Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
      • Bail
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

Case Laws

Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) (Suo Motu criminal contempt proceeding)
Case Laws

Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) (Suo Motu criminal contempt proceeding)

Case – In Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) Case type – Suo Motu criminal contempt proceeding  Bench – B.R. Gavai J., Krishna Murari J., Arun Mishra J. Parties  – Respondent -: Adv. Prashant Bhusan, Twitter India Citation  -SCM (CRL.)No. 000001 -/2020 Facts 27th June , 2020-: “When historians in future look back Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsApril 5, 2023 ago
Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar v. Union of India (No pension to the child adopted after the death of a government employee)
Case Laws

Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar v. Union of India (No pension to the child adopted after the death of a government employee)

A case regarding whether the child adopted after the death of a government employee is entitled to a pension was decided on 17 January 2023 by the two-judge bench, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, and Justice B.V. Nagarathna.  The Appellant (Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar) was represented by the learned counsel, Mrs. K. Read more

By Admin, 2 years ago
Case Laws

VISHAKHA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AIR 1997 SC 3011

GENERAL INFORMATION NAME OF THE CASE VISHAKHA AND ORS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN CITATION AIR 1997 SC 3011 DATE OF THE JUDGEMENT 13 AUGUST 1997 PETITIONER VISHAKHA & ORS. RESPONDENT STATE OF RAJASTHAN BENCH J.S. VERMA (CHIEF JUSTICE), SUJATA V. MANOHAR, B.N. KIRPAL STATUETES/ CONSTITUTION INVOLVED INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsMarch 27, 2023 ago
Case Laws

GOLAKNATH V. STATE OF PUNJAB 1967 AIR 1643,1967 SCR(2) 762

GENERAL INFORMATION NAME  OF THE CASE I.C. GOLAKNATH AND ORS. V. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. CITATION 1967 AIR 1643, 1967 SCR (2) 762 DATE OF THE JUDGEMENT 27/02/1967 PETITIONER I.C. GOLAKNATH AND ORS. RESPONDENT STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. BENCH SUBBA RAO, K.N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH, S.M. SIKRI, Read more

By Admin, 2 yearsMarch 23, 2023 ago
Kesavananda Bharti Sripadagalvaru & Ors. Vs. State Of Kerala & Anr.
Case Laws Constitutional Law

Kesavananda Bharti Sripadagalvaru & Ors. vs. State Of Kerala & Anr.

FACT OF THE CASE ISSUE RASIED 2 . What is the extent to which the Parliament can exercise its power to amend the Constitution? Contentions of the Petitioners Contentions of the Respondents RATIO DECIDENDI ( 7:6 ) JUDGEMENT The thirteen-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Keshwanand Bharti Case 1973 by a majority of 7:6 held Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsDecember 31, 2022 ago
Harris v. Nickerson [1873] LR 8 QB 286
Case Laws Indian Contract Act, 1872

Harris v. Nickerson [1873] LR 8 QB 286

This article is written by Vamakshi Pareek of BA.LL.B. 2nd Year of RNB Global University, Bikaner. Facts of the Case Issues raised before the Court Contention at the part of: Plaintiff (Harris) Defendant (Nickerson) Judgment The court dismissed the claim of the plaintiff, and unanimously held that the advertisement was Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsDecember 21, 2022 ago
Case Laws Indian Contract Act, 1872

Carlill Vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256 (CA)

This article is written by Vamakshi Pareek of BA.LL.B. 2nd Year of RNB Global University, Bikaner. Facts of the Case Issues raised before the court Contentions at the part of: Appellant-Defendant’s arguments (Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.) Thus, the advertisement was an empty boast and the aim was merely to shoot Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsDecember 21, 2022 ago
Balfour v Balfour
Case Laws Indian Contract Act, 1872

Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2KB 571

This article is written by Monika Berar of BA.LL.B., 6th Semester, RNB Global University, Bikaner. Facts of the Case A couple named Mr. Balfour and Mrs. Balfour lived in  Ceylon ( Sri Lanka) and in 1915 they went to England for Vacation. During their vacation, Mrs. Balfour fell ill and Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsDecember 21, 2022 ago
[1913] 40 ALJ 489
Case Laws Indian Contract Act, 1872

Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt [1913] 40 ALJ 489

This article is written by Monika Berar of BA.LL.B., 6th Semester, RNB Global University, Bikaner. Facts of the case The nephew of Gauri Dutt (defendant) went missing. Gauri Dutt went out with a few of his servants to look for him after learning this. One of the servants sent to Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsDecember 21, 2022 ago
Case Laws

ANURADHA BHASIN VS UNION OF INDIA (2020) 3 SCC 637

OVERVIEW FACTS: ISSUES RAISED: The main issues raised by the Apex court were – ARGUMENTS: Petitioner’s Arguments: Respondents’ Arguments: JUDGEMENT/ ANALYSIS Regarding the first issue, the court held that the state was obligated to produce the orders before the court. Due to non-compliance of the state with the court’s directions Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsNovember 3, 2022 ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 199 200 201 Next

Visitor Count
2550421
Users Today : 2075
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle