Case Name: Sajid Basir Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Equivalent Citation: 2005 (3) Mh Lj 860 Date of Judgement: 06 July 2005 Court: High Court of Bombay Case No.: Cri. Appln. No. 3157 of 2005 Case Type: Criminal Application Petitioner: Sajid Basir Shaikh Respondent: State of Maharashtra Bench: Read more…
COURT: The Honourable Supreme Court of India. CITATION: Civil Appeal No. 1769 of 2021 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 7th May 2021 JUDGES: Honourable Chief Justice of India Shri. N.V. Ramana, Honourable Justice Surya Kant, Honourable Justice Aniruddha Bose. PARTIES: (Appellant) Rahul Sharma & Anr. (Respondents) National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. Read more…
Introduction: Jayendragiri Anandgiri Goswami Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and Anr[1]. is a significant case that deals with the constitutional validity of Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, of 1985[2]. This case was heard and decided by a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court, consisting of Read more…
In Bombay high court of India. NAME OF THE CASE Abdul Wahid vs State of Maharashtra (1991),93 BOMLR 478 EQILIANT CITATION 1992 CriLj 1900 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 27/08/1991 COURT Bombay High court CASE NO Criminal application CASE TYPE Criminal PETITIONER Abdul Wahid RESPONDENT State of Maharashtra BENCH Justice Deshpande, W.M. Read more…
INTRODUCTION: The petitioner requests guidance to take the necessary action to prevent anyone from running in more than one constituency at once in an election for the “same office” by the central government and the Indian Election Commission. The court asked the Union government and the Election Commission to “take Read more…
![FOSS V. HARBOTTLE [1843] 67 ER 189, (1843) 2 HARE 461](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Screenshot-2023-04-08-134520-360x240.png)
FOSS V. HARBOTTLE [1843] 67 ER 189, (1843) 2 HARE 461 Introduction: Foss v. Harbottle is a landmark case in the field of corporate law. The case was heard in 1843 in the Court of Chancery in England. The case was based on the principles of minority shareholder rights and Read more…
OVERVIEW FACTS: ISSUES RAISED: The main issues raised by the Apex court were – ARGUMENTS: Petitioner’s Arguments: Respondents’ Arguments: JUDGEMENT/ ANALYSIS Regarding the first issue, the court held that the state was obligated to produce the orders before the court. Due to non-compliance of the state with the court’s directions Read more…
GENERAL INFORMATION FACTS OF THE CASE ISSUES RAISEDWhether the Supreme court by making additional laws can disqualify the membership of Parliament exceeding Article 102 (a) to Article 102 (e)? ARGUMENTS FROM THE APPELANT SIDE ARGUMENTS FROM THE RESPONDENT SIDE RELATED PROVISIONSConstitution of IndiaArticle 129:- Supreme Court to be a court Read more…