancies in the event of notable foetal abnormalities. According to the Read more

Elected Members Of Municipality Can't Be Removed At Whims And Fancies Of Civil Servants Or Their Political Masters : Supreme Court. 

Elected Members Of Municipality Can’t Be Removed At Whims And Fancies Of Civil Servants Or Their Political Masters : Supreme Court. 

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India delivered a resounding affirmation of the autonomy and democratic integrity of elected municipal members, ruling that they cannot be removed at the whims and fancies of civil servants or their political masters. The ruling, delivered in response to a case challenging Read more

Supreme Court said in the judgment of judicial service: ‘The impugned selection process in the state of Bihar and Gujarat are found to be legally valid and are upheld.’

Supreme Court said in the judgment of judicial service: ‘The impugned selection process in the state of Bihar and Gujarat are found to be legally valid and are upheld.’

The Supreme court on Monday dated May 6, 2024 in its judgment for the 2015  judicial service case upheld the validity of the selection process in the Gujarat and state judicial services .While saying more about the judgment. The bench led by justice Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant kumar Mishra had Read more

The provision of Section 14(3) of the Act, providing for the period of three months for completion of a preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Act, is not mandatory : Supreme Court on the Karnataka juvenile Case

The provision of Section 14(3) of the Act, providing for the period of three months for completion of a preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Act, is not mandatory : Supreme Court on the Karnataka juvenile Case

The Supreme court on Tuesday gave its verdict on the case of Child for conflict to his mother vs State of Karnataka and others.  In the case the Supreme court had mainly focused on the provision of section 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and had also mentioned several Read more

Play sound