ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TREATIES

This article is written by Satirtha Basak of Faculty of Law, Delhi University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya

Abstract

Global environmental treaties are vital in tackling worldwide ecological challenges. They set common goals and legal guidelines to protect our natural world. Their success depends on strong enforcement measures. Tools such as compliance committees, dispute resolution, trade restrictions, financial incentives, and reporting are essential. Yet national sovereignty, voluntary commitments, limited enforcement power, and political or economic pressures often undermine compliance. Examples clearly show both achievements and failures. The Montreal Protocol and MARPOL 73/78 prove that enforcement drives environmental progress. Conversely, the Paris Agreement and Basel Convention struggle with compliance due to weak binding rules. Enhancing enforcement is crucial for boosting treaty effectiveness. This improvement can come from legal reforms, market incentives, and technical and financial aid for developing countries globally. Non-state actors like NGOs, media, and private companies are crucial in monitoring and advocating for compliance. Their work exposes serious shortcomings and encourages accountability. Looking ahead, the global community must invest in stronger enforcement, better international cooperation, and fair resource sharing. Enhanced mechanisms will ensure that environmental treaties fully reach their goals and ultimately create a more sustainable, resilient future.

Keywords

Compliance, enforcement, treaties, sustainability, governance, accountability, and regulation.

Introduction

International environmental treaties are official agreements between countries designed to tackle global environmental issues. These challenges go beyond the borders of individual nations and require collective action. Many of these treaties are legally binding, ensuring that participating nations follow set regulations. They address critical concerns like climate change, loss of biodiversity, and controlling pollution. By setting shared objectives, these agreements help nations work towards a common environmental vision. They also establish global standards, making it easier to coordinate efforts for protecting the planet.[1] The success of these treaties heavily relies on how strong their enforcement systems are. If the enforcement is weak, even the best-designed agreements may not deliver the expected results. When there are no strict consequences, countries might ignore their commitments without any real accountability. That’s why improving enforcement strategies is essential for making global environmental policies more effective.[2] This article focuses on the different enforcement methods used in international environmental treaties. It will assess how effective these mechanisms are in ensuring compliance. By looking at real-world examples, we will highlight successful strategies that have worked in the past. Additionally, we will suggest ways to improve enforcement in future environmental agreements.

The Need for Enforcement Mechanisms

1. Challenges in Achieving Compliance Due to State Sovereignty: Every country has the right to govern itself without outside influence. While this independence is essential in global politics, it creates obstacles in enforcing environmental agreements. Nations often place their own interests above international commitments, which can result in partial or complete non-compliance. The lack of a global authority to enforce these treaties makes the situation worse, as international laws mainly depend on voluntary participation and self-monitoring.[3]
2. Examples of Environmental Issues Exacerbated by Non-Compliance: Ignoring environmental agreements has intensified many ecological challenges. Failure to follow these treaties has led to severe consequences for the planet. Some nations have not met their emission reduction targets, even under agreements like the Kyoto Protocol. This has accelerated global warming and made it harder to control rising temperatures. The Convention on Biological Diversity was created to protect ecosystems and species. However, habitat destruction and extinction rates remain high due to weak conservation efforts by many countries. Agreements like the Basel Convention regulate hazardous waste movement across borders. Despite this, illegal dumping and poor enforcement have caused serious environmental damage, especially in developing nations.[4]
3. The Role of Enforcement in Maintaining the Integrity and Objectives of Environmental Treaties: Strong enforcement systems are essential for making international environmental treaties successful. They help ensure that all participating nations follow their agreed commitments, keeping the agreements effective. Different methods are used to enforce these treaties, such as regular monitoring, compliance committees, and dispute resolution mechanisms. A well-structured enforcement process not only discourages rule-breaking but also builds trust, encouraging more countries to actively participate in environmental efforts.[5]

Types of Enforcement Mechanisms

International environmental treaties employ a variety of enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance and achieve their objectives. These mechanisms range from compliance committees and dispute resolution procedures to trade measures, financial incentives, and rigorous reporting requirements.

Compliance Committees: Many international environmental agreements set up compliance committees to oversee and support treaty enforcement. These committees help ensure that countries fulfil their obligations under the agreement. They usually consist of representatives from member nations who assess compliance and offer guidance. Their work includes reviewing reports, investigating issues, and engaging with non-compliant countries to promote adherence.[6]

Case Study: Compliance System of the Kyoto Protocol: The Kyoto Protocol has a structured compliance system managed by a dedicated committee. This committee is divided into two separate branches to handle different aspects of enforcement. The Facilitative Branch focuses on guiding and assisting countries to help them meet their commitments. Meanwhile, the Enforcement Branch has the power to impose penalties on nations that fail to reduce emissions as required. This dual approach ensures both support and accountability in the treaty’s implementation.

Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Multilateral environmental agreements include specific processes to handle conflicts between countries. These mechanisms help resolve disagreements over how treaty rules are interpreted or applied. Various approaches are used, such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration. These methods provide peaceful solutions to disputes while ensuring the treaty remains effective and respected.[7]

Case Study: How the International Court of Justice Handles Environmental Disputes: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) plays a key role in settling conflicts between countries, including those related to environmental concerns. It serves as the primary legal body for resolving such disputes at the international level.A notable example is the Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project case between Hungary and Slovakia. The ICJ was involved in deciding issues related to a dam project that had major environmental impacts, demonstrating its role in interpreting and applying international environmental laws.

Trade Restrictions and Sanctions in Environmental Agreements: Some environmental treaties use trade restrictions and sanctions to ensure compliance. These measures limit or ban trade in specific goods, discouraging violations and promoting adherence to treaty rules.

Case Study: CITES and Trade Sanctions for Wildlife Protection: The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) enforces compliance through trade bans. Countries that fail to follow its regulations may face restrictions on trading certain wildlife species. This strategy has proven effective in pushing nations to improve their conservation efforts and comply with the treaty’s guidelines.

Financial Mechanisms: Many environmental treaties use financial measures to ensure nations follow their commitments. These may include providing funds for capacity-building, technology support, or imposing fines on those who fail to comply.[8]

Case Study: The Montreal Protocol’s Multilateral Fund: The Montreal Protocol created the Multilateral Fund to help developing countries phase out ozone-depleting substances. This fund offers both financial and technical assistance, making it easier for these nations to implement the treaty. As a result, compliance rates have been high, leading to a significant reduction in harmful emissions worldwide.

Requirement for Countries to Report Their Environmental Efforts: Many international environmental agreements require nations to submit regular reports on their progress. These reports help evaluate compliance, identify difficulties, and promote transparency among participating countries.[9]

Case Study: Reporting System in the Paris Agreement: Under the Paris Agreement, countries must submit Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), detailing their climate commitments. They also provide biennial transparency reports, which help track global progress and encourage stronger climate actions over time.

Challenges in Enforcement

1. Challenges Due to National Sovereignty and Conflicting Interests: Every country has the right to make its own decisions without outside interference. This independence can create challenges when global environmental commitments seem to conflict with national priorities. Nations often place economic growth and domestic policies above environmental responsibilities, leading to selective compliance or outright non-adherence. The lack of a global authority to enforce these agreements makes the situation more complex, as international laws mainly depend on voluntary cooperation.[10]
2. Weak Enforcement and Voluntary Commitment in Environmental Agreements: Many global environmental treaties are not legally binding or have weak enforcement measures. As a result, their success often depends on the willingness of countries to comply.Since participation is voluntary, nations can withdraw from commitments or fail to implement agreed actions without facing major penalties. For example, the Paris Agreement allows countries to set their own climate goals, leading to different levels of commitment and effort among participants.[11]
3. Challenges Faced by Developing Countries in Environmental Compliance: Many developing nations lack the necessary resources to fully implement and enforce environmental agreements. Financial limitations, insufficient technical expertise, and weak institutions often make compliance difficult. These countries may struggle with monitoring environmental changes, enforcing laws, or adopting sustainable technologies. Additionally, pressing socio-economic issues often take priority, making long-term environmental commitments harder to fulfil.[12]
4. Political and Economic Factors Affecting Environmental Enforcement: Government decisions on enforcing environmental agreements are often influenced by political and economic pressures. Powerful industries and interest groups may resist strict regulations if they believe it could hurt their financial interests. For example, countries that rely on fossil fuels may hesitate to adopt policies that could weaken their energy sector. Additionally, in an effort to stay competitive globally, some nations may lower environmental standards to attract investments, leading to a decline in overall environmental protections.[13]

Case Studies

Success Stories

The Montreal Protocol: Strong Enforcement Driving Ozone Recovery: The Montreal Protocol, adopted in 1987, is considered one of the most successful global environmental treaties. It required countries to phase out harmful ozone-depleting substances like chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) to protect the atmosphere. With strict enforcement and support from all nations, the treaty has significantly reduced these harmful chemicals in the air. As a result, the ozone layer is gradually healing and is expected to return to 1980 levels by 2066 over Antarctica, 2045 over the Arctic, and 2040 in other regions.[14]

MARPOL 73/78: Strengthening Rules to Prevent Marine Pollution: The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73/78) is a key global treaty aimed at reducing marine pollution caused by ships. It addresses pollution from both routine operations and accidental spills. Implemented by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), MARPOL has strict regulations covering pollutants like oil, chemicals, and sewage. Its success is due to strong enforcement measures, including regular ship inspections, mandatory certifications, and penalties for non-compliance.[15]

Enforcement Challenges

The Paris Agreement: Navigating National Interests and Global Ambitions: The Paris Agreement, established in 2015, is designed to limit the increase in global temperatures. It does so by prompting nations to develop their own climate action plans known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). This approach is based on voluntary commitments rather than legally binding targets. As a result, countries set their own goals, which can vary widely and often reflect national priorities over collective global interests. The absence of strict enforcement measures makes it challenging to hold nations accountable. This shortfall poses significant obstacles to fully realizing the objectives of the Agreement.[16]

The Basel Convention: Difficulties in Regulating Hazardous Waste Movement: The Basel Convention was created to manage the international movement of dangerous wastes. It also sets out rules for their proper disposal. Even with its detailed guidelines, enforcement issues continue to arise. These problems are especially prominent when trying to stop illegal waste shipments to nations without adequate waste management systems. Differences in how effectively countries enforce these rules add to the problem. Additionally, financial incentives for improper disposal further weaken the Convention’s overall impact. These issues underscore the need for stricter enforcement measures. They also highlight the importance of global collaboration to ensure nations comply with the rules.[17]

The Role of Non-State Actors

1. Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Monitoring and Advocacy: NGOs play a vital role in overseeing the implementation of environmental treaties. They actively push for the development of stricter environmental policies. These organizations often act as independent monitors. They ensure that both governments and corporations are held responsible for environmental damage. For example, NGOs have been crucial in investigating instances of environmental wrongdoing. They provide key evidence to law enforcement agencies, helping to secure prosecutions in specific cases.[18] NGOs also play a key role in ensuring that the public can participate in environmental decision-making. They help create channels for ordinary citizens to contribute to these discussions. The Aarhus Convention serves as a prime example of this approach. It grants people rights to access environmental information, participate in related processes, and seek legal remedies, with NGOs being vital to its creation and execution.[19]
2. The Impact of Public Opinion and Media in Enforcing Compliance: Media coverage plays a major role in shaping public opinion. This influence drives environmental governance by urging policymakers and corporations to pursue more sustainable practices. Heightened media attention brings environmental concerns into sharper focus. This increased visibility boosts public engagement and amplifies the demand for action. Research shows that when the public voices their concerns through social media, firms are more likely to reduce environmental violations. This demonstrates the significant impact that active public engagement can have on enforcing compliance.[20] Media attention during major events like the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) has a noticeable impact on public opinion. It often shifts how people view environmental issues. This change in perception boosts public engagement and emphasizes the media’s crucial role in driving environmental discussions.[21]
3. Private Sector Involvement and Corporate Accountability in Environmental Oversight: The private sector plays a key role in shaping environmental oversight. It achieves this by embracing sustainable practices and engaging in self-regulatory initiatives. Companies frequently design internal policies that surpass legal standards. This proactive approach helps reduce their overall environmental impact. Such self-governance is becoming increasingly central to modern environmental management. It now forms a crucial part of how environmental issues are addressed. Moreover, businesses sometimes team up with NGOs and government agencies. These collaborations are geared toward creating and enforcing environmental standards. By working together, these groups not only demonstrate corporate accountability. They also contribute to broader environmental goals through innovative solutions and the adoption of industry best practices.[22]

Enhancing Enforcement Mechanisms

Strengthening current enforcement systems requires the introduction of more effective compliance measures in treaties. Establishing such robust mechanisms is essential for ensuring that all obligations are met. One strategy involves setting up impartial monitoring organizations capable of conducting independent investigations. These bodies would collect data from sources beyond the self-reported information provided by member states. For example, the U.S. Government Accountability Office recommends that treaty secretariats undertake independent fact-finding to complement national reports. Additionally, enabling non-governmental organizations to offer their insights is viewed as a valuable way to enhance overall monitoring efforts[23] Explicit, enforceable commitments with predetermined penalties can discourage breaches and encourage adherence. This clarity helps ensure that parties take their obligations seriously. Creating dedicated compliance committees with the power to suggest or enforce sanctions serves as an additional deterrent. Such committees play a crucial role in holding parties accountable. For example, several international treaties have set up internal non-compliance bodies. These entities help drive implementation and ensure that all parties meet their responsibilities.[24]

Integrating Market-Based Mechanisms and Incentives: Market-based approaches provide adaptable and economical ways to meet environmental targets. They work by creating financial incentives that encourage businesses to voluntarily lessen their environmental impact. For example, the Paris Agreement includes a mechanism aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions while also fostering sustainable development. It sets up a framework that supports non-market strategies for achieving sustainability. Implementing these mechanisms requires careful planning to safeguard environmental integrity. This design must prevent issues like firms buying credits without actually lowering emissions. Consequently, strong monitoring and verification systems are vital. They ensure that market-based strategies deliver real environmental benefits.[25]

The Importance of Capacity-Building and Technical Assistance for Developing Nations: Many developing nations struggle to implement and enforce environmental treaties because they lack adequate resources and technical know-how. Providing capacity-building support and technical assistance is crucial for these countries to effectively meet their obligations. For instance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency runs programs that help developing nations join global environmental treaties and build the necessary compliance infrastructure. This assistance can involve training in environmental monitoring, establishing legal and institutional frameworks, and offering financial support for sustainable practices. By boosting the capabilities of these countries, the international community can achieve more consistent compliance. This, in turn, helps address global environmental challenges more efficiently.[26]

Conclusion

Global environmental treaties are essential for tackling worldwide ecological challenges. Their success, however, relies on having strong enforcement measures. A range of enforcement tools are used to ensure that nations follow their commitments. These include compliance committees, dispute resolution processes, trade restrictions, financial incentives, and reporting requirements. Yet, obstacles such as national sovereignty, the voluntary nature of many agreements, limited resources in developing countries, and political and economic pressures often get in the way. These challenges make it harder to implement treaties effectively. Examples like the Montreal Protocol and MARPOL 73/78 show that strong enforcement can lead to significant environmental improvements. In contrast, the Paris Agreement and Basel Convention illustrate the difficulties in maintaining compliance on a global scale. A robust enforcement system is vital for the effectiveness of international environmental agreements. Without it, these treaties would struggle to achieve their intended goals. Enhancing treaty performance can be achieved by strengthening current compliance structures, adding market-driven incentives, and providing technical and financial support to developing nations. These measures help to overcome enforcement challenges. Moreover, non-governmental organizations, media outlets, and private companies play an important role in ensuring accountability. Their involvement boosts transparency in environmental governance. It is crucial for the global community to take decisive action to strengthen compliance and enforcement efforts. Such action is necessary to improve the overall impact of environmental treaties. Countries need to commit to more binding enforcement measures, enhance international cooperation, and dedicate the necessary resources to meet treaty objectives. This level of commitment is vital for successful implementation. By reinforcing enforcement mechanisms, the international community can make significant progress toward a more sustainable and resilient future. This approach is key to securing a better environmental legacy for all.

---

[1] Introduction to environmental governance – global pact, https://globalpact.informea.org/sites/default/files/documents/International%20Environmental%20Governance.pdf (last visited Jan 30, 2025).

[2] Andrew  Watson Samaan, Enforcement of international environmental treaties (2011), https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1352&context=elr (last visited Jan 30, 2025).

[3] Mohamad Albakjaji & Jinane El Baroudy, The effectiveness of the International Environmental Law: The issues of state sovereignty, national interests, and differing levels of commitments Journal of Eco humanism (2024), https://ecohumanism.co.uk/joe/ecohumanism/article/view/4297 (last visited Jan 30, 2025).

[4] David Hunter, International Environmental Law www.americanbar.org (2021), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/publications/insights-on-law-and-society/volume-19/insights-vol–19—issue-1/international-environmental-law/ (last visited Jan 30, 2025).

[5] Andrew  Watson Samaan, Enforcement of international environmental treaties (2011), https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1352&context=elr (last visited Jan 30, 2025).

[6] G. L. Rose, Report on the comparative analysis of compliance … assets. ippc.int (2006), https://assets.ippc.int/static/media/files/publications/en/1182329967938_Comp_analysis_of_compliance_mech.pdf (last visited Jan 30, 2025).

[7] Lclark, https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/2830-climate-change-tm-chapter-16 (last visited Jan 31, 2025).

[8] Glenn  M Wiser, Compliance survey paper – center for international environmental law www.ciel.org (1999), https://www.ciel.org/Publications/SurveyPaper1.pdf (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[9] G.  L. Rose, Report on the comparative analysis of compliance … assets. ippc.int (2006), https://assets.ippc.int/static/media/files/publications/en/1182329967938_Comp_analysis_of_compliance_mech.pdf (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[10] Andrew  Watson Samaan, Enforcement of international environmental treaties ir.lawnet.fordham.edu (2011), https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1352&context=elr (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[11] Mary E. O’Connell, Enforcement and the Success of International Environmental Law, 3 Ind. J. Glob. Legal Stud. 47 (1995). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/578

[12] Per-Olof Busch, What are the challenges of international environmental negotiations? ’: Switch-Asia SWITCH, https://www.switch-asia.eu/news/what-are-the-challenges-of-international-environmental-negotiations/ (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[13] Arik Levinson & Derek Kellenberg, Waste of effort? International Environmental Agreements | CEPR cepr.org (2014), https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/waste-effort-international-environmental-agreements (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[14] Ozone layer recovery is on track, helping avoid global warming by 0.5°C, UN Environment (2023), https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/ozone-layer-recovery-track-helping-avoid-global-warming-05degc (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[15] International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships (MARPOL), International Maritime Organization, https://www.imo.org/en/about/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollution-from-Ships-%28MARPOL%29.aspx (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[16] Kathryn Tso & Michael Mehling, How are countries held accountable under the Paris Agreement? MIT Climate Portal (2021), https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-are-countries-held-accountable-under-paris-agreement (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[17] Practical experiences with the Basel Convention, prevent-waste.net, https://prevent-waste.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/PREVENT-StEP_Practical_Experiences_Basel-Convention_discussion-paper-2022.pdf (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[18] https://efface.eu/ngos-and-networks-relevant-fighting-environmental-crime/index.html

[19] Carolyn Abbot, Maria Lee, NGOs Shaping Public Participation Through Law: The Aarhus Convention and Legal Mobilisation, Journal of Environmental Law, Volume 36, Issue 1, March 2024, Pages 85–106, https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad030

[20] Bing Zhang et al., How citizen participation affects environmental governance: Evidence from Social Media in China | CEPR cepr.org (2022), https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/how-citizen-participation-affects-environmental-governance-evidence-social-media (last visited Feb 1, 2025).

[21] Wonneberger A, Meijers MHC, Schuck ART. Shifting public engagement: How media coverage of climate change conferences affects climate change audience segments. Public Underst Sci. 2020 Feb;29(2):176-193. doi: 10.1177/0963662519886474. Epub 2019 Nov 11. PMID: 31709905; PMCID: PMC7323770.

[22] Michael P. Vandenbergh, Private Environmental Governance, 99 Cornell L. Rev. 129 (2013) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol99/iss1/3

[23] International Environment: Strengthening the Implementation of Environmental Agreements

RCED-92-188Published: Aug 24, 1992. Publicly Released: Aug 24, 1992. https://www.gao.gov/products/rced-92-188

[24] Generating Compliance with Multilateral Treaties: What are the Best Mechanisms? By Caroline Foster Christina Voigt December 17, 2024 https://multilateralism.sipa.columbia.edu/news/generating-compliance-multilateral-treaties-what-are-best-mechanisms

[25] Key aspects of the Paris Agreement https://unfccc.int/most-requested/key-aspects-of-the-paris-agreement

[26] Best Practices for EPA’s International Capacity-Building Programs: Report of EPA Task Force 1999 https://nepis.epa.gov/

Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or the materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is personal.