CITATION (2000) 4 SCC 75 YEAR OF JUDGEMENT 2000 PETITIONER STATE OF KARNATAKA RESPONDENT KRISHANAPPA STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE INDIAN PENAL CODE BENCH HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE. A.A.S. ANAND HON’BLE JUS. R LAHOTI, HON’BLE JUS S. S. VARIAVA INTRODUCTION The ruling in State of Karnataka v. Krishnappa (2000) was an important judgment Read more…
This article is written by Neha Parveen of BA-LLB of 10th Semester of SOA University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya Abstract The Indian Evidence Act of 1872 (IEA) and the proposed Bharatiya Sakshya Bill of 2023 (BSB) are the main subjects of this comparative study, which looks at the legislative Read more…
This article is written by Mehak Gurung of Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, an intern under Legal Vidhiya Abstract This article navigates the historical evolution of signatures, tracing the path from wax seals to the contemporary realm of digital signatures. Focused on legal and technological perspectives, it explores the legislative Read more…
Citation (2022) 3 MPC 696 Date of Judgment 22 June, 2022 Court High Court Case Type Criminal appeal Appellants Sanjay SinghBabua @ Rajiv SinghRajendra Singh Respondent State of Madhya Pradesh. Bench Hon’ble Justice Shri Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia & Hon’ble Justice Shri Rajeev Kumar Shrivastav Referred Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 Juvenile Justice Read more…
Case number Criminal Appeal No. 907 of 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 3336 of 2006) Judges Altamas Kabir and Cyriac Joseph, JJ. Statutes Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 – Sections 2, 3, 4, 7A, 7A(1), 7A(2), 15, 18, 20, 49, 49(1), 49(2) and 64; Read more…
This article is written by SAKIB SHERGUL PATHAN of 5th Semester of K.L.E Society’s Law College, Bengaluru, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT: The Information Technology Act, 2000, stands as a pivotal piece of legislation in India’s digital transformation journey. As the technological landscape continually evolves, the interpretation and implementation Read more…
Namathoti Sankaramma vs State of A.P. And Ors. on 15 September 2000 Overview of the Case: Citation 2000 (2) ALD Cri 588 Date of Judgment 29/05/2000 Court High Court of Andhra Case Type Cri. P. No. 178 of 2000 Appellant Namathoti Sankaramma Respondent State of A.P. And Ors. Bench V. Rao Read more…
This article is written by Divyanshi Gupta of 2nd Semester of Lloyd School of Law, Greater Noida In India, the design was cancelled. Section 19 of the Indian Design Act 2000 allows for the cancellation of a registered design if one or more of the following conditions are met: the Read more…
Written by – Ananya Shri Singh BALLB (HONS) – 3rd year of Indore Institute of Law, Madhya Pradesh ABSTRACT The interest of an individual must be protected so that the original work is not exploited or used unauthoritative. Further, the protection of such original work is ensued through a mechanism provided Read more…
