CITATION (2000) 4 SCC 75 Date March 30, 2000 Plaintiff/petitioner/appellant State of Karnataka Defendant /Respondent Krishnappa Name of Court Supreme Court of India Judges A . A.S., R Lahoti, S Variava & A.S. Anand, C.J INTRODUCTION Sexual violence apart from being a dehumanising act, is an unlawful intrusion of the right Read more…
CITATION ANUJ GARG & Ors. v. HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & Ors., (2008) 3 SCC 1. DATE 06th DECEMBER, 2007 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER JUSTICE S. B. SINHA H. S. BEDI DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & Ors. (RESPONDENT) JUDGES JUSTICE S. B. SINHAJUSTICE H. S. BEDI INTRODUCTION Read more…
CITATION (1997) 4 SCC 306 YEAR OF JUDGEMENT 18TH DECEMBER 1997 PLAINTIFF VINEET NARAIN & OTHERS RESPONDENT UNION OF INDIA BENCH JUSTICE S.P BHARUCHA, JUSTICE S.C SEN AND JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE INTRODUCTION- Vineet Narain vs Union of India, popularly known as the Jain Hawala case is considered as a Read more…
This article is written by Dolly Jeswani, of Nari Gursahani Law College an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT Adultery, though a legal issue, is deeply personal and emotional. It reflects the pain and complexity of human relationships. In Indian culture, the topic of adultery was traditionally taboo and rarely discussed, Read more…
CITATION MANU/UP/0667/1923, 83 Ind. Cas. 904 DATE 17.09.1923 COURT NAME Allahabad High Court, British India PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER The Crown (Emperor) DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. Wali Muhammad JUDGES Hon’ble Justice Shah Mohammad Sulaiman INTRODUCTION The case of Emperor v. Wali Mohammed is a landmark judgment in criminal procedural law, particularly addressing the admissibility of additional Read more…
Citation (2014) 8 SCC 273 Date 2nd July 2014 Plaintiff/petitioner/appellant Arnesh Kumar Defendant/Respondent State of Bihar Name of Court Supreme Court of India Judges Chandramauli K.R. Prasad and Pinaki Chandra Ghose, JJ INTRODUCTION The Principle of “innocent until proven guilty” remains a fundamental principle internationally recognize to safeguard the right Read more…
CITATION AIR 2008 SC 2392 YEAR OF JUDGMENT 2008 PLAINTIFF Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel RESONDENT State of Gujarat and Ors. STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE Code of Criminal Procedure BENCH Lokeshwar Singh Panta , S.B Sinha INTRODUCTION The case of Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel vs. State of Gujarat is a Read more…
CITATION 1994 SCC (3) 569, JT 1994 (2) 423, 1994 DATE 11th March, 1994 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER KARTAR SINGH (PETITIONER) DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. STATE OF PUNJAB (RESPONDENT) JUDGES Justice R.M. Sahai Justice S.R. Pandian Justice M.M. Punchhi Justice K. Ramaswamy Justice S.C. Agrawal INTRODUCTION: The Kartar Singh v. Read more…
![R VS PRINCE [1875]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/image-6-360x240.png)
CITATION R vs Prince [1875] LR 2 CCR 154 DATE June 26, 1875 COURT NAME(COUNTRY) United Kingdom DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Henry Prince PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER The state represented by R JUDGES Justice Brett INTRODUCTION Henry Prince was convicted under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 of unlawfully and carnally knowing (the then term Read more…
CITATION 1974 AIR 1570, 1570, 1570,1975 SCR (1) 409 DATE AND YEAR 2ND 1974 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF STATE OF U.P DEFENDANT RAM SWARUP & ANR BENCH Y.V CHANDRACHUD, M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG, V.R KRISHNAIYER INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India’s 1974 decision in the case of State Read more…