Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
      • Bail
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TAKE THE CASE’S MERITS INTO ACCOUNT WHILE JUSTIFYING A DELAY

IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TAKE THE CASE’S MERITS INTO ACCOUNT WHILE JUSTIFYING A DELAY, says the SUPREME COURT WHILE EXPLAINING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDONATION OF DELAY.
Article

IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TAKE THE CASE’S MERITS INTO ACCOUNT WHILE JUSTIFYING A DELAY, says the SUPREME COURT WHILE EXPLAINING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDONATION OF DELAY.

For the Telugu Ganges Project, some land in the Andhra Pradesh village of Gandluru, District Guntur, was purchased sometime  in 1989. The sixteen plaintiffs preferred a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act because they were dissatisfied with the compensation provided under the award. Some of the claimants Read more…

By Admin, 1 yearApril 10, 2024 ago

Visitor Count
2243847
Users Today : 1759
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

  • 4 – Week Certificate Course on PoSH
  • About
  • Advisory Board
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact Us
  • Contents
  • Core Team
  • Disclaimer Policy
  • Executive Committee
  • Founders
  • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • Internship
  • Legal News Interns
  • Legal Vidhiya
  • Legal Vidhiya : A Place Where Journey Begins
  • Legal Vidhiya Upcoming Events
  • My Calendar
  • OpportunityAdda
  • Our Team
  • Prime Jurist
  • Privacy Policy
  • Research Interns
  • Section 1 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Terms of Use
  • The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Virtual Internship Opportunity at Legal Vidhiya: Apply by June 28
  • Youtube
Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle