Mr. Prakash Vernekar S/O Shri vs State Of Goa, 14 June 2007 Equivalent citations: 2007 CriLJ 4649 Bench: N Britto The Additional Sessions Judge in Panaji issued an order on October 27, 2006, which is being challenged in this revision petition. The order relates to a criminal case (no. 205/1996/C) Read more
FACTS: a) 3(1)(ix)-Atrocities Act b) 3(2)(vi)- Atrocities Act c) 3(2)(vii)- Atrocities Act d) Section 182- IPC e) Section 192- IPC f) Section 193- IPC g) Section 203- IPC h) Section 219 read with section 34- IPC 5. The High Court rejected the appellant’s request to have the aforementioned complaint Read more
FACTS OF THE CASE ISSUE RAISED CONTENTION BY APPELLANT : CONTENTIONS BY RESPONDENT: JUDGEMENT In order to appreciate rival submissions section 156 of the code of criminal procedure needs to be quoted The court held that it is clear to understand, that any Judicial Magistrate, before taking cognizance of any Read more
Citation: AIR 1978 Guj 49 Bench: J. D Desai, J. P Desai, J. B Mehta Decided by: Gujarat High Court Date of Judgement: 15 April, 1977 Introduction: The instant case holds an important place in the legal domain in giving a ruling that reading over of the police statement to Read more
FACTS OF THE CASE The application of bail had been filed under 439[1] of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 by the respondents in front of the High Court as the accused arrested was not guilty of any crime. The incident was registered by the police officers of APMC Police Station, Read more
CASE NAME: CHACKO AND ORS. V. MAHADEVAN LEGAL MAXIM: INTODUCTION: In this case the contract is declared void because one or both parties were mentally incapable of entering into a contract. The name of the case is Chakho & Ors v. Mahadevan.[1] Due to Alcoholic psychosis brought on by alcohol Read more