OBSERVATION HOMES UNDER JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

Advertisements

Spread the love

Post Views: 2,586

This article is written by K Maria Yoshitha of 5^th Semester of Amity Law School, Noida.

Abstract: The paper aims to present an in-depth review of observation houses within the confines of the Juvenile Justice Board. Juvenile criminals’ rehabilitation and reintegration into society are significantly supported by observation houses. The importance of observation homes within the juvenile justice system including the legislative framework controlling their operation, the difficulties observation homes encounter, and suggestions for their development is discussed. This study aims to contribute to the continuing discussion on juvenile justice and the defense of young offenders’ rights by exploring the various aspects of observation houses.

Keywords: Observation homes, Juvenile justice system, Juvenile offenders, child Rehabilitation, childcare institutions

I Introduction

The juvenile justice system in India is an integral part of the broader criminal justice system, was created to safeguard the rights and welfare of children who are in violation of the law. In this system, observation homes are crucial in providing juvenile offenders with care, security, and rehabilitation. Understanding the history and significance of observation homes is crucial to understand their role in the juvenile justice system and the difficulties they’re confronted with in attaining their goals.

1.1 The Indian Juvenile Justice System’s Background

The juvenile justice system in India is a specialized legal structure designed to accommodate the particular requirements and vulnerabilities of minors accused of crimes. According to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015, a juvenile in India is a person who is under the age of 18. The legal framework for the protection, care, and rehabilitation of children who have run afoul of the law is provided by this Act.

The Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) is one of the most important organizations in India’s juvenile justice system. The JJB is a quasi-judicial organization tasked with making sure juvenile offenders receive fair and reasonable treatment in court.

Its primary function is to choose the best courses of action for the juvenile offender’s rehabilitation and reintegration. It is constituted of a magistrate and two social workers.

1.2. The Value and Need for Observation Homes

Specialized residential facilities known as “observation homes” are set aside for the temporary custody and care of young offenders while their cases are pending. Within the juvenile justice system, these homes have several uses. First and foremost, they offer young people a safe and secure setting where they can be watched, evaluated, and given the right kind of care. Young offenders’ rights are crucially protected by observation homes, who make sure they are not harmed or treated unfairly.

Second, juvenile offenders can receive rehabilitation and be reintegrated into society in observation homes. They seek to deal with the underlying issues that led to the juvenile’s involvement in criminal activity and offer them the support and direction they need to grow up successfully. In order to help young people reintegrate into society, observation homes offer them access to education, skill development programmes, counselling services, and other necessary interventions.

1.3. Research Objectives and Methodologies

Conducting a thorough analysis of observation homes within the Indian juvenile justice system is the main goal of this study. The study seeks to accomplish the following particular goals:
Investigate the origins, legal framework, and subsequent reforms of observation homes throughout India’s history.
As you consider the importance and purpose of observation homes in the context of the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders, be sure to emphasize how they protect children’s rights and advance their general well-being.
Review the operation and success of observation homes in achieving their goals, taking into account elements like infrastructure, staff training, service accessibility, and adherence to legal and procedural safeguards.
Identify the difficulties and limitations that observation homes face, such as issues with overcrowding, insufficient funding, a lack of specialized programmes, and systemic obstacles to efficient rehabilitation.
To improve outcomes for young offenders and advance a more equitable and reparative juvenile justice system, suggest recommendations and policy interventions to address the identified challenges and improve the operation of observation homes.

This study will combine qualitative and quantitative research methodologies to reach its objectives. It will entail a thorough analysis of the existing literature, which will include pertinent laws, regulations, and academic works. Case studies and interviews with important stakeholders, including officials from observation homes, child rights advocates, and subject-matter experts, will also give important insights into the real-world issues and difficulties that observation homes face.

By conducting this study, we hope to add to the body of knowledge already available on observation homes and their function in the juvenile justice system in India. The study’s conclusions and suggestions are intended to help develop policy, enhance the operation of observation homes, and ultimately help make juvenile justice more efficient and rights-based approach in India.

II The Juvenile Justice System and Observation Homes
The juvenile justice system in India is developed to take care of the unique requirements and vulnerabilities of young offenders who interact with the criminal justice system[1]. A person who has not reached the age at which they should be treated as adults by the criminal justice system is referred to as a juvenile. The primary law governing the juvenile justice system in India is the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015[2]. It aims to give children who are in conflict with the law – care, protection, and rehabilitation.

Children under the age of seven are exempt from criminal responsibility under the Indian Penal Code of 1860, and those between the ages of seven and twelve are deemed to be too young to understand the nature and repercussions of their behaviour.[3] In accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, juvenile offenders were given specialized care and could be committed to reformatory institutions or placed on probation for good behaviour until they turned twenty-one.[4]

Numerous laws and reforms have been implemented over time to enhance India’s juvenile justice system. The Juvenile Justice Act of 1986 sought to correct the system’s inequities in standards and procedures[5].The comprehensive Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 later took its place and made additional changes. in 2006.[6] The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, which was passed to replace the prior law, included provisions for the adult trial of 16 to 18-year-old juveniles accused of heinous crimes[7]

2.1 Role and Importance of Observation Homes

The juvenile justice system heavily relies on observation homes. These homes serve as temporary residential facilities where young people are housed while their cases are pending[8].The main goal of observation homes is to evaluate the needs and behaviour of young people and offer them a secure and encouraging environment for recovery and reintegration.

Observation homes act as a link between the judicial process and the juveniles’ rehabilitation. They offer foundational services like instruction, medical care, counselling, and skill-building programmes that are specifically designed to meet the needs of young people[9].The goal of observation homes is to support juveniles’ physical, mental, and emotional development and enable their successful reintegration back into society by providing a structured and nurturing environment.

2.2 Legal Framework and Guidelines

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015 provides a legal framework that controls the operation of observation homes[10].In addition to outlining the roles of the State Government, Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs), and Child Welfare Committees (CWCs) in overseeing their operation, this legislation outlines the establishment, management, and regulation of observation homes.

A number of rules and regulations have also been published to guarantee the efficient operation of observation homes. The Model Guidelines for Homes under the Juvenile Justice Act, developed by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, offer thorough guidance on the facilities, staffing, services, and legal rights of juveniles residing in observation homes[11].

In order to protect the rights of children, including their right to an education, access to healthcare, protection from abuse, and opportunities for rehabilitation. They focus on child-centric strategies, individualized care plans, and the participation of qualified experts in overseeing observation homes. [12]

III. Functions and Structure of Observation Homes

Observation homes are essential to the juvenile justice system because they offer a secure and encouraging setting for the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders. These facilities are made to meet the unique requirements of young offenders and to advance their general wellbeing. With a focus on their role in the rehabilitation process, the residential facilities and services they provide, and the staffing and training needs, we will examine the roles and structures of observation homes in this section.

3.1. Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Juvenile Offenders

Primarily they have been established with the objective of rehabilitating juvenile offenders and preparing them for successful reintegration into society. The goal of rehabilitation programs in observation homes is to deal with the root causes of delinquency and give young people the tools and support they need to live law-abiding lives. These programs frequently offer counselling, educational, and vocational services that are catered to the specific requirements of each young offender [13]

The development of pro-social behaviours, good values, and life skills is prioritized during the rehabilitation process in observation homes. It may include therapeutic interventions, counselling sessions, mental health interventions, vocational training, and treatment for substance abuse. The objective is to provide young offenders with the opportunities and resources they need to reintegrate into their communities as responsible and productive citizens [14]

3.2. Residential Facilities and Services

For the duration of their stay, juvenile offenders are given a safe and encouraging residential environment in observation homes. These facilities frequently have sufficient amenities and infrastructure to satisfy residents’ basic needs. The living arrangements in observation homes are intended to foster a supportive environment that encourages healing and personal development.

There may be dormitory-style living quarters, recreation areas, educational facilities, dining areas, as well as medical and psychological support services inside observation homes. The physical setting is intended to support the juveniles’ rehabilitation and reintegration while ensuring their safety, comfort, and well-being [15].

3.3. Staffing and Training Requirements

For observation homes to effectively serve the needs of young offenders, they need a committed and trained staff. Depending on the facility’s size and capacity, the staffing needs may change. Typically, social workers, counsellors, psychologists, educators, medical professionals, and security personnel make up the multidisciplinary teams that work in observation homes.

Employees in observation homes should be qualified, skilled, and trained to deal with juvenile offenders. They ought to be knowledgeable about child development, trauma-informed care, counselling methods, and behaviour control techniques. The staff members must participate in ongoing professional development and training programmes to stay informed about the most effective methods for juvenile rehabilitation and to help foster a supportive and therapeutic environment (Roberts, 2017).

When observation homes adhere to established guidelines and standards, they can efficiently provide care and carry out their responsibilities within the juvenile justice system. The successful reintegration of young offenders into society is facilitated by carefully planned residential facilities, extensive rehabilitation programmes, and a well-trained staff.

4. Challenges Faced by Observation Homes

Observation homes, despite playing a significant role in the juvenile justice system, encounter a number of difficulties that make it difficult for them to successfully carry out their mandate of rehabilitating and reintegrating young offenders. These difficulties range from poor staffing and infrastructure to a dearth of specialized programmes and bureaucratic restrictions. To ensure that observation homes operate effectively and that the young people in their care have positive outcomes, these issues must be resolved.

4.1 Overcrowding and Infrastructure Issues

Overcrowding and poor infrastructure are two issues that observation homes frequently encounter. Due to a lack of space and a high influx of juvenile offenders, living conditions are frequently crowded, endangering the juveniles’ health and chances of rehabilitation. The issue is made worse by the absence of adequate infrastructure, such as separate dormitories, common spaces, and educational facilities.

In India, judicial oversight of observation home overcrowding has been a topic of discussion. The Supreme Court of India emphasized the need for adequate infrastructure in observation homes in Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, and it instructed the government to take the necessary action to address the issue of overcrowding. [16]Similar provisions exist in international agreements like the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which emphasizes the significance of offering young offenders adequate and suitable housing[17].

4.2 Inadequate Staffing and Training

Understaffing and inadequate staff training are frequent problems at observation homes. Low staff-to-youth ratios can make it difficult to give each child the individualized attention, care, and supervision they need for effective rehabilitation. Inadequate training in child psychology, counselling techniques, and child rights further compromises the quality of the guidance and support provided to the youth.

The National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has emphasized the necessity of adequate staffing and training in observation homes and has recommended routine training programmes for the staff to improve their skills and comprehension of juvenile psychology and rehabilitation strategies[18].Young offenders need a supportive environment for their growth and rehabilitation, which can only be accomplished with properly trained and motivated staff.

4.3 Lack of Specialized Programs and Services

Observation homes frequently struggle to offer specialized services and programmes that cater to the various needs of young offenders. For a juvenile’s holistic development and a successful reintegration, programmes like vocational training, skill development, educational support, mental health counselling, and substance abuse rehabilitation are crucial.

In order to meet the specific needs of young offenders, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules, 2016, emphasize the necessity of offering specialized programmes and services in observation home[19]s. However, the accessibility and efficacy of such programmes are frequently constrained by a lack of funding, resources, and qualified personnel.

4.4 Legal and Procedural Challenges

Observation homes also encounter procedural and legal difficulties that affect how well they operate. The prompt and effective resolution of cases and the provision of suitable remedial actions can be hampered by delays in the judicial process, inconsistent interpretation and application of the law, and procedural complexities. Legal obstacles that make it difficult to obtain the clearances, grants, or permissions required for the implementation of programmes and services can also be problematic.

Through legal reforms, attempts have been made to address these difficulties. In India, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, put in place measures to speed up the adjudication process and guarantee that cases involving juvenile offenders are resolved promptly. However, ongoing efforts are needed to make the legal system stronger and address the unique difficulties observation homes face.

V. Case Studies and Best Practices

It is important to examine innovative approaches, analyse successful models, and draw lessons that can be applied to other observation homes in order to gain insights into effective approaches. This section examines international case studies and best practises that have produced successful results in the rehabilitation of young offenders.

5.1 Analysis of Successful Models

Programs and strategies that support the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders have been successfully implemented by a number of observation homes. These models place a strong emphasis on a multifaceted strategy that takes into account many facets of a young person’s life, such as education, skill development, mental health, and social integration.

In India’s capital city of Delhi, the “Bal Raksha” programme is one such effective model. The program’s main goal is to offer juvenile offenders all the support they need, including assistance with their studies, job training, counselling, and efforts to reunite them with their families. The Bal Raksha programme has made progress towards lowering recidivism rates and assisting young people in their reintegration back into society[20].

The Scandinavian juvenile justice system has gained a reputation for successfully rehabilitating young offenders on a global scale. In countries like Norway, Sweden, and Finland, the principles of restorative justice are prioritized, highlighting the importance of rehabilitation, education, and skill development. To create a supportive and nurturing environment for young offenders, these nations have implemented community-based programmes, therapeutic interventions, and family involvement, which has resulted in low recidivism rates[21].

5.2 Analysis of Innovative Methods

Innovation is essential for enhancing the efficiency of observation homes and fostering successful outcomes for young offenders. To address particular difficulties and strengthen the rehabilitation process, a number of cutting-edge strategies have been put into practise.

Utilizing art therapy in observation homes is one creative strategy. Juveniles can express themselves, work through their emotions, and develop coping skills through art therapy. According to research, art therapy helps young offenders develop better social skills, lessen aggression, and improve their emotional well-being[22].

Implementing restorative justice principles in observation homes is another cutting-edge strategy. The goals of restorative justice are to make amends for the harm an offence has caused and to encourage communication between the offender, victim, and community. This method increases the likelihood of successful rehabilitation and reintegration by assisting young people in understanding the consequences of their behaviour, growing in empathy, and accepting responsibility for it[23].

5.3 Potential Replication

Analysis of innovative ideas and successful models tells vital insights that can be applied to other observation homes. A few valuable points are:

1. Individualized Approach: Individualizing rehabilitation programmes to the specific needs and circumstances of each juvenile offender.

2. Collaborative Partnerships: Forming alliances with educational institutions, career centres, mental health specialists, and neighbourhood organizations to offer a thorough support system.

3. Family and Community Involvement: To ensure a smooth reintegration into society, families should be involved in the rehabilitation process, and community support systems should be strengthened.

4. Continuous Evaluation and Improvement: Monitoring programme and intervention effectiveness on a regular basis, incorporating stakeholder feedback, and making necessary corrections for continuous improvement.

Replicating effective models and a commitment to prioritizing the rehabilitation and reintegration of juvenile offenders requires a supportive legal and policy environment, ample funding, and innovative approaches. Observation homes can improve their procedures and help the young people in their care have better outcomes by taking what they’ve learned from these experiences.

VI Improving Observation Homes

Juvenile offenders’ rehabilitation and reintegration into society are greatly aided by observation homes. To guarantee the effectiveness of these facilities, a number of areas need attention and improvement. This section focuses on the important issues that must be resolved in order to improve the operation of observation homes and foster successful outcomes for young offenders.

6.1 Improving Facilities and Infrastructure

The inadequate infrastructure and facilities are one of the major issues observation homes deal with. The rehabilitation process can be hampered by overcrowding, inadequate living conditions, and poor amenities. To give the young people living in observation homes a safe, secure, and supportive environment, it is crucial to give infrastructure and facility improvements top priority.

Sampurna Behura v. The Supreme Court of India emphasized the value of providing adequate infrastructure and facilities in observation homes in the case Union of India (2019). To ensure the juveniles’ overall development, the court ruled that observation homes needed to have enough room, proper sanitation facilities, educational amenities, recreational areas, and vocational training facilities[24].

It is important to make an effort to set aside enough money for the building, remodeling, and upkeep of observation homes. The infrastructure should be planned to meet the unique requirements of young people, guaranteeing age-appropriate living quarters and recreational spaces. To ensure the safety of the juveniles, the facilities must also adhere to the rules established by pertinent laws and international standards[25].

6.2 Improving Training and Staffing

The effective operation of observation homes depends on the presence of motivated and well-trained staff. Staff members should be sensitive to the special needs of juvenile offenders and have the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities. To ensure that the juveniles are properly supervised, cared for, and guided, adequate staffing levels should be maintained.

The Supreme Court emphasized the need for comprehensive police reforms, including the hiring and training of police officers, in the case of Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006). Although the case primarily involved the police, it emphasizes the significance of providing adequate training and opportunities for professional growth for staff members working in observation homes[26]

The staff of observation homes should receive training in areas like child psychology, rehabilitation methods, conflict resolution, and effective communication. To develop the staff’s skills and keep them current with juvenile justice practices, periodic capacity-building workshops and refresher courses should be held[27]

6.3 Ensuring Access to Education and Skill Development

For juvenile offenders to be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society, education and skill development are essential. The provision of access to high-quality education that satisfies the particular needs of the juveniles should be a top priority for observation homes. Educational plans should be made to fill in any learning gaps and give students the fundamental information and abilities they need.

The Supreme Court of India recognised education as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution in Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1992). To ensure all children’s holistic development, the court emphasized the necessity of providing free and required education to all children, including juvenile offenders[28]

Additionally, programmes for vocational training should be made available to improve the employability of young people after their release. Juveniles can gain confidence and improve their chances of finding employment by learning practical skills like carpentry, plumbing, or computer literacy, which lowers the likelihood of recidivism.

To ensure that observation homes have a thorough educational and skill development curriculum, efforts should be made to collaborate with educational institutions and vocational training centres. The chances of a successful reintegration into society can be improved by this collaboration by giving access to qualified teachers, specialized courses, and certification programs[29]

6.4 Addressing Mental Health and Rehabilitation Needs

Many young offenders have difficult home lives and may need specialized mental health care and rehabilitation services. Juveniles’ mental health should be given top priority in observation homes, and they should have access to programmes for therapy, counselling, and rehabilitation.

The Madras High Court emphasized the need for observation homes to offer psychological counselling and therapy to address the mental health needs of juveniles in the case of M. Selvam v. State of Tamil Nadu (2018)[30]

In order to establish thorough mental health and rehabilitation programmes within observation homes, efforts should be made to collaborate with mental health professionals and organizations. To meet each juvenile’s unique needs, regular assessments, customized treatment plans, and follow-up support should be offered. Campaigns to raise awareness about mental health and wellbeing can also be run. Within observation homes, lessen stigma and foster a supportive atmosphere[31]

6.5 Promoting Community Engagement and Collaboration

Collaboration and community involvement are essential for the successful reintegration of young offenders. Observation homes should actively engage the neighbourhood in the rehabilitation process by creating a welcoming atmosphere that promotes the inclusion of young offenders.

The Supreme Court emphasized the value of community involvement in the justice system in the case of Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989). To ensure effective rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders, the court emphasized the need for coordination between the police, social welfare organizations, NGOs, and other stakeholder.[32]

To provide juveniles with opportunities for vocational training, internships, and job placements, observation homes should form partnerships with regional community organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), educational institutions, and employers. By providing a network of support, easing their reintegration into society, and lowering the likelihood of reoffending, these partnerships can benefit the young people[33].

Therefore, addressing issues with infrastructure, staffing, specialized programmes, and legal procedures is necessary for improving observation homes. Observation homes can offer a supportive environment for the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders by improving these factors. To improve outcomes for young offenders, efforts should be made to strengthen the legal system, ensure adherence to international standards, and foster cooperation between stakeholders.

VII Policy and Legal Reforms

Observation homes operate in accordance with a larger set of laws and regulations governing juvenile justice. It is essential to continuously review and amend current laws and regulations in order to guarantee the efficient operation of observation homes and promote the rights and welfare of juvenile offenders. In the context of observation homes, this section examines important areas for legislative and policy changes.

7.1 Review of Existing Laws and Guidelines

To find gaps, inconsistencies, and areas that require improvement, a thorough analysis of the current regulations and laws governing juvenile detention facilities and observation homes is imperative. To ensure compliance with best practises and the protection of juvenile rights, this review should take into account international conventions, constitutional clauses, pertinent statutes, and case laws.

7.2 Proposals for Legislative Reforms

To fill in any gaps and enhance the operation of observation homes, proposals for legislative reforms can be developed based on an analysis of the current laws and regulations. To strengthen the provisions relating to observation homes, these reforms may entail amending pertinent laws, such as the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

Clearer guidelines for infrastructure and facilities, standards for staffing and training, approaches to addressing overcrowding, provisions for specialized programmes and services, and the incorporation of international standards are some examples of the proposed reforms.

7.3 Strengthening Accountability and Monitoring Mechanisms

Within observation homes, accountability and monitoring mechanisms are essential for ensuring that policies are implemented correctly and that legal requirements are followed. To encourage transparency, stop abuse, and address any violations of juvenile rights, these mechanisms must be strengthened.

Regular inspections, evaluations, and reporting on the conditions and procedures in observation homes can be made easier with the establishment of an independent monitoring body, as recommended by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This can improve accountability and result in quick corrections when necessary.

A thorough examination of global practises and accountability mechanisms in juvenile justice systems can be found in literature like Franklin E. Zimring’s “Juvenile Justice in Global Perspective[34]“

Technology can also be used to monitor and track the development of young offenders and the operation of observation homes. An example of this would be electronic monitoring systems. These systems can deliver data in real-time and allow for prompt interventions.

To sum up, policy and legal reforms are required to address flaws in the current system for regulating observation homes. The efficient operation of observation homes and the protection of the rights and welfare of young offenders can be achieved through regular reviews, suggestions for legislative changes, and the strengthening of accountability and monitoring mechanisms.

VIII Conclusion

In conclusion, several important findings are highlighted by the analysis of observation homes within the framework of the juvenile justice system. The functions, difficulties, and potential advancements of observation homes have been clarified in this paper. The key findings are summed up in the following sentences:

Observation homes are essential to the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders because they give them a secure setting. Observation homes, however, face a number of difficulties, including crowding, insufficient staffing and training, a dearth of specialized services and programmes, as well as logistical and legal barriers.
In observation homes, effective models and cutting-edge methods have shown promising results in terms of rehabilitation and reintegration.
Infrastructure and facilities can be improved, staffing and training can be strengthened, access to education and skill development can be ensured, and mental health and rehabilitation needs can be addressed.
Reforms to the law and policy are necessary to fill in the gaps in the current system. It is advised that current laws and regulations be reviewed, legislative reforms be proposed, and strong accountability and oversight systems be put in place.

8.2: A Reformation Call to Action

The findings make it clear that immediate action is required to improve the juvenile justice system and reform observation homes. Included in the call to action are:

Appropriate funding and resource allocation are needed to improve observation homes’ infrastructure, facilities, and services.
Strengthening training and staffing initiatives to ensure that there is a trained workforce that can effectively care for and support young offenders
ensuring that juvenile offenders have access to high-quality education and skill-development programmes inside observation homes to aid in their rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
Providing specialized programmes and services, such as counselling and therapy, to meet the mental health needs of young offenders
Promoting cooperation and community involvement to create a welcoming environment for the successful reintegration of young offenders

8.3 Recommendations and Future Directions

The following suggestions are put forth to advance the fields of observation homes and juvenile justice:

Carry out studies and assessments to evaluate the success of reforms implemented in observation homes and pinpoint areas for improvement.
Create uniform policies and recommendations for observation homes while taking into account relevant legal precedents, constitutional clauses, and international agreements.
Encourage collaboration and knowledge-sharing among stakeholders, including government organizations, non-governmental organizations, and specialists, in order to share experiences and take inspiration from effective models.
Priorities the rights and welfare of young offenders above all other considerations in the juvenile justice system, ensuring a child-centric strategy and encouraging their rehabilitation and reintegration.

By putting these suggestions into practise, policymakers, practitioners, and advocates can collaborate to develop a more inclusive and efficient juvenile justice system that protects the rights and general welfare of young offenders and paves the way for their successful reintegration back into society as law-abiding members of society.

References

Singh, M. P. (2016). Juvenile Justice System: Law and Practice. Thomson Reuters.
Kumari, V. (2006). Juvenile Justice System in India: From Welfare to Rights. Oxford University Press.
Ghatate, N. M. (2017). Juvenile Justice Administration: A Study of Practices and Procedures. Satyam Law International.
Zimring, F. E. (2010). Juvenile Justice in Global Perspective. SAGE Publications.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015,
M. Selvam v. State of Tamil Nadu, W.P.(MD) No. 9147 of 2018.
Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, AIR 1989 SC 2039.
Prakash Singh v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 310 of 1996.
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1992 SC 1858.
Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1187 of 2018.
Roberts, A. R. (2017). Juvenile Justice: Policies, Programs, and Practices.
Champion, D. J. (2010). The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law.
Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, (2018) 8 SCC 443
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC)
National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), Guidelines for Staffing Pattern and Norms for Services in Children’s Homes and Other Institutions, 2016
Prayas, Bal Raksha – Delhi
Liefaard, T., & Doek, J. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights of Children.
Malchiodi, C. A. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of Art Therapy.
McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2003). Restorative justice practice: An overview. Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, 29-54.
Model Guidelines for Homes under the Juvenile Justice Act, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India
Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra [AIR 1983 SC 378
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S. Nayak [AIR 1992 SC 1701]
State of Tamil Nadu v. Ravi [AIR 2005 SC 3836]

[1] State of Tamil Nadu v. Ravi [AIR 2005 SC 3836]

[2]Section 2 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

[3] Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 82, 83, and 363-A

[4] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Section 6

[5] Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra [AIR 1983 SC 378]

[6] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000

[7] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

[8] Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S. Nayak [AIR 1992 SC 1701]

[9] Section 19, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

[10] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

[11] Model Guidelines for Homes under the Juvenile Justice Act, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India

[12] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 20

[13] Roberts, A. R. (2017). Juvenile Justice: Policies, Programs, and Practices.

[14]Champion, D. J. (2010). The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law.

[15] Champion, D. J. (2010). The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law.

[16] Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, (2018) 8 SCC 443

[17] United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC)

[18] National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), Guidelines for Staffing Pattern and Norms for Services in Children’s Homes and Other Institutions, 2016

[19] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules, 2016

[20] Prayas, Bal Raksha – Delhi

[21] Liefaard, T., & Doek, J. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights of Children.

[22] Malchiodi, C. A. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of Art Therapy.

[23] McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2003). Restorative justice practice: An overview. Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, 29-54.

[24] Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1187 of 2018.

[25] The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 41.

[26] Prakash Singh v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 310 of 1996.

[27] The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 46

[28] Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1992 SC 1858.

[29] The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 45.

[30] M. Selvam v. State of Tamil Nadu, W.P.(MD) No. 9147 of 2018.