Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

Case Laws

Case Laws

Lok Prahari v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 2005

INTRODUCTION: In our society, democracy plays a vital role in our constitution. A fair and clean electoral process is an essential element for any democracy. For every person have right to vote or right to contest elections and other matters which is necessary and it’s their right to know. In Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 26, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Re Keshav Singh Case (1965)

Introduction The In Re Keshav Singh case, also known as the Keshav Singh case, was a landmark case in Indian constitutional law. It was decided by a bench of the Allahabad High Court on 21st June 1965. The case dealt with the question of whether the Legislative Assembly had the Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 23, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Epuru Sudhakar & Anr vs Govt. Of A.P. & Ors

Introduction: In India, the procedure of granting pardon begins with the submission of a mercy plea to the president under Article 72[1] of the constitution. This petition is first examined by the home ministry in cooperation with the affected state government, and then it is forwarded to the president based Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 23, 2023 ago
Case Laws

ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY VS. UNION OF INDIA

INTRODUCTION: The petitioner requests guidance to take the necessary action to prevent anyone from running in more than one constituency at once in an election for the “same office” by the central government and the Indian Election Commission. The court asked the Union government and the Election Commission to “take Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 21, 2023 ago
Case Laws

JOGINDER KUMAR V. STATE OF UP AND ORS AIR 1994

CASE NUMBER WP Crl. No. 9/1994 EQUIVALENT CITATION 1994 AIR 1349, 1994 SCC (4) 260 BENCH M.N.VENKATACHALLIAH (CJ), S. MOHAN (J), A.S. ANAND (J) DECIDED ON 25 April 1994 GUIDELINES FOR ARREST FACTS The petitioner, a 28-year-old guy who was registered as an advocate. In order to inquire about a Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 21, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Lt. Col. Nitisha and Ors vs Union Of India 25th March, 2021

Introduction : Lt. Col. Nitisha and Ors vs Union of India is a landmark case in India that dealt with the issue of gender discrimination in the Indian Army. The case was filed by three serving women officers in the Army who challenged the Army’s policy of denying them permanent Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 21, 2023 ago
Case Laws

UNION OF INDIA V K.A. NAJEEB, (2021) 2 SCC 202 – The Case that Defined ‘Terrorism’ Tag for Indians

Introduction: Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb[1] is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India on March 10, 2021. The case deals with the question of whether the term ‘terrorism’ can be applied to a person who has not committed any terrorist act, but who has Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 21, 2023 ago
Case Laws

GANESHA V. SHARANAPPA AND ANOTHER

IN THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA GANESHA V. SHARANAPPA AND ANOTHER CITATION: 2014 ALLMR 392 (Cri), I (2014) CCR 121 (SC), 2013 (4) MLJ 757 (Cri), 2013 (14) SCALE 59, (2014) 1 SCC 87 BENCH: CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT: NOVEMBER 19, 2013 APPELLANT: GANESHA Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 20, 2023 ago
Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Vs. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas
Case Laws

Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Vs. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas

Case Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Vs. Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas Bench The case was heard by a bench of judges in the Gujarat High Court, which included Justice Anant S. Dave and Justice S.G. Shah. Parties Plaintiff -: Jaiminiben Hirenbhai Vyas Defendant -: Hirenbhai Rameshchandra Vyas Citation (2010) 1 GLR 385 Introduction Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 20, 2023 ago
Jaya Bachchan vs Union of India & Ors
Case Laws

Jaya Bachchan vs Union of India & Ors

Introduction This is the landmark case regarding the office of profit given under Article 102 of the Indian Constitution. It was decided by a three-judge bench of Y.K Sabharwal Cji, C.K. Thakker, and R.V. Raveendran on 8 May 2006. The petitioner, Jaya Bachchan filed a civil Writ Petition before the Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsApril 20, 2023 ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 186 187 188 … 202 Next

Visitor Count
3885722
Users Today : 3138
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle