Spread the love

This article is written by Jagat Pal Singh Gohil [Provision for Bail under the Code], Army Law College, Pune.

Introduction:

The provision for bail is a critical aspect of the criminal justice system, and it ensures that an accused person is not deprived of his/her liberty without due process of law. The right to bail is enshrined in the Indian Constitution, and the Code of Criminal Procedure lays down the procedure for granting bail to an accused person. The grant of bail is an essential component of the criminal justice system as it balances the interests of the accused, who has a right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, and the interests of society, which require protection from the alleged offender.

The provision for bail is governed by Section 436 to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 436 lays down the general rule that bail should be granted to an accused person unless there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused would abscond or interfere with the investigation. However, the grant of bail is subject to the discretion of the court, which considers several factors, such as the nature of the offence, the severity of the punishment, the likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice, and the possibility of the accused tampering with the evidence.

The grant of bail is not an absolute right, and there are several challenges and concerns related to the provision for bail. One of the most significant concerns is the misuse of the bail provisions by the accused, who may flee from justice or tamper with the evidence. Another concern is the issue of under-trial prisoners, who may be detained for long periods without trial due to the slow pace of the justice system.

Overall, the provision for bail is an essential aspect of the criminal justice system, and it ensures that an accused person is not deprived of his/her liberty without due process of law. While the grant of bail is subject to the discretion of the court, a balanced approach must be taken that protects the rights of the accused while ensuring the safety and security of society.

Definition of Bail

Bail is a legal arrangement that allows a person who has been arrested for a criminal offense to be released from custody while awaiting trial or other legal proceedings. Bail can be granted in exchange for a sum of money, property, or a promise to appear in court when required. The primary objective of bail is to guarantee the defendant’s presence in court for all hearings and to prevent any potential threat to the community.

Importance of Bail in the Criminal Justice System

Bail plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system. It allows individuals who have been accused of a crime to maintain their freedom while awaiting trial, which is important because it ensures that they can continue to support themselves and their families. Additionally, bail can help to reduce jail overcrowding, which is a major problem in many areas. By allowing defendants to be released on bail, the criminal justice system can focus on more serious cases and reduce the burden on the system.

Furthermore, bail is an essential component of the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle of the justice system. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and bail allows them to maintain their innocence until they are convicted. Without bail, innocent people could be forced to remain in jail for extended periods of time, which is a violation of their basic rights.

Overview of Bail Provisions under the Code

Under the Criminal Procedure Code, the provisions relating to bail are primarily governed by Section 436 to Section 450. Section 436 provides for the grant of bail to a person who has been arrested without a warrant for an offense punishable with imprisonment for less than seven years. Section 437 provides for the grant of bail to a person who has been arrested for an offense punishable with imprisonment for seven years or more, or for an offense under Chapter VI, Chapter XVI, or Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code.

The court may grant bail to a person on the basis of various factors, such as the nature and gravity of the offense, the evidence against the accused, the likelihood of the accused absconding, and the likelihood of the accused interfering with the investigation. Bail may be granted with or without sureties, and the court may impose certain conditions on the accused, such as surrendering their passport or reporting to the police station regularly.

In cases where the accused is unable to furnish bail, Section 436A provides for the release of the accused on personal bond, subject to certain conditions. Additionally, Section 439 provides for the High Court or the Court of Session to grant bail to a person who has been denied bail by the lower court. However, in certain cases, such as those involving terrorism, organized crime, or economic offenses, bail may be difficult to obtain.

Types of Bail

Bail is a legal procedure that allows an accused person to be released from custody while awaiting trial. There are different types of bail that can be granted based on the circumstances of the case. Here are the four types of bail:

  1. Regular Bail: This type of bail is granted to an accused person after they have been arrested and produced before the court. The court may grant regular bail if it is satisfied that the accused is not likely to abscond or tamper with the evidence. Regular bail can be granted for both bailable and non-bailable offenses.
  2. Anticipatory Bail: Anticipatory bail is a type of bail that is granted to a person before they are actually arrested. This type of bail is granted by the court if it is satisfied that the person is likely to be arrested for a non-bailable offense. The purpose of anticipatory bail is to protect the person from arrest and detention.
  3. Interim Bail: Interim bail is a type of bail that is granted for a short period of time, usually until the next hearing. This type of bail is granted when the court needs more time to make a decision on the regular bail application. Interim bail can be granted for both bailable and non-bailable offenses.
  4. Default Bail: Default bail is a type of bail that is granted automatically if the court fails to make a decision on the regular bail application within a specified time period. The time period varies depending on the offense and the jurisdiction. Default bail is granted to ensure that an accused person is not detained for an extended period of time without a decision from the court.

These are the four types of bail that can be granted in a criminal case. It is important to note that the granting of bail is at the discretion of the court and depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Grounds for Granting Bail

Bail is a legal concept that refers to the release of an accused person from custody on certain conditions before their trial or hearing. The grounds for granting bail can vary from one jurisdiction to another, but some common factors are considered when determining whether to grant bail to an accused person. Here are five commonly recognized grounds for granting bail:

  1. Presumption of Innocence: The principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is a fundamental principle of criminal law. Therefore, an accused person is presumed innocent until they are proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This presumption of innocence also applies to bail applications. If the accused is presumed innocent, they are entitled to bail unless there are compelling reasons to deny bail.
  2. Gravity of Offence: The nature and seriousness of the offence are crucial factors in determining whether to grant bail. Serious crimes such as murder, terrorism, or drug trafficking are considered as non-bailable offences, whereas less serious crimes such as theft or petty larceny may be bailable. The court will also consider the circumstances surrounding the offence, the potential penalties, and the likelihood of the accused fleeing.
  3. Likelihood of Fleeing from Justice: The primary purpose of bail is to ensure that the accused attends their trial or hearing. If the court believes that the accused may flee and avoid their trial, bail may be denied. Factors that may be considered when assessing the likelihood of fleeing include the accused’s ties to the community, their criminal history, and their access to financial resources.
  4. Possibility of Tampering with Evidence: Another ground for denying bail is if the accused is likely to interfere with the evidence or witnesses in the case. This could involve intimidating witnesses, destroying evidence or influencing other parties involved in the case. If the court believes that the accused is a threat to the integrity of the case, they may deny bail.
  5. Health and Age of the Accused: The court may consider the health and age of the accused when assessing their suitability for bail. If the accused is elderly or has health issues that require ongoing medical care, the court may consider releasing them on bail. However, this will depend on the nature of the offence, the likelihood of fleeing, and the possibility of tampering with evidence.

The grounds for granting bail depend on various factors, including the nature and seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of fleeing, and the possibility of tampering with evidence. The court will weigh these factors and make a decision based on the evidence presented before them. It is essential to note that bail is not a guaranteed right, and the court may deny bail if they believe that it is in the interest of justice to do so.

Procedure for Obtaining Bail

Bail is the temporary release of an accused person from custody, who has been arrested for a criminal offense, on the condition that they will return to court for further proceedings. The process of obtaining bail involves a series of steps, which are as follows:

  1. Filing of Bail Application: The first step in obtaining bail is the filing of a bail application. The accused or their lawyer can file a bail application in the court where the case is being heard. The bail application should contain all the necessary details, such as the nature of the offense, the reasons why the accused is seeking bail, and any relevant documents or evidence to support the bail application.
  2. Hearing of Bail Application: Once the bail application has been filed, the court will fix a date for the hearing of the bail application. During the hearing, the court will consider various factors, such as the nature of the offense, the severity of the punishment, the likelihood of the accused fleeing the jurisdiction, and the likelihood of the accused interfering with the investigation or the witnesses. The court will also take into account the past criminal record of the accused, if any.
  3. Factors Considered by the Court while Granting Bail: While granting bail, the court considers the following factors:
  4. Nature of the Offense: The court will consider the seriousness of the offense and whether it is a bailable offense or not. If the offense is of a serious nature, such as a heinous crime, the court may not grant bail.
  5. Severity of Punishment: The court will consider the severity of the punishment that the accused is likely to face if convicted. If the punishment is severe, the court may be reluctant to grant bail.
  6. Likelihood of the Accused Fleeing the Jurisdiction: The court will consider whether the accused is likely to flee the jurisdiction if granted bail. If the accused is a flight risk, the court may deny bail.
  7. Likelihood of Interference with the Investigation or Witnesses: The court will consider whether the accused is likely to interfere with the investigation or the witnesses if granted bail. If the accused is likely to do so, the court may deny bail.

These grounds for granting bail are determined based on various factors, including the nature and seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of fleeing, and the possibility of tampering with evidence. The decision to grant bail is at the discretion of the court, and it is not a guaranteed right. The court will consider all the evidence presented before them and make a decision that is in the interest of justice.

Conditions for Granting Bail


Bail is a temporary release from custody granted to an accused person who is awaiting trial for a criminal offense. Bail is granted to ensure the accused’s appearance in court for trial and to prevent the accused from absconding or interfering with the investigation or witnesses. There are various conditions that a court may impose when granting bail to an accused person. In this article, we will discuss the five common conditions for granting bail.

  1. Personal Bond: A personal bond is an agreement between the accused and the court, where the accused promises to appear in court on the date and time of trial. This bond does not require any money to be paid, but the accused must sign a written agreement stating that they will comply with all conditions imposed by the court. The court may require the accused to provide some form of identification or report regularly to the police station.
  2. Surety Bond: A surety bond is a written agreement between the accused, the court, and a third party, commonly known as a surety. The surety is usually a family member or a friend of the accused who is willing to take responsibility for the accused’s appearance in court. The surety is required to deposit an amount of money with the court as a guarantee that the accused will appear in court on the specified date. If the accused fails to appear, the surety forfeits the money to the court.
  3. Payment of Bail Amount: The court may require the accused to deposit a sum of money as a guarantee that they will appear in court on the specified date. The amount of bail varies depending on the severity of the offense and the likelihood of the accused fleeing or interfering with the investigation. Once the trial is completed, and the accused has complied with all the conditions of the bail, the bail amount is refunded to the accused.
  4. Surrender of Passport: If the accused is a foreign national, the court may require them to surrender their passport to prevent them from leaving the country before the trial is completed. The passport is returned to the accused once the trial is completed, and all the conditions of the bail have been complied with.
  5. Restriction on Travel: The court may impose restrictions on the accused’s travel to prevent them from leaving the state or the country before the trial is completed. The accused may be required to report regularly to the police station or seek permission from the court before traveling outside the designated area.

The conditions for granting bail vary depending on the nature of the offense and the accused’s likelihood of fleeing or interfering with the investigation. Personal bonds, surety bonds, payment of bail amount, surrender of passport, and restrictions on travel are the most common conditions that the court may impose. It is essential to comply with all the conditions imposed by the court to avoid any penalties or revocation of the bail.

The Cancellation of Bail

Cancellation of bail refers to the process of revoking bail granted to an accused person before the conclusion of their trial. Bail is granted to an accused person as a way of ensuring their appearance in court for trial. However, bail can be cancelled if the court finds that the accused has violated the terms and conditions of their bail or if it is in the interest of justice to do so. In this article, we will discuss the grounds for cancellation of bail, the procedure for cancellation of bail, and the remedies available to the accused.

Grounds for Cancellation of Bail:

There are various grounds on which bail can be cancelled. These include:

  1. Violation of bail conditions: If the accused person violates the terms and conditions of their bail, such as failing to report to the police station, leaving the country, or failing to appear in court, their bail can be cancelled.
  2. Commission of a new offence: If the accused person is charged with a new offence while out on bail, their bail can be cancelled.
  3. Interference with witnesses or evidence: If the accused person interferes with witnesses or evidence, their bail can be cancelled.
  4. Flight risk: If the court has reason to believe that the accused person is a flight risk, their bail can be cancelled.
  5. Public safety: If the court is of the opinion that the release of the accused person on bail would pose a threat to public safety, their bail can be cancelled.

Procedure for Cancellation of Bail:

The procedure for cancellation of bail may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Generally, the following steps are taken:

  1. Application: The prosecutor or the police may file an application with the court seeking cancellation of bail. The application must state the grounds on which bail is being sought to be cancelled.
  2. Notice: The court will issue a notice to the accused person and their surety informing them of the application for cancellation of bail.
  3. Hearing: The court will conduct a hearing where the accused person will be given an opportunity to respond to the application for cancellation of bail.
  4. Order: After considering the arguments of both sides, the court will make an order either cancelling the bail or allowing it to continue.

Remedies Available to the Accused:

If bail is cancelled, the accused person can take the following remedies:

  1. Bail Review: The accused person can apply for a review of the bail order. This involves making an application to the higher court to review the decision of the lower court.
  2. Appeal: The accused person can appeal against the decision of the court to cancel their bail. This involves making an application to the higher court to appeal against the decision of the lower court.
  3. Surrender: The accused person can surrender themselves to the police and request for a fresh bail application.

It is important to note that the cancellation of bail is a serious matter that can have serious consequences for the accused person. If their bail is cancelled, they may be remanded in custody until the conclusion of their trial, which can take months or even years. This can have a significant impact on their personal and professional life, as well as their mental and emotional wellbeing.

Therefore, it is important for the accused person to comply with the terms and conditions of their bail and to avoid any behavior that may lead to the cancellation of their bail. If they are unsure about the terms and conditions of their bail, they should seek legal advice.

Cancellation of bail is a legal process that can occur if an accused person violates the terms and conditions of their bail, commits a new offence, interferes with witnesses or evidence, is a flight risk, or poses a threat to public safety. The procedure for cancellation of bail involves an application, notice, hearing, and order. The accused person can take remedies such as bail review, appeal, or surrender in case their bail is cancelled. It is important for the accused person to comply with the terms and conditions of their bail to avoid any consequences that may arise from the cancellation of their bail.

Role of the Judiciary in Granting Bail

The judiciary plays a critical role in the criminal justice system, including the granting of bail. Bail is an important legal tool that allows an accused person to be released from custody pending their trial. In this essay, we will discuss the role of the judiciary in granting bail, including its powers, judicial pronouncements on bail provisions, and criticism of the judiciary in granting bail.

  • Powers of the Judiciary

The judiciary is an independent and impartial institution with the power to interpret and apply the law. It has the power to grant bail to an accused person if it deems fit. The judiciary considers several factors when deciding whether to grant bail, including the nature and severity of the offense, the accused person’s criminal record, the likelihood of the accused person fleeing from justice, and the risk of the accused person interfering with witnesses or evidence.

The judiciary has the power to impose conditions on bail to ensure that the accused person complies with the terms of their release. These conditions may include reporting to a police station regularly, surrendering their passport, refraining from contacting witnesses, or staying away from certain areas. If an accused person violates their bail conditions, the judiciary may revoke their bail and order them to be taken into custody.

  • Judicial Pronouncements on Bail Provisions

Over the years, the judiciary has made several pronouncements on bail provisions. In India, the Constitution guarantees the right to bail, except in certain circumstances, such as when the offense is punishable by death or life imprisonment. The Supreme Court of India has emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, meaning that an accused person should be granted bail unless there are compelling reasons to keep them in custody.

The judiciary has also emphasized that the grant of bail should be based on the facts and circumstances of each case. In other words, the judiciary should not adopt a one-size-fits-all approach to bail. The judiciary should consider the unique circumstances of each case when deciding whether to grant bail.

  • Criticism of the Judiciary in Granting Bail

Despite the judiciary’s important role in granting bail, it has been criticized for its approach in certain cases. Critics have argued that the judiciary is too lenient in granting bail to accused persons, especially those accused of serious offenses such as murder or rape. They argue that accused persons may use their freedom to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence.

On the other hand, some critics have argued that the judiciary is too strict in granting bail, especially to underprivileged sections of society such as the poor and marginalized. They argue that these sections of society often do not have the resources to secure bail, and as a result, they are kept in custody for extended periods, even for minor offenses.

Bail Provisions in Special Cases 

Bail provisions in special cases refer to the specific circumstances and conditions under which an accused person can be granted bail. There are various factors that courts take into consideration when determining whether to grant bail, including the severity of the crime, the likelihood of the accused person fleeing, and the potential danger to society. Here are the details of bail provisions in special cases:

  • Bail in Non-Bailable Offences: Non-bailable offenses are serious criminal offenses that are punishable with imprisonment for more than three years. These include offenses like murder, rape, and kidnapping. In such cases, bail is not an absolute right, and the accused person has to prove that he or she is not guilty. The court will consider factors such as the nature of the offense, the evidence against the accused person, and the likelihood of the accused person fleeing or tampering with evidence before granting bail.
  • Bail in Economic Offences: Economic offenses include crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, and money laundering. In such cases, the accused person may be granted bail if he or she can prove that he or she has not committed the offense, and there is no likelihood of the accused person fleeing or tampering with evidence. The court may also require the accused person to provide a certain amount of security or surety to secure the bail.
  • Bail in Cases Involving Minors: Cases involving minors are dealt with differently, and the court takes into consideration the age and maturity of the accused person. In such cases, the court may release the accused person on bail if he or she is a minor and has no prior criminal record. The court may also require the accused person to be released into the custody of his or her parents or guardians. The court may also impose other conditions such as a curfew or restriction on the accused person’s movements.
  • Bail in Cases of Domestic Violence: Domestic violence cases are serious offenses, and the accused person may be denied bail if the court believes that the accused person is a threat to the victim. In such cases, the court may require the accused person to stay away from the victim and may also impose other conditions such as electronic monitoring or counseling as a condition for granting bail.

Bail and Human Rights

Bail is a fundamental human right enshrined in the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to personal liberty under Article 21. Bail is the temporary release of an accused person from custody while awaiting trial or some other legal proceeding. The right to bail is a crucial aspect of the criminal justice system as it protects the fundamental human rights of an accused person. Let’s discuss the relationship between bail and human rights:

  1. Right to Personal Liberty: The right to personal liberty is a fundamental human right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This right ensures that no person can be deprived of their liberty without due process of law. The right to bail is an essential aspect of the right to personal liberty. An accused person has the right to seek bail if they are detained or arrested. This right is protected by law, and any violation of this right can be challenged in court.
  2. Right to a Fair Trial: The right to a fair trial is another fundamental human right guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. This right ensures that every person is entitled to a fair and impartial trial. Bail is an essential aspect of the right to a fair trial as it enables an accused person to prepare for their trial while not in custody. The absence of bail can lead to an accused person being detained for extended periods without a trial, violating their right to a fair trial.
  3. Right to Legal Aid: The right to legal aid is a fundamental human right that ensures that every person has access to legal representation. This right is particularly important for an accused person seeking bail as legal aid can help ensure that their bail application is filed correctly, and all necessary documents are submitted. Legal aid can also help an accused person understand their rights and navigate the legal system.
  4. Balancing the Rights of the Accused and Society: Bail is a crucial aspect of the criminal justice system as it enables an accused person to be released from custody while awaiting trial. However, the right to bail must be balanced against the rights of society to ensure that an accused person does not pose a threat to society. The court must consider the seriousness of the crime, the likelihood of the accused person absconding or tampering with evidence, and the possibility of the accused person committing another crime while out on bail. In balancing the rights of the accused and society, the court must ensure that the accused person’s fundamental human rights are not violated.

Bail is a fundamental human right that protects an accused person’s right to personal liberty, right to a fair trial, and right to legal aid. The right to bail must be balanced against the rights of society to ensure that justice is served. It is the responsibility of the court to ensure that an accused person’s fundamental human rights are not violated while balancing the rights of the accused and society.

The legal framework surrounding bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure in India

Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) – Sections 436 to 450 of the CrPC lay down the provisions relating to bail.

Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Section 437 of the IPC deals with the non-bailable offences and Section 439 of the IPC deals with the power of the High Court or Court of Session to grant bail in such cases.

Constitution of India – Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to seek bail in case of arrest.

The Bail Act, 2015 – This act provides for the procedure for granting bail and the conditions to be imposed while granting bail.

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 – This act provides for the stringent provisions for bail in cases of sexual offences against women, including the provision for a mandatory waiting period of 15 days before granting bail.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – This act governs the provisions relating to bail for juveniles in conflict with the law.

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – This act provides for strict provisions for bail in cases related to narcotics and psychotropic substances.

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – This act deals with the provisions related to bail in cases of money laundering.

The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 – This act provides for strict provisions for bail in cases related to terrorism and disruptive activities.

Important Case Laws on Provision for Bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure: –

The provision for bail in India is governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The CrPC provides for bail to be granted to a person accused of an offence, subject to certain conditions. The following are some of the important case laws on provision for bail under the Code:

  1. Sanjay Chandra v. CBI (2012) – In this case, the Supreme Court held that economic offences committed by large corporations, which affect the economy of the country, are grave in nature and therefore, bail should not be granted to the accused easily.
  2. State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977) – In this case, the Supreme Court held that bail is a rule and jail is an exception. The court also laid down some factors that should be taken into consideration while granting bail, such as the nature and gravity of the offence, the antecedents of the accused, and the possibility of the accused fleeing from justice.
  3. Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra (2011) – In this case, the Supreme Court held that while deciding on bail, the court should balance the interests of the accused, the victim, and the society. The court should also take into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, the prima facie case against the accused, and the likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice.
  4. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) – In this case, the Supreme Court held that while granting bail, the court should not go into the merits of the case or weigh the evidence against the accused. The court should only examine whether the accused is likely to tamper with the evidence or abscond from justice.
  5. Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav (2004) – In this case, the Supreme Court held that the power to grant bail should be exercised judiciously and not mechanically. The court should take into consideration the facts and circumstances of each case while granting bail.

Summary

Bail is an essential component of India’s criminal justice system. It allows the accused to remain free until their trial while ensuring their attendance in court. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the various aspects of bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure in India. It discusses the definition of bail, grounds for granting bail, conditions for granting bail, bail provisions in special cases, the role of the judiciary in granting bail, the cancellation of bail, the procedure for obtaining bail, bail and human rights, and the legal framework surrounding bail. Overall, the article highlights the importance of bail in ensuring a fair trial and upholding the principles of justice and human rights.

Conclusion

Bail is a fundamental right that protects the interests of both the accused and the state. The provisions for granting bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure in India are designed to strike a balance between the rights of the accused and the needs of justice. The judiciary plays a crucial role in ensuring that bail is granted fairly and impartially. However, the process of obtaining bail can be complex, and the cancellation of bail can have serious consequences. The legal framework surrounding bail in India must be continuously evaluated and updated to ensure that it remains relevant and effective in upholding the principles of justice and human rights. Ultimately, the proper administration of bail is critical to ensuring a fair and just criminal justice system.

REFERENCES

S. no.Topic and Reference Link
01Bail Reform – Criminal Lawyer News (criminal-lawyer-news.com)
02Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception                   – Legal Thirst
03Difference between Anticipatory Bail and Regular Bail (vishalsainiadv.com)
04Declining heinous crime rates in Delhi but at the same time raised 6% theft cases (legalserviceindia.com)
05Detailed Study of Bail in India 1 LexForti Legal Journal 2019-2020 (heinonline.org)
06The Right to Bail Under Indian Criminal Procedural Law by Ankita Rustogi :: SSRN
07Human Rights and Bail – R. Sharma – Google Books
08criminal-procedure-code.pdf (crpc.in)

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *