Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
      • Bail
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

KARNATKA HIGH COURT QUASHES SECTION  498A IPC CASE FILED AGAINST HUSBAND FOR NOT CONSUMMATING MARRIAGE.

KARNATKA HIGH COURT QUASHES SECTION  498A IPC CASE FILED AGAINST HUSBAND FOR NOT CONSUMMATING MARRIAGE.
LEGAL NEWS

KARNATKA HIGH COURT QUASHES SECTION  498A IPC CASE FILED AGAINST HUSBAND FOR NOT CONSUMMATING MARRIAGE.

 In [AIYAPPA MB V. STATE OF KARNATKA] A couple tied a knot in 2020  ,but they didn’t have any physical relationship or sexual activity because he was a follower of  BRAHMAKUMARI . he used to watch their videos After that the wife (petitioner) had moved the court for seeking divorce Read more…

By Admin, 2 yearsJune 20, 2023 ago

Visitor Count
2203965
Users Today : 262
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

  • 4 – Week Certificate Course on PoSH
  • About
  • Advisory Board
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact Us
  • Contents
  • Core Team
  • Disclaimer Policy
  • Executive Committee
  • Founders
  • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • Internship
  • Legal News Interns
  • Legal Vidhiya
  • Legal Vidhiya : A Place Where Journey Begins
  • Legal Vidhiya Upcoming Events
  • My Calendar
  • OpportunityAdda
  • Our Team
  • Prime Jurist
  • Privacy Policy
  • Research Interns
  • Section 1 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Terms of Use
  • The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Virtual Internship Opportunity at Legal Vidhiya: Apply by June 28
  • Youtube
Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle