Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

CASELAWS

Case Laws

Central London Property Trust v/s High Trees House Ltd (1947) 

Citation  (1947) KB 130;(1956) 1 AII ER 256; 62 TLR 557, LJR 77; 175LT 333 Date of Judgement 18 July, 1946 Court King’s Bench Division  Case Type Promissory Estoppel Appellant  Central London Property Trust Ltd Respondent  High Trees House Ltd Bench  Mr. Denning J Referred  English Contract Law Facts of Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
HADLEY vs. BAXENDALE (1854) EWHC J70
Case Laws

HADLEY vs. BAXENDALE (1854) EWHC J70

HADLEY vs. BAXENDALE has been widely celebrated as a landmark in the law of contracts, and more widely as a triumph of the common law system. Citation (1854) EWHC J70 Date of Judgement 23 FEB 1854 Court England and Wales High Court (Exchequer Court) Case Type English Contract Law Plaintiff Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
Vikas Kumar V. Union Public Service Commission &  Others 
2021-2022 Supreme Court

Vikas Kumar V. Union Public Service Commission &  Others 

Citation  [2011] 11 S.C.R. 281 Date of Judgment  11 February 2021 Court  Supreme Court Case Type  Civil Case Appellant  Vikas Kumar. Respondent  Union Public Service Commission & others Bench  Justice Dr. Dhananjay Chandrachud,  Justice Indira Banerjee, Justice Sanjiv  Khanna FACTS OF THE CASE  The appellant, Vikash Kumar, a civil services Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI V. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2023-2024 Supreme Court

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI   V.  UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 

Citation(s) 2023 INSC 517 Date of Judgement 11 May, 2023 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Civil Appeal No 2357 of 2017 Appellant Government of NCT of Delhi Respondent Union of India Bench Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJ., MR Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J., Hima Kohli, J., P.S. Narasimha, Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
Tower Cabinet Co., Ltd v. Ingram (1949) 1 KBD 1032
Case Laws

Tower Cabinet Co., Ltd v. Ingram (1949) 1 KBD 1032

CITATION (1949) 1 KBD 1032 DATE OF JUDGMENT 1st November, 1949 COURT High Court of Justice in England APPELLANT Tower Cabinet Co., Ltd. RESPONDENT Mr. Ingram BENCH                         Lynskey J.  INTRODUCTION Tower Cabinet Co., Ltd v. Ingram (1949) 1 KBD 1032 is a case in English partnership law that deals with Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
Natesa Aiyar And Ors. vs Appavu Padayachi on 21 September, 1908
Case Laws

Natesa Aiyar And Ors. vs Appavu Padayachi on 21 September, 1908

CITATION (1910)20MLJ230 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 21.09.1908 APPELLANT Natesa Aiyar and Ors. RESPONDENT Appavu Padayachi BENCH John Edward Power Wallis and Chettur Sankaran Nair, JJ. COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Referred Laws  Sections 55, 64, 73,74  INTRODUCTION:  In this instance, the plaintiff sued the defendant, seeking the return of Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Brown vs. Kendall, (1850) 6 Cush.

CITATION 60 Mass. 292, 1850 WL 4572 (Mass.) DATE OF JUDGEMENT October Term1850 APPELLANT Brown RESPONDENT Kendall BENCH Wells, C. J., in the court of common pleas COURT The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts INTRODUCTION:  60 Mass. 292, 1850 WL 4572 (Mass.), 6 Cush. 292, is a trespass action for Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
British Paints (India) Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1971 CAL. 393
Case Laws

British Paints (India) Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1971 CAL. 393

CITATION AIR 1971 Cal 393 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 3 December, 1970 COURT Calcutta High Court  APPELLANT British Paints (India) Ltd. RESPONDENT Union of India (UOI)  BENCH S Chakravarti, S Sarkar INTRODUCTION:  This case is a dispute between the plaintiff and the Union of India over a paint supply contract. The Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
Case Laws

RHODES V. MOULES (1895) 1 CH. 236 (CA)

CITATION (1895) 1 CH. 236 (CA) DATE OF JUDGEMENT 1895  APPELLANT RHODES RESPONDENT MOULES BENCH LORD HERSCHELL L.C. INTRODUCTION:  A notable legal case, Rhodes v. Moules (1895) 1 Ch. 236 (CA), centers on difficult questions of partnership responsibility, the range of a solicitor’s jurisdiction, agency, and identifying the beneficiary in a Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago
BABUI PANMATO KUER V/S RAM AGYA SINGH, AIR 1968 PAT. 190
Case Laws

BABUI PANMATO KUER V/S RAM AGYA SINGH, AIR 1968 PAT. 190

CITATION 1967 Indlaw PAT 51, AIR1968 PAT 190 DATE OF JUDGMENT 18TH February, 1967 COURT High Court of Patna APPELLANT Babui Panmato Kuer  RESPONDENT Ram Agya Singh BENCH G.N. Prasad INTRODUCTION The Court while reiterating illustration (b) to Section 17 of the Contract Act, which defines fraud, observed that the Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsNovember 14, 2023 ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 79 80 81 … 159 Next

Visitor Count
4060727
Users Today : 5330
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle