Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
      • Bail
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

CASE

UNDERSTANDING VICARIOUS LIABILITY, STRICT LIABILITY, AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY UNDER TORT LAW
Law of Tort

UNDERSTANDING VICARIOUS LIABILITY, STRICT LIABILITY, AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY UNDER TORT LAW

This article is written by Rajhansh of 3rd Semester of BA LLB of RNB Global University, Bikaner, an intern under Legal Vidhiya. ABSTRACT This article explains legal doctrine vicarious liability, strict liability and absolute liability which falls under tort law. These concepts are important for determining the degree of responsibility Read more

By Admin, 11 monthsOctober 16, 2024 ago
CONFLICT BETWEEN INTERESTS AND DUTY, DUTY TO COURT, DUTY TO CLIENT, DUTY TO OPPONENT
Article

CONFLICT BETWEEN INTERESTS AND DUTY, DUTY TO COURT, DUTY TO CLIENT, DUTY TO OPPONENT

This article is written by Purvika Kirmire of 5th Semester of GLC Mumbai, an intern under Legal Vidhiya Abstract This article lays down various duties of an advocate towards his client, towards court, towards his opponent. How he/she has to present themselves with dignity, respect the courts dignity, show right Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsAugust 10, 2023 ago
Case Laws

RAGHU RAJ SINGH ROUSHA Vs SHIVAM SUNDARAM PROMOTERS (P) L

Introduction: In this case, the complainant filed by the respondent herein against the petitioners and numerous form others for the commission of an offense punishable under section 500/34 of the Indian penal code the petitioner has contested the accuracy and legality of the order learned Metropolitan Magistrate on January 15, Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

State of Karnataka vs Shivanna @ Tarkari Shivanna, 2014

The present case is a criminal appeal in which the state of Karnataka is the petitioner and Shivanna @ Tarkari Shivanna was the respondent. The case was decided on April 25, 2014, by the two-judge bench comprising of Hon’ble Mrs. Gyan Sudha Misra and Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Gopala Gowda. Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

VASANTI DUBEY VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.166 OF 2012

Introduction of the Case Vasanti Dubey vs State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.166 of 2012, arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.1548/2011, was a case that dealt with the abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case involved allegations that the accused, Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 ago
Case Laws

(Nicaragua v. The United States of America,1986)

CASE CONCERNING MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (Nicaragua v. The United States of America,1986) Case Name Case Concerning Military And Paramilitary Activities In And Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. The United States of America, 1986) Equivalent Citation Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (The Republic of Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsApril 8, 2023 ago
Company Law Top Stories

Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd (1897) A.C.22

Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd (1897) A.C.22 The principle of separate legal entity was explained and emphasized in the famous case of Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. Fact of the case Salomon was a leather merchant, he was sole proprietor of his business. In 1892, he decided to Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 25, 2022 ago

Visitor Count
2605529
Users Today : 2100
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle