Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

CASELAWS

Case Laws

ATUL BABRUVAN KAMBLE V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

FACTS OF THE CASE The application of bail had been filed under 439[1] of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 by the respondents in front of the High Court as the accused arrested was not guilty of any crime. The incident was registered by the police officers of APMC Police Station, Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

CHACKO AND ORS. V. MAHADEVAN

CASE NAME: CHACKO AND ORS. V. MAHADEVAN LEGAL MAXIM: INTODUCTION: In this case the contract is declared void because one or both parties were mentally incapable of entering into a contract. The name of the case is Chakho & Ors v. Mahadevan.[1] Due to Alcoholic psychosis brought on by alcohol Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 158 159

Visitor Count
3438327
Users Today : 9378
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle